Photo via Reason

The Way the FDA and DEA Ban Drugs Is Unaccountable and Arbitrary

Read the original at Reason ↗
Cite

Curtis, R. (2026, September 29). The Way the FDA and DEA Ban Drugs Is Unaccountable and Arbitrary. Reason. https://reason.com/2026/09/29/the-way-the-fda-and-dea-ban-drugs-is-unaccountable-and-arbitrary/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Reason · collected 2026-09-29 · by Ryan Curtis

Quick Summary

A new Government Accountability Office (GAO) report criticizes the arbitrary nature of drug scheduling by the DEA and FDA under the Controlled Substances Act. The report reveals that both agencies lack clear policies or procedures for evaluating and scheduling drugs, despite claims to follow established guidelines. This absence of formal standards means major decisions about drug classification are made without consistent criteria, impacting how substances like psilocybin and marijuana are regulated.
Written by AI on 2026-09-29, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

A new Government Accountability Office (GAO) report reveals how arbitrary drug scheduling decisions can be in the United States under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA). According to the report, despite the DEA's responsibility for enforcing and implementing the CSA by scheduling drugs based on their potential for abuse and medical use, it lacks formal policies or procedures guiding staff evaluations. This results in a largely improvised process when deciding how to classify substances like marijuana, which remains listed as Schedule I despite widespread acceptance and therapeutic benefits. The report highlights that other substances under Schedule I include heroin, psilocybin, LSD, and DMT, all categorized alongside cannabis due to high potential for abuse and dependence, regardless of medical utility.

Written for “FDA DEA Drug Bans” on 2026-11-01, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 FDA DEA Drug Bans
Health · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 3% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Toronto Star
Hedges 5 of 52 claims Outlet record 64/100
“The articles discuss different issues related to drug regulation and misuse, with Article A focusing on the arbitrary nature of drug scheduling by federal agencies and Article B detailing a pharmacist's misconduct leading to licence revocation.”
Reason
Hedges 0 of 24 claims Outlet record 67/100
“Both articles discuss the same topic, the scheduling system of drugs regulated by the DEA and FDA, but they do not describe a single specific event or incident.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
33
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
3%
1 of 33 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
67/100
Reason's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Health
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-29 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Reason · 1047 article(s) · 4 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 4 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Ryan Curtis
9 article(s) here · 0 carrying a prediction
🔮 The bloc, according to The Times of Israel, will enter the Knesset with 53 seats, while the main opposition bloc led by Gadi Eisenkot will hold 48.
🔮 In 2024, the LPNH endorsed Donald Trump for president instead of Libertarian candidate Chase Oliver, pushing the Libertarian National Committee to disaffiliate LPNH from the L.P.'s structure this past May.
🔮 Despite grumbling by some Democrats about Trump's decision to empty the Medicare Improvement Fund, it seems unlikely the choice will detract from Medicare's ability to provide services.
🔮 Under precedent set by Employment Division v. Smith (1990), a law may burden religious exercise only if meets the "rational basis" test and if it is "neutral and generally applicable."
🔮 In an appearance on The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie, financier and former White House Communications Director Anthony Scaramucci—who infamously served for just 11 days during Trump's first term—proposes some answers for how we got here and where the country could go next.
2026-09-23 · assertive framing · Three Mistakes That Made Donald Trump
🔮 The designation does not yet have a clear definition, but the two sides have said that they hope it will yield closer cooperation in energy, trade, technology, and Arctic security.
🔮 On Thursday, the United States Supreme Court issued a ruling in Missouri's controversial redistricting battle, backing the Missouri Supreme Court's decision that the state could not use a congressional map drafted by the state's Republican Gov. Mike Kehoe last year.
🔮 Last week, Southern Methodist University (SMU) informed the Texas chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) that it could no longer host the group's Muslim Youth Leadership Symposium in September.
Also by Ryan Curtis
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 9 articles by Ryan Curtis →

Topics

DEA FDA GAO The CSA the Controlled Substances Act

Subjects

DEA ORG · 11× GAO ORG · 7× FDA ORG · 5× Food and Drug Administration ORG · 1× the Drug Enforcement Administration ORG · 1× the Government Accountability Office ORG · 1× the United States GPE · 1×

Narrative

The GAO report peels back the obfuscated layers of federal bureaucracy behind the scheduling process, revealing that major scheduling decisions made by the DEA follow a mostly made-up procedure: "DEA does not have any policies or procedures regarding how its staff are to conduct evaluations or schedule substances."
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-29
2026-09-29 · Reason
The Way the FDA and DEA Ban Drugs Is Unaccountable and Arbitrary · assertive framing

Claims (33 extracted, 1 hedged)

Since the beginning of the war on drugs over 55 years ago, the federal government has been classifying and regulating drugs through a "scheduling" system. asserted
government → classify → system
A new report from the Government Accountability Office (GAO) reveals just how arbitrary scheduling decisions made by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) can be. asserted
decisions → reveal → Administration
In the United States, the primary law regulating drugs is the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) of 1970. asserted
law → regulate → 1970
The CSA establishes five "schedules" of drugs, tiered by their "potential for abuse," their medical use potential, and their likelihood of developing "psychological or physical dependence" in users. asserted
CSA → establish → users
Of the five options, Schedule I is reserved for substances that have high potential for abuse and dependence and have no medical use. asserted
that → reserve → use
Schedule I is a grab bag of drugs, ranging from highly dangerous substances (like heroin), to taboo psychedelics (like psilocybin, LSD, and DMT), to marijuana (despite broad use and acceptance). asserted
I → range → use
The DEA is the agency that enforces the implementation of the Controlled Substances Act and is responsible for scheduling and rescheduling drugs. asserted
that → enforce → drugs
The GAO report peels back the obfuscated layers of federal bureaucracy behind the scheduling process, revealing that major scheduling decisions made by the DEA follow a mostly made-up procedure: "DEA does not have any policies or procedures regarding how its staff are to conduct evaluations or schedule substances." asserted
staff → peel → substances
The GAO says that when it asked DEA and FDA officials about their standard operating procedure for scheduling, they usually pointed to the CSA of 1970 or the longstanding memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the two organizations. asserted
they → say → organizations
But the GAO's meddlesome investigations found that neither document provides the guidelines that officials claim to be following. uncertain
officials → find → that
The report reads, "Based on our review of the MOU, it does not include policies and procedures specifically outlining DEA's responsibilities and procedures related to drug scheduling under the [CSA]." asserted
it → read → CSA
Officials then tried pointing to the CSA itself, claiming it included "clear and strict legal procedures" about scheduling. asserted
it → try → scheduling
But the GAO disagrees: "Based on our review of the [CSA], it does not provide this level of specificity (e.g., roles, responsibilities, and procedures) regarding how DEA is to carry out these responsibilities." asserted
DEA → disagree → responsibilities
For an organization whose sole responsibility is to "enforce controlled substances laws," you'd think officials actually know the content of the most critical of those laws. asserted
officials → enforce → laws
The problem is not just localized to the DEA. asserted
problem → localize → DEA
Given the FDA's role in reaching scheduling decisions, the GAO also examined that agency's procedures and found a similarly troubling lack of written standards. asserted
GAO → give → standards
The report found that "FDA does not have policies or procedures that…clearly define the criteria and process for determining a substance's 'potential for abuse,' including its abuse potential relative to other substances." asserted
that → find → substances
Without comparing abuse potential relative to other substances, drug regulators can bend the concept of abuse potential without accountability. asserted
regulators → compare → accountability
When the DEA rejected a petition to reschedule marijuana in 2016 asserted
DEA → reject → 2016
, it cited marijuana's widespread use as evidence of its potential for abuse, without providing quantitative measures of addictiveness relative to other substances. asserted
it → cite → substances
A 2011 study found that 8.9 percent of marijuana users developed a dependence disorder—a low figure when compared to 67.5 percent of nicotine users, 22.7 percent of alcohol users, or 20.9 percent of cocaine users. asserted
percent → find → users
DEA officials told the GAO that they made all scheduling decisions with heavy consultation from medical experts, all of whom hold advanced degrees. asserted
all → tell → degrees
It seems unlikely that the DEA and FDA—agencies with thousands of staff members and billions in annual budgets—are just winging every assessment, but who is to say whether the "professional judgment" of drug regulators is right or wrong, if there is no procedure to check it against? asserted
judgment → seem → it
Accurate scheduling is very important, as lower schedules apply stricter regulatory barriers for research. asserted
schedules → apply → research
Many drugs currently banned under the CSA have shown potential for use in experimental psychology but have to go through lengthy approval processes before they can be used in tests. asserted
they → ban → tests
Reason's Jacob Sullum has written how the federal ban on MDMA has prevented labs from finalizing experimental PTSD treatment. asserted
ban → write → treatment
Thankfully, the past 10 years have seen slow but positive movement toward the federal rescheduling and legalization of some drugs, especially marijuana. asserted
years → see → drugs
In 2022, the Biden administration launched an inquiry seeking to reschedule marijuana, a policy which has been continued by the Trump administration. asserted
which → launch → administration
In April, acting Attorney General Todd Blanche signed an order that formally moved state-approved medical marijuana products from Schedule I to Schedule III. asserted
that → act → Schedule
This is not legalization; marijuana is still federally banned. asserted
marijuana → ban → ?
The federal government's blanket hostility to drug use has failed. asserted
hostility → fail → use
For decades, federal drug policies have driven a nationwide system of prohibition that has led to over-policing and mass incarceration, without reducing overdose deaths. asserted
that → drive → deaths
If the federal government is going to decide what people can and can't put in their bodies, it must do so with clarity and accountability. asserted
it → go → clarity
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support