Photo via The Guardian

Nandy says children’s social media ban only ‘staging post’ in online safety drive

Read the original at The Guardian ↗
Cite

correspondent, A. T. P. (2026, September 30). Nandy says children’s social media ban only ‘staging post’ in online safety drive. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/sep/30/lisa-nandy-social-media-ban-online-safety-culture-secretary

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

The Guardian · collected 2026-09-30 · by Alexandra Topping Political correspondent

Quick Summary

Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy has stated that banning children under 16 from accessing high-risk social media platforms is just a preliminary measure in the government’s online safety initiative. This ban, along with restrictions for 16- and 17-year-olds on certain features of websites, will start in March following a consultation that received over 116,000 responses, with 85% of parents viewing social media risks as outweighing its benefits. Nandy emphasized at the Labour party conference that further interventions are planned to ensure online safety, likening current measures to keeping children confined for protection and asserting the need for active regulation by the state in this digital space.
Written by AI on 2026-09-30, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Lisa Nandy, the UK Culture Secretary, has warned technology firms that the government's push to enhance online safety is just beginning. Earlier this year, plans were announced to ban teenagers under 16 from accessing "high-risk" social media apps like Instagram and TikTok, while implementing restrictions on platforms for 16- and 17-year-olds that allow infinite scrolling and algorithmic content curation. These changes are set to take effect in March. Nandy stated at the Labour party conference that this ban is merely a "staging post" towards more stringent regulation of online spaces, aiming to make them safer, inclusive, and empowering for users. She emphasized the government's willingness to challenge major tech companies despite potential backlash from US authorities, highlighting their commitment to promoting technology as a force for good in society.

Written for “Online Safety For Children” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Online Safety For Children
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 4% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Al Jazeera
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 4 of 18 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles describe different aspects of online safety and regulation for social media platforms, not the same specific legal event or incident.”
NPR
Hedges 6 of 51 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of online safety for children and do not describe the same specific incident or occurrence.”
Dawn
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 0 of 13 claims Outlet record 72/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of online safety for children, with Article A focusing on government warnings and bans to technology firms in the UK, while Article B discusses recommendations by a commission in Pakistan.”
Toronto Star
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 2 of 44 claims Outlet record 64/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of online safety for children and teenagers, with Article A focusing on a government's announcement about banning under-16s from social media, while Article B covers expert opinions on the responsibility of tech companies and governments to prevent problematic use of digital technology.”
The Guardian
Hedges 1 of 16 claims Outlet record 66/100
“While both articles discuss the government's social media ban for under-16s in Australia, they describe different aspects and do not refer to a single specific incident or statement.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
24
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
4%
1 of 24 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
66/100
The Guardian's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-30 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Guardian · 2758 article(s) · 6 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 6 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Alexandra Topping Political correspondent
10 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The delay risks derailing a planned series of government announcements to tackle the youth jobs crisis, with ministers stating on Monday that jobs plans in business services, construction, technology and defence would be published this week.
🔮 It is antisemitic, and this side of the house will have nothing to do with it.
🔮 Bars, clubs and restaurants will offer up to 100,000 jobs to young people not in employment, education or training (Neet) over the next three years in an effort to give them a first step on the ladder into work.
🔮 But while Jenrick’s physical presence may be absent from the migraine-inducing interior of the International Convention Centre in the West Midlands, members could be forgiven for sighing that everywhere they looked, something reminded them of him.
🔮 While it is standard for the partners of prime ministers to have taxpayer-funded office support, van Heel has taken on a former special adviser to a cabinet member and is expected to play a more significant role behind the scenes than the previous prime minister Keir Starmer’s wife, Victoria, who continued her work in occupational health for the NHS throughout her husband’s tenure.
🔮 Earlier this year the government announced that teenagers under the age of 16 would be banned from accessing “high-risk” social media apps, while safer platforms would be subjected to restrictions.
🔮 Miliband has been on a journey since May 2014, when the then Labour leader was photographed ineptly eating a bacon roll during a campaign visit in New Malden.
🔮 Labour’s candidate for Holborn and St Pancras laughs and shakes her head with unusual vigour when asked if she would like to follow in the footsteps of the last member of parliament for the constituency, Keir Starmer.
🔮 In July, the Tory leader warned that anyone who supported net zero targets or Britain’s membership of the European convention on human rights would be blocked from standing as a candidate in the next election.
🔮 Company bosses will have to sit down with workers who request flexible working and justify their reasons for any refusals under new rights announced by Louise Haigh on Tuesday.
Also by Alexandra Topping Political correspondent
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 10 articles by Alexandra Topping Political correspondent →

Topics

Instagram Labour Snapchat TikTok YouTube

Subjects

Nandy PERSON · 5× TikTok ORG · 2× YouTube ORG · 2× Andy Burnham PERSON · 1× Georgia Harrison PERSON · 1× Keir Starmer PERSON · 1× Labour ORG · 1× Lisa Nandy PERSON · 1× Liz Kendall PERSON · 1× Snapchat ORG · 1×

Narrative

The MP for Wigan said the government had already shown a willingness to take on the big tech companies – and risk disapproval from US authorities – with plans to hand established broadcasters and media companies greater prominence on digital platforms such as YouTube and TikTok.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-30
🔮 Earlier this year the government announced that teenagers under the age of 16 would be banned from accessing “high-risk” social media apps, while safer platforms would be subjected to restrictions.

Claims (24 extracted, 1 hedged)

Lisa Nandy has warned technology firms that the government’s online safety crackdown is not finished, saying that banning under-16s from social media platforms is only a “staging post”. asserted
banning → warn → platforms
Earlier this year the government announced that teenagers under the age of 16 would be banned from accessing “high-risk” social media apps, while safer platforms would be subjected to restrictions. asserted
platforms → announce → restrictions
The changes, including restrictions for 16- and 17-year-olds on websites that allow infinite scrolling and algorithmic content, which can push harmful material into feeds, as well as tighter age-verification checks, will come into effect in March.. asserted
which → include → March
Nandy has now vowed to go further. asserted
Nandy → vow → ?
“We shouldn’t accept that this is the end,” the culture secretary said before her speech at the Labour party conference, which will be introduced by Georgia Harrison, a campaigner against image-based sexual abuse. asserted
which → accept → abuse
“This is a staging post to what must be a very active interventionist state, policing and regulating the online space so that people are safe.” asserted
people → police → space
She said the UK would be “pioneers of tech as a force for good” and would promote online spaces that were “genuinely safe, inclusive and empowering”. asserted
that → say → spaces
She praised the former prime minister Keir Starmer and the former technology secretary Liz Kendall for announcing the ban in June. asserted
She → praise → June
But she felt there had been a “step change” in the government’s approach since Andy Burnham became prime minister in July and handed her the online safety brief. asserted
Burnham → feel → brief
Comparing social media to real-world civic spaces, she said: “If we were in a situation where we were saying our town centres are now so unsafe that we’ve decided that every child is going to have to stay in their bedrooms, people would rightly be up in arms. asserted
people → compare → arms
“How have we got to a point where we’re saying these social media sites are so harmful and dangerous that we cannot conceive of any way of protecting our children except to remove them altogether? asserted
we → get → them
This ends now.” asserted
This → end → ?
A consultation on the ban, which will apply to apps such as TikTok, Snapchat, YouTube and Instagram, attracted more than 116,000 responses, with 85% of parents thinking the risk of social media outweighed any benefit. asserted
risk → apply → benefit
Nandy said she had told families bereaved as a result of teenagers experiencing online harm: “I want you to understand that that era ends today, and we start a new chapter where we have an active and empowering state that shapes those civic spaces so that they work for us.” asserted
they → say → us
The MP for Wigan said the government had already shown a willingness to take on the big tech companies – and risk disapproval from US authorities – with plans to hand established broadcasters and media companies greater prominence on digital platforms such as YouTube and TikTok. asserted
government → say → YouTube
“That is a difference of opinion with the US administration, but we do reserve the right to take a different approach,” she said. asserted
she → reserve → approach
While new technologies had always “upended society”, the internet was the only one to have been “entirely outsourced to the private sector” with no role for the state, Nandy said. asserted
Nandy → upend → state
“It’s not acceptable to outsource this to [the X owner, Elon] Musk or anybody else,” she said. asserted
she → outsource → owner
In one of her first moves on online safety, Nandy ordered technology companies to her office, and she said she was “not surprised, but appalled” that representatives from X failed to attend. asserted
representatives → order → X
She acknowledged “there really is a problem” with Ofcom’s ability to enforce regulations and make firms adhere to the Online Safety Act. asserted
firms → acknowledge → Act
“Laws are only as good as the ability to enforce them,” she said. asserted
she → enforce → them
Nandy has welcomed a suggestion from the BBC director general, Matt Brittin, that a “public service algorithm” could compete with big tech, which she felt fitted “with [Burnham’s] vision about the UK being a world leader in tech as a force for good”. uncertain
UK → welcome → good
“In order to do that, you’ve got to be in the game, investing [and] shaping the technology,” she added. asserted
she → get → technology
“But I think to win the permission of the public to do that, they’ve got to hear from us loud and clear that we will take action to protect people, particularly children, right now.” asserted
we → think → people
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support