Lindsay Clancy's attorney argues for the first time that there's no evidence she killed her kids

Judge William Sullivan denied Lindsay Clancy's defense motion to find her not guilty of murdering her three children, ruling that prosecutors presented sufficient evidence for a jury to determine she was criminally responsible despite suffering from mental illness. The judge noted that it is up to the jury to decide whether expert witnesses' testimony about her lack of criminal responsibility should be accepted or rejected. This decision leaves open the possibility of a retrial following the earlier mistrial due to a deadlocked jury. Clancy's lawyer argued there was insufficient evidence proving she committed the killings, but Sullivan disagreed, stating that any rational trier of fact could find her guilty based on the presented evidence. The case now remains unresolved with ongoing debate about criminal responsibility and mental health considerations in legal proceedings.