A Christian addition to her TD Insurance email signature has cost a senior manager her $210,000-per-year job.
asserted
addition → cost → job
In a statement of claim filed with the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Toronto, Sonja Denobrega seeks more than $400,000 in damages from TD, alleging she was wrongfully dismissed after tagging “I am HIS ✝️” on to the end of her email signature in a stand against a company policy that she says “only allowed for gender/sex identification and allowed no room for other identities.”
uncertain
she → file → identities
Denobrega, the company’s former associate vice-president of underwriting operations, claims that her January 2026 firing was discriminatory, alleging that her termination was based partly on her creed and age.
uncertain
termination → claim → creed
For its part, TD says that 52-year-old Denobrega’s dismissal had nothing to do with her creed, age or any other protected characteristic under human rights legislation.
asserted
dismissal → say → legislation
Instead, the company’s statement of defence says that it had just cause to terminate Denobrega’s employment without notice, as a result of her wilful subordination after she repeatedly ignored warnings to bring her email signature into compliance.
asserted
she → say → compliance
“The Plaintiff’s employment was terminated solely due to her failure to comply with TD’s standards regarding email signatures, which were explained to her on several occasions,” the court document reads.
asserted
document → terminate → occasions
“As a senior employee in a leadership position, the Plaintiff was expected to model compliance with TD’s policies, not to defy them.
asserted
Plaintiff → expect → them
Her misconduct undermined TD’s ability to rely on her to follow TD procedures and guidelines and resulted in a loss of trust that irreparably damaged the employment relationship.
asserted
that → undermine → relationship
According to Denobrega’s claim, she told a HR representative that she wanted TD to remove pronouns from its signature lines.
uncertain
TD → accord → lines
However, the company’s response says that its policy of permitting – but not requiring – employees to identify their pronouns was non-negotiable.
asserted
policy → say → pronouns
“TD cannot reverse this policy as doing so would be a breach of its obligations under the Canadian Human Rights Act,” the company says in its statement of defence.
asserted
company → reverse → defence
None of the allegations in either document have been proven in court.
asserted
None → prove → court
Denobrega did not respond to a request for comment, while a TD spokesperson said the company was unable to say anything further as the matter is before the courts.
asserted
matter → respond → courts
Denobrega has more than 25 years of experience in the insurance business, but had only been at TD for a few months following a switch from a rival insurer, before the email-signature saga began in late October 2025.
asserted
saga → have → October
According to TD’s account of events, that’s when its HR department received a complaint about one of Denobrega’s colleagues, who had modified her email signature to add “Pronouns: I am HIS ✝️,” which the complainant said could be taken as a micro-aggression against members of the LGBTQ+ community.
uncertain
complainant → accord → community
Denobrega’s claim says that the incident spurred her to offer support to the colleague and look into TD’s Christian-related resources, which ultimately left her unimpressed.
uncertain
which → say → her
Denobrega “felt that there were fewer resources for Christians at TD and more resources for the LGBT community which she found unfair,” the statement of claim says.
uncertain
statement → feel → claim
When Denobrega found out that the colleague had been asked to remove the line from her email signature, she took her support a step further, adding the “I am HIS ✝️” line (without the reference to pronouns) to her own in solidarity.
asserted
I → find → solidarity
In a meeting with her boss and two HR representatives, Denobrega called for a TD-wide review of email signature compliance, explaining that her problem with company’s policy was that she felt it “only allowed for gender/sex identification and allowed no room for other identities.”
asserted
it → call → identities
Several more meetings followed, in which TD’s insistence that the email signature additions be removed and Denobrega’s push for a company-wide email signature check and escalation to the CEO were each rebuffed by the opposing sides.
asserted
push → follow → sides
However, Denobrega did succeed in convincing TD to send an email blast reminding around 10,000 of its insurance division staff of the current email signature standards, according to her claim.
uncertain
Denobrega → succeed → claim
In court documents, Denobrega is seeking compensation for $235,000 in lost pay and bonuses during a 12-month notice period, as well as a further $210,000 for punitive damages and human rights violations, arguing that TD’s punishment was disproportionate to her alleged misconduct.
asserted
punishment → seek → misconduct
“Sonja had no intention of behaving in a manner that would jeopardize her employment” and was “completely unaware that her actions would result in her termination,” Denobrega’s claim reads.
uncertain
claim → have → termination
TD’s defence says that the code of conduct it provides to every employee warns that any breach could result in discipline, including termination.
uncertain
breach → say → termination
Meanwhile, its email signature standards prohibit personalization through “quotes, taglines, icons, images, slogans, or other personal statements.”
asserted
standards → prohibit → quotes
In addition, TD’s email signature rules permit “only limited, optional identifiers such as personal pronouns, consistent with its obligations” under the company’s code of conduct, respectful workplace policy and applicable law, the statement of defence continues.
asserted
statement → permit → defence
Toronto employment lawyer Paulette Haynes, who has no involvement in the case, says each party will face its own challenge as the dispute progresses through the court system.
asserted
dispute → have → system
On the issue of alleged discrimination, Denobrega will have the burden of proving a link between her religious views and the reasons for her termination, Haynes explains.
asserted
Haynes → allege → termination
“The bank’s defence says that she has not established that causal nexus,” she adds.
asserted
she → say → nexus
Meanwhile, the onus will shift to TD to back up its claim for “just cause” termination, which allows an employer to fire a worker without paying any severance.
uncertain
employer → shift → severance
“I always tell my employer clients that it’s an uphill battle when you terminate for just cause,” Haynes says.
“The misconduct has to be so egregious that it basically breaches the employment contract in a fundamental way,” she adds, explaining that proving a case depends heavily on the specific facts.
asserted
proving → tell → facts
A judge who ultimately hears the matter will look closely at the context when assessing whether an employer was right to invoke just cause, including the worker’s employment history and disciplinary record, Haynes says.
asserted
Haynes → hear → history
“It’s a unique case and I’ll be watching closely,” she says.
asserted
she → ’ → ?
The Aporia
