Photo via Mother Jones

Trump Aims to Open Nearly All National Forest Trails to Dirt Bikes and ATVs

Read the original at Mother Jones ↗
Cite

Juhlin, E. (2026, September 29). Trump Aims to Open Nearly All National Forest Trails to Dirt Bikes and ATVs. Mother Jones. https://www.motherjones.com/environment/2026/09/trump-us-forest-service-atv-dirt-bikes-off-road-vehicles-rules-trails/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Mother Jones · collected 2026-09-29 · by Ellis Juhlin

Quick Summary

The Trump administration plans to revise the United States Forest Service’s travel management rule, changing it so that national forest trails are open to motorized vehicles unless explicitly designated closed. Currently, trails must be specifically marked as accessible for ATVs and other off-road vehicles; this would reverse that policy. Environmental groups and nonmotorized recreation advocates oppose the change, arguing it could harm ecosystems and wildlife habitats critical for carbon sequestration in a warming climate. The proposed revision aims to increase recreational access but lacks clarity, potentially allowing unrestricted use of motorized vehicles on forest lands.
Written by AI on 2026-09-29, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

In an effort to change current regulations, Trump aims to permit nearly all national forest trails for dirt bikes and ATVs across the United States. This proposal contrasts with the existing "closed unless designated open" approach by the United States Forest Service, which restricts motorized vehicles on most forest trails unless explicitly permitted. Advocacy groups like Wild Montana stress that clear guidelines are essential, as various users—from recreationists to those in the timber industry—rely on well-defined travel management plans for clarity and safety. The current policy mandates that trails can only be used by motorized vehicles if they have been officially designated; otherwise, nonmotorized activities such as hiking or mountain biking are allowed. These detailed plans ensure each trail specifies whether it is open to specific types of access like horseback riding or off-road vehicles.

Written for “Trump National Forests Offroad Expansion” on 2026-11-04, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Trump National Forests Offroad Expansion
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
75
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
13%
10 of 75 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
60/100
Mother Jones's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-29 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Mother Jones · 445 article(s) · 1 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 1 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Ellis Juhlin
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 They might ride ATVs along dirt trails, snowmobile down winding tracks, or go off-roading in 4x4s.
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

Forest Service Grist Montana Free Press/Mountain Journal the Forest Service the Report for America Local News Initiative

Subjects

Edgington PERSON · 3× Forest Service ORG · 2× the Forest Service ORG · 2× Climate Desk ORG · 1× Grist ORG · 1× Montana Free Press/Mountain Journal ORG · 1× The US ORG · 1× The United States Forest Service’s ORG · 1× Trump PERSON · 1× the Report for America Local News Initiative ORG · 1×

Narrative

Hillary Eisen, the federal policy director for Wild Montana, a public lands advocacy organization, said everyone who uses forest lands, from recreationists and ranchers with grazing leases to those in the timber industry, relies on the clarity provided by travel management plans.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-29
🔮 They might ride ATVs along dirt trails, snowmobile down winding tracks, or go off-roading in 4x4s.
2026-09-29 · Mother Jones
Trump Aims to Open Nearly All National Forest Trails to Dirt Bikes and ATVs · assertive framing

Claims (75 extracted, 10 hedged)

This story, originally published by Grist in collaboration with Montana Free Press/Mountain Journal as part of the Report for America Local News Initiative, is reproduced here as part of the Climate Desk collaboration. asserted
story → publish → collaboration
There are many ways to enjoy the outdoors, but thrill-seekers visiting the nation’s national forests often turn to motorized recreation. asserted
seekers → be → recreation
They might ride ATVs along dirt trails, snowmobile down winding tracks, or go off-roading in 4x4s. uncertain
They → ride → 4x4s
The United States Forest Service’s approach to all such forms of recreation on trails can be summed up in four words: closed unless designated open. asserted
approach → sum → words
Unless a trail is explicitly designated as open to off-highway vehicles, such as side-by-sides and dirt bikes, it can only be used for nonmotorized recreation. asserted
it → designate → recreation
Most national forests have travel management plans that outline when a trail is open for nonmotorized use like mountain biking, horseback riding, or hiking, and when it’s open to off-highway vehicles. asserted
it → have → vehicles
These plans tend to be exhaustive and list which types of motorized or nonmotorized access are allowed on every trail, two-track, and road. asserted
types → tend → trail
The strict guidelines are a result of a Forest Service policy called the travel management rule. asserted
guidelines → call → policy
But the Trump administration wants to turn the current rule on its head. asserted
administration → want → head
In late August, the Forest Service announced its plan to revise the rule so that trails are open unless designated closed. asserted
trails → announce → rule
It would mean forest managers would be expected to prioritize motorized access on service roads, trails, and even backcountry airfields. asserted
managers → mean → roads
The US Department of Agriculture, of which the Forest Service is a part, has said that the move will increase recreation access and “simplify regulatory requirements.” asserted
move → say → requirements
The change is being opposed by sportsmen, backcountry horsemen, conservation organizations, and nonmotorized recreation groups. asserted
change → oppose → sportsmen
They say opening up all Forest Service trails to motorized access could have devastating consequences for the ecosystems and wildlife that rely on these lands. uncertain
that → say → lands
Healthy, intact forest ecosystems are also critical for sequestering carbon in a warming world. asserted
ecosystems → sequester → world
Hillary Eisen, the federal policy director for Wild Montana, a public lands advocacy organization, said everyone who uses forest lands, from recreationists and ranchers with grazing leases to those in the timber industry, relies on the clarity provided by travel management plans. asserted
who → say → plans
The Forest Service’s formal announcement to revise the rule is “vague,” “somewhat poorly written,” and “difficult to follow,” Eisen said. asserted
Eisen → revise → rule
Without clear guidelines in place, she fears motorized users could end up anywhere on the landscape. uncertain
users → fear → landscape
“Any sort of feature that you could interpret to be a trail or a road would be open to every type of use, unless closed,” she said. uncertain
she → interpret → use
“That could mean if you can get your side-by-side on there, have at it.” uncertain
you → mean → it
Chris Edgington, a watershed project manager with Montana Trout Unlimited, witnessed firsthand the environmental damage that can happen from off-highway vehicle use on the Middle Fork of the Judith River, which runs through the Little Belt Mountains of central Montana. asserted
which → witness → Montana
Prior to 2023, there were more than 80 entrances and 27 shallow spots along a 6-mile stretch of the river, where various types of vehicles, including cars and side-by-sides, crossed. asserted
types → be → sides
As these vehicles cut across, they caused erosion and an influx of sediment that coats rocks along the riverbed, suppressing insect life and the ability for fish to successfully spawn. asserted
fish → cut → life
By 2020, the sediment runoff had gotten so bad it was choking out nearly all the fish, Edgington said. asserted
Edgington → get → fish
“The fish population was estimated to be less than 10 percent of what we’d expect of a river that size and character,” Edgington said. asserted
Edgington → estimate → river
“The river had become over-widened and shallow, creating unusual riffles, and the river couldn’t manage its sediment load.” asserted
river → become → load
So Edgington brought together a diverse coalition of groups, including the off-highway vehicle community and the Great Falls Trail Bike Riders Association, environmental groups, and federal and local government agencies to address the issue. asserted
Edgington → bring → issue
They rebuilt 1,000 feet of riverbank, reduced the number of crossings by 80 percent, and built a new section of the off-highway vehicle and jeep trail so the area could still be used for recreation, without harming the river. uncertain
area → rebuild → river
It’s been a huge success, Edgington says, and the work is already paying off. asserted
work → say → ?
“Fish numbers are up,” he explained. asserted
he → explain → ?
“The work we did to remove the sediment is restoring water quality and the fish population in that incredible backcountry setting.” asserted
we → do → setting
The vehicles crossing the river weren’t breaking any rules; the Forest Service had designated the area open for motorized recreation, but the number of stream crossings degraded the health of the river and the threatened species that lived there, including the cutthroat trout. asserted
that → cross → trout
“I’m totally OK with appropriate machine use in the forest,” Edgington said. asserted
Edgington → ’m → forest
“But there are just places where the ecosystem is too sensitive to use this equipment.” asserted
ecosystem → be → equipment
The travel management plan, written by the Helena-Lewis and Clark National Forest, recognized this impact to the river and the need to reroute the road out of the river corridor. asserted
plan → write → corridor
Parts of the Middle Fork are protected as a Wilderness Study Area and an Inventoried Roadless Area. asserted
Parts → protect → Area
Edgington said that because of those protections and the travel management plan, it was worth investing in this restoration; he knew the conservation work would last. asserted
work → say → restoration
He said a full repeal of the travel management rule would create more problems than it intends to solve. asserted
it → say → problems
A change of this magnitude, he said, could be a devastating blow to river health and restoration projects like the Middle Fork Judith. uncertain
he → say → Judith
“Whether that’s off-highway vehicles in the river or motorcycles on horse trails, it’s going to create a lot of conflict and confusion and animosity between different user groups.” asserted
it → ’ → groups
…and 35 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support