Photo via The Globe and Mail

Supreme Court takes on more cases than in recent years, reversing trend

Read the original at The Globe and Mail ↗
Cite

Ebner, D. (2026, September 29). Supreme Court takes on more cases than in recent years, reversing trend. The Globe and Mail. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-supreme-court-takes-on-more-cases-than-in-recent-years-reversing-trend/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

The Globe and Mail · collected 2026-09-29 · by David Ebner

Quick Summary

The Supreme Court of Canada is handling more cases this year than it has since 2018, reversing a trend from recent years where they accepted only about 7% of applications annually. For 2026, the court has agreed to hear 41 new cases, representing a 13% acceptance rate, up significantly from previous years. This increase comes after criticism that the top court was not producing enough judgments and follows concerns among lawyers that fewer rulings lead to unresolved legal questions across Canada.
Written by AI on 2026-09-29, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

The Supreme Court of Canada is currently handling a higher volume of cases than it has since the late 2010s, reversing a trend where it was criticized for not producing enough judgments. Typically, out of several hundred applications received annually to hear cases in Ottawa, only about 7% were accepted in recent years. However, this year, the court is accepting around 13% of appeal requests, marking an increase. As of last week, the Supreme Court agreed to two more cases, bringing the total number of new cases for 2026 to 41, the highest since 2018 when it heard 42 new cases.

The court’s decision criteria are outlined in the Supreme Court Act: whether a case addresses questions of national importance or resolves conflicting judgments across lower courts. This uptick reflects concerns among lawyers and legal experts about the development and clarity of Canadian law, with fewer rulings from the top court leaving many legal questions unresolved.

Written for “Supreme Court Case Load Increase” on 2026-11-02, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Supreme Court Case Load Increase
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
36
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
6%
2 of 36 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
52/100
The Globe and Mail's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-29 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Globe and Mail · 1033 article(s) · 35 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 35 correction(s)

Who wrote this

David Ebner
7 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 In a social media post on Monday morning, the premier made one last push for “Yes to the Nine” and said it would mean Alberta “gets a real say” over immigration and “constitutional reforms that protect this province’s authority no matter who sits in Ottawa.”
🔮 A hearing on the Nuchatlaht case has not yet been scheduled and likely wouldn’t happen before next spring or possibly next fall.
🔮 If the top provincial court affirms the restoration of faint hope, it would likely presage a high-profile showdown at the Supreme Court of Canada.
🔮 The judges do not reveal why they say yes or no to new cases, but the Supreme Court Act outlines the main two criteria: whether a top court ruling would answer questions of national importance or settle conflicting judgments in the lower courts across the country.
🔮 The Supreme Court earlier this year said it might reconsider its Rahey precedent.
🔮 A Supreme Court ruling in May clearly stated that the country’s top judges are ready to reconsider one of their long-standing precedents.
🔮 Premier Doug Ford’s government said the new system, which was first announced last November, will improve public safety.
Also by David Ebner
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 7 articles by David Ebner →

Topics

Lenczner Slaght LLP Ottawa The Supreme Court of Canada the Supreme Court the Supreme Court Act

Subjects

the Supreme Court ORG · 7× Veel PERSON · 3× Toronto GPE · 2× Byma PERSON · 1× Daniel Byma PERSON · 1× Mahmud Jamal PERSON · 1× Ottawa ORG · 1× Richard Wagner PERSON · 1× The Supreme Court of Canada ORG · 1× Wagner ORG · 1×

Narrative

The judges do not reveal why they say yes or no to new cases, but the Supreme Court Act outlines the main two criteria: whether a top court ruling would answer questions of national importance or settle conflicting judgments in the lower courts across the country.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-29
🔮 The judges do not reveal why they say yes or no to new cases, but the Supreme Court Act outlines the main two criteria: whether a top court ruling would answer questions of national importance or settle conflicting judgments in the lower courts across the country.
2026-09-29 · The Globe and Mail
Supreme Court takes on more cases than in recent years, reversing trend · assertive framing

Claims (36 extracted, 2 hedged)

The Supreme Court of Canada is busier than it has been since the late 2010s, an increased workload that comes after criticism that the top court was not producing enough judgments. asserted
court → come → judgments
The court each year receives several hundred applications to have cases heard in Ottawa, but in the 2020s the judges have said yes to only 7 per cent of the requests. asserted
judges → receive → requests
This year, however, the court is saying yes much more often. asserted
court → say → ?
It has agreed to 13 per cent of appeal applications. asserted
It → agree → applications
Last week, the Supreme Court said yes to two more applications, bringing the number of new cases for 2026 to 41. asserted
Court → say → 41
This is the highest number of new appeals granted since 2018, when the court agreed to hear 42 new cases. asserted
court → grant → cases
The judges do not reveal why they say yes or no to new cases, but the Supreme Court Act outlines the main two criteria: whether a top court ruling would answer questions of national importance or settle conflicting judgments in the lower courts across the country. asserted
ruling → reveal → country
Concern among lawyers about the number of cases the Supreme Court hears each year centres on worries about the development and clarity of the law across the country. asserted
Court → hear → country
Fewer rulings from the top court means more legal questions are left unresolved. asserted
questions → mean → court
The Supreme Court aims to hear as many cases as possible, said Daniel Byma, executive legal officer and chief of staff to Chief Justice Richard Wagner. asserted
Byma → aim → Wagner
“The court does not set targets for the number of [appeal] applications it grants in a given year,” Mr. Byma said in response to questions about the court agreeing to more cases than in recent years. asserted
court → set → years
While the court’s workload has increased this year, it remains lower than in the 2010s. asserted
it → increase → 2010s
The Supreme Court in the 2020s has agreed to hear an annual average of 34 cases – two-thirds the average of 52 in the 2010s. asserted
thirds → agree → 2010s
Chief Justice Wagner, at his annual press conference in June, said the court is projecting its workload to rise back to the levels seen before the COVID-19 pandemic started in 2000. asserted
pandemic → say → 2000
Justice Mahmud Jamal in February was asked about trends in the court’s workload after a speech about the judges’ collegial decision-making. asserted
Jamal → ask → making
“We aren’t looking to take fewer cases,” Justice Jamal said. asserted
Jamal → look → cases
Questions about the court’s output have spiked at times over the decades. asserted
Questions → spike → decades
The court heard more than 100 cases a year for most of the 1990s. asserted
court → hear → 1990s
That workload was seen as overly heavy, as the judges sometimes struggled to produce timely judgments, but when it dipped in the mid-2000s to around 60 cases a year, some lawyers worried the court was hearing too few cases. asserted
court → see → cases
The more recent decline in the 2020s sparked renewed worries that the Supreme Court wasn’t delivering enough judgments on important issues of law across the country. asserted
Court → spark → country
Lawyer Paul-Erik Veel of Lenczner Slaght LLP in Toronto has tracked trends in the court’s workload in recent years. asserted
Veel → track → years
In a report in June, he highlighted the sudden increase in the percentage of appeal applications the court has agreed to hear. asserted
court → highlight → applications
Mr. Veel, as he has said in the past, argued that a shorter list of Supreme Court cases has real consequences: “It leaves more legal questions left unresolved.” asserted
It → say → questions
Mr. Veel’s analysis noted the court is taking on more cases in public law, which involve constitutional questions and other issues, and private law, which include disputes between individuals or businesses. asserted
which → note → individuals
He said the shift to hearing more cases, and a wider range, may suggest judges on the Supreme Court are looking to take on issues outside the usual fare of criminal law. uncertain
judges → say → law
“If that is right, that would be a welcome development,” Mr. Veel said. asserted
Veel → say → ?
Chris Sewrattan, a Toronto criminal defence lawyer who closely follows the work of the Supreme Court, said the judges may simply be seeing more cases of national importance this year than they had in recent years. uncertain
they → follow → years
He said he doubts the increased workload is a response to criticisms in the legal community and noted the Supreme Court’s varying number of judgments has not captured the general attention of Canadians. asserted
number → say → Canadians
He also said the court has been busy in recent years, even with fewer cases, given the length of many of its written decisions. asserted
court → say → decisions
“If we are entering a new era of more judgments and shorter decisions, I welcome the change,” Mr. Sewrattan said. asserted
Sewrattan → enter → change
The court’s fall session begins in early October and the schedule is packed with 27 hearings. asserted
schedule → begin → hearings
The dispute that will likely garner the most attention is set for Nov. 9 and 10, when the court will hear four appeals on the federal government’s 2020 firearms regulations. asserted
court → garner → regulations
Those rules effectively prohibited more than 1,500 firearms that had been previously legal for licensed ownership and use. asserted
that → prohibit → ownership
Ottawa has described the banned guns as assault weapons that have been used in mass shootings. asserted
that → describe → shootings
Legal challenges against the gun prohibitions have twice failed, first at the Federal Court in 2023 and then again at the Federal Court of Appeal last year. asserted
challenges → fail → Appeal
The Supreme Court agreed to hear the four firearms appeals in March this year. asserted
Court → agree → March
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support