Photo via The Guardian

Stop shaming people for using AI. Start organizing to prevent our obsolescence | Garrison Lovely

Read the original at The Guardian ↗
Cite

Lovely, G. (2026, September 29). Stop shaming people for using AI. Start organizing to prevent our obsolescence | Garrison Lovely. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/sep/29/ai-replace-humans

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

The Guardian · collected 2026-09-29 · by Garrison Lovely

Quick Summary

Garrison Lovely argues against shaming individuals for using artificial intelligence (AI), suggesting that such criticism distracts from organizing resistance against tech companies aiming to render human labor obsolete. He points out that major AI firms like OpenAI and Anthropic are pursuing advanced systems capable of performing most economically valuable work better than humans, potentially leading to widespread unemployment. Instead of boycotting AI tools personally, Lovely advocates for public regulation and scientific oversight to ensure safe development, emphasizing the need for people to engage with these technologies critically while pushing back against corporate ambitions.
Written by AI on 2026-09-29, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

People often criticize those who use artificial intelligence (AI) technologies like Instagram and OpenAI's products, but Garrison Lovely argues that shaming individuals for using AI misses the bigger picture. The real issue is organizing against the companies developing these technologies, such as OpenAI and Anthropic, which aim to create systems capable of surpassing human abilities in most economically valuable work. For instance, Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, has stated that AI isn't a substitute for specific jobs but rather a general replacement for human labor. This underscores the industry's ultimate goal of creating universal labor-replacing machines, raising concerns about job displacement and economic disruption.

Written for “AI Ethics And FutureOfWork” on 2026-11-01, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 AI Ethics And FutureOfWork
Technology · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly left and hedges 13% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 12 of 62 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of concerns around artificial intelligence and do not describe the same specific incident.”
Semafor
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 1 of 9 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI, with Article A focusing on societal resistance and ethical concerns, while Article B focuses on economic impacts and sustainability issues.”
CBS News
Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A discusses general public sentiment towards AI, while Article B reports on a specific White House meeting and subsequent agreement.”
New York Post
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 4 of 22 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI usage and its impacts, with Article A focusing on general resistance to AI and Article B specifically addressing the impact of AI in schools on test scores.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
52
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
13%
7 of 52 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
66/100
The Guardian's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Technology
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-29 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Guardian · 1871 article(s) · 6 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 6 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Garrison Lovely
2 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 One employee initially placated by Kwon’s post followed up two days later flagging that Brockman’s money would be used to fund an X account the employee described as “an LTF sockpuppet (confirmed here) that posts stuff like “[sam altman is] a caterpillar that murders insects and stitches their dismembered body parts onto its back as armor.”
2026-10-02 · assertive framing · How employees forced OpenAI’s president to back down
🔮 The executives may contest this framing, offering some bromides about how AI will augment human work or how we’ll simply find new jobs to do.
Also by Garrison Lovely
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

Anthropic Claude Code Instagram National Labor Relations Board OpenAI

Subjects

OpenAI ORG · 3× Anthropic ORG · 1× Congress ORG · 1× Dario Amodei PERSON · 1× Dean Ball PERSON · 1× Instagram ORG · 1× Joshua Achiam PERSON · 1× Mark Zuckerberg’s PERSON · 1× Matt Bruenig PERSON · 1× National Labor Relations Board ORG · 1×

Narrative

But using what is increasingly an indispensable technology is not an endorsement of the industry building it, any more so than using Instagram to advocate for aggressive regulations on social media would be an endorsement of Mark Zuckerberg’s toxic empire.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-29
🔮 The executives may contest this framing, offering some bromides about how AI will augment human work or how we’ll simply find new jobs to do.

Claims (52 extracted, 7 hedged)

I don’t need to tell you that people hate AI. asserted
people → need → AI
But resistance to the technology has often taken the form of shaming people for personally using it, with precious little organizing against the companies building the machines. asserted
resistance → take → machines
This is perplexing, given that those companies are attempting to render us obsolete. asserted
us → give → ?
The executives may contest this framing, offering some bromides about how AI will augment human work or how we’ll simply find new jobs to do. uncertain
we → contest → jobs
But their clear goals are to create systems that so clearly surpass our abilities that we will have little hope of competing. asserted
we → create → hope
OpenAI defines its north star of artificial general intelligence (AGI) as “a highly autonomous system that outperforms humans at most economically valuable work”. asserted
that → define → work
And the Anthropic CEO, Dario Amodei, writes: “AI isn’t a substitute for specific human jobs but rather a general labor substitute for humans.” asserted
AI → write → humans
The industry’s ultimate ambition, what it calls AGI, is better understood as a universal labor-replacing machine. asserted
it → call → machine
These systems would be able to do any work a human could do from a remote desk – leaving livelihoods safe to the extent a human touch is preferred, a physical presence is required, or the jobs themselves are legally protected. uncertain
jobs → do → extent
You may doubt that the industry will ever succeed in its perverse quest, but we should agree that it shouldn’t even be allowed to try. uncertain
it → doubt → quest
We should freeze frontier AI development – that is, the effort to build AGI, and only resume the work when there is strong public buy-in and broad scientific consensus that it will be done safely and controllably. asserted
it → freeze → work
But realizing this commonsense ideal will require us to get organized enough to overcome the richest industry in history. asserted
realizing → realize → history
And that means changing the way we think about AI. asserted
we → mean → AI
In many corners of the internet, especially on the left, people pride themselves on never touching the stuff–while simultaneously making bold, deeply mistaken claims about its nature and capabilities. uncertain
people → pride → nature
I understand the reluctance to give these companies your money, your data, your attention. asserted
I → understand → money
But using what is increasingly an indispensable technology is not an endorsement of the industry building it, any more so than using Instagram to advocate for aggressive regulations on social media would be an endorsement of Mark Zuckerberg’s toxic empire. asserted
using → use → empire
Moreover, the people using AI are going to outcompete the ones who don’t, bending the world in their preferred direction, while forming a deeper understanding of the technology itself. asserted
who → use → technology
Bosses will use Claude Code to replace workers, while the leftist policy analyst Matt Bruenig is having it build a publicly accessible, automatically updating database of National Labor Relations Board decisions. asserted
it → use → decisions
If you’re serious about your mission, you should use whichever tools work best. asserted
tools → ’re → mission
Most importantly, anyone not seriously engaging with what the technology can already do – and might soon do – is ceding their seat at the table. uncertain
technology → engage → table
Sixty-nine active members of Congress have publicly used terms like artificial superintelligence, the Singularity, and AI existential risk. asserted
members → use → superintelligence
If certain techies are the only people willing to acknowledge that the technology’s capabilities have dramatically improved and could pose a species-level threat in the future, that’s who concerned policymakers will disproportionately listen to. uncertain
policymakers → acknowledge → who
Even non-leftists recognize it. asserted
leftists → recognize → it
Joshua Achiam, then OpenAI’s chief futurist, declared: “The left has completely abdicated their role in this discussion. asserted
left → declare → discussion
A decade from now, this will be understood on the left to have been a generational mistake; perhaps even more than merely generational.” asserted
this → understand → left
Dean Ball, who led the authorship of Trump’s AI action plan before becoming an executive at OpenAI, declared: “Joshua is right.” asserted
Joshua → lead → OpenAI
You may be suspicious of political adversaries wishing you were more present in the arena, but they recognize that – on the technology’s current course – this is an all-hands-on-deck situation. uncertain
this → wish → deck
Indeed, we all need to reckon with the industry’s race to replace us, but we especially need – and especially don’t have – the left. asserted
we → need → left
We need organizers. asserted
We → need → organizers
We need people who can’t help but think about power to teach the ones who never learned to. asserted
who → need → ones
We need ambition. asserted
We → need → ambition
We need people who believe that better worlds are possible. asserted
worlds → need → people
The popularity of stigmatizing individual AI usage has been a gift to the industry, fracturing would-be opponents and activating our identities as consumers. asserted
popularity → stigmatize → consumers
BP had to pay an ad agency to popularize the “carbon footprint” to shift the blame for climate change to individuals. asserted
BP → have → individuals
When we think as consumers, the goal becomes minimizing our own complicity. asserted
goal → think → complicity
We should instead think as citizens: how do we democratically govern this technology in the public interest? asserted
we → think → interest
Right now, AI is being governed by unelected, unaccountable tech billionaires, subject to intense pressures from shareholders and the Trump administration. asserted
AI → govern → shareholders
To have any hope of changing this intolerable status quo, we’ll need to build a movement powerful enough to defeat the richest industry in history. asserted
we → have → history
In March, when I finished writing Obsolete, the book this piece draws from, I predicted: It won’t be easy, but the ingredients are there for a mass movement unlike any the world has ever seen. asserted
world → write → any
Everyone has a stake in how AI develops – a reality that will become increasingly indisputable as the technology eats ever more of the world. asserted
technology → have → world
…and 12 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support