For the better part of a year, the new Tom Cruise movie Digger has been sold on what is more or less a lie.
asserted
what → sell → year
The simple logline for a movie wouldn’t normally be worth quoting, but this one is notable for how the movie itself never really touches it.
asserted
movie → quote → it
It’s supposedly about Cruise’s character Digger Rockwell as he “embarks on a frantic mission to prove that he is humanity’s savior before the disaster he’s unleashed destroys everything.”
asserted
he → ’ → everything
This sounds like a dark-comic flipside to Cruise’s work in the Mission: Impossible franchise, which ballooned from slick TV series remake to Cruise-and-director playground to, in its final installments, movies perhaps overly enraptured with the messianic can-do/will-do spirit of their death-defying star.
asserted
which → sound → star
As such, the character never really goes on a “frantic mission” (possible or not) to save humanity.
asserted
character → go → humanity
Digger Rockwell is an ultra-powerful billionaire who looks much closer to a man of Cruise’s actual age (64) than the real-life star, and carries himself with a different form of swagger, trading in that intense sprint for a kind of loping cowboy walk.
asserted
who → look → walk
He speaks with a down-home Texas-sized accent and Coens-ish elocution (he even say “we’re in a tight spot” at one point, Clooney-style!), fawns over his pet cat as she hovers near death’s door, and showboats as loud as Cruise can, never lowering to his trademark menacing evenness.
asserted
Cruise → speak → evenness
Digger does indeed unleash a disaster with his oil rigs, which send a massive crack zig-zagging through the ice shelf, triggering a series of not-quite-natural disasters that put him in the hot seat with the president (John Goodman) and his administration composed primarily of cowardly yes-men (variously played by the somewhat overqualified likes of Riz Ahmed and Michael Stuhlbarg).
asserted
that → unleash → Ahmed
It’s telling that the administration’s response to Digger’s abuse of power is to essentially codify that power, allowing him to sit in on cabinet meetings and crucial decisions, despite not really having much of a plan.
asserted
him → ’ → plan
He’s got ideas about the “narrative,” all right, and what might realistically be done in the face of catastrophe, but his hubris doesn’t include a Cruise-style harebrained scheme to save everyone.
uncertain
hubris → get → everyone
He doesn’t seem especially eager to prove much of anything besides that he was, in some roundabout way, never wrong to doom the world.
asserted
he → seem → world
This makes Digger something of an inaction comedy: a dark parable about powerful men who refuse to do the right thing for most of their lives, and then decide there’s no need to start doing it once they reap for the rest of the world what they’ve sown for themselves.
asserted
they → make → themselves
It’s the brainchild of director/cowriter Alejandro González Iñárritu, who lured Cruise into his first non-thriller role in years; given that actor/filmmaker combo, it reads on paper like a bid to win Cruise an Oscar, or at least his first nomination in ages.
asserted
it → ’ → ages
It worked for Leonardo DiCaprio, who won his Academy Award for Iñárritu’s The Revenant, and for Michael Keaton, who scored his first-ever nomination for Iñárritu’s Birdman.
asserted
who → work → Birdman
I’m not sure if it will work quite the same here — ironically, for reasons that a) actually deepen and complicate Cruise’s performance and b) cannot be readily discussed without spoiling a major turn, not really hinted at in any of the trailers (or, certainly, the half-fake logline).
asserted
that → ’m → trailers
Let’s just say there’s another side to Cruise’s work in Digger, one involving less showboating, that manages to increase his performance’s scope while arguably decreasing its depth.
asserted
that → let → depth
In many of the splashiest scenes, he grabs the spotlight to rant or rave, yet the overall effect of the movie is to make one of the world’s most singular movie stars part of an ensemble again.
asserted
one → grab → ensemble
But unlike in Magnolia — his last acting nomination, a quarter-century ago — where a different form of showboating collapsed into devastating emotion.
asserted
form → collapse → emotion
In Digger, Iñárritu keeps the characters at distorted, satirical arm’s length, with his low-angle and fish-eyed shots — and then with a twist, adds another couple of arms in there to push the action further away from the audience.
There’s a little bit of intimacy it gains in the tradeoff, but it seems meager by comparison.
asserted
it → keep → comparison
It’s the damnedest thing, the way the movie satirizes the pitch-black environmental devastation we’ve been unleashing on the world, then seems aghast at how little satire can move the needle.
asserted
satire → ’ → needle
It’s a worthy subject; if only it didn’t feel, at times, like a whole movie responding to the fact that not everyone thought Adam McKay’s flat-footed doomsday comedy Don’t Look Up was very good.
asserted
Look → ’ → fact
But it’s in the same ballpark of laughs scattered to the apocalyptic winds.
asserted
it → ’ → winds
And yet, in a sense, Digger still demands to be seen on a big screen, maybe even with the kind of arrogance that allows Digger to demand a seat at the table even after he’s essentially destroyed it.
asserted
he → demand → it
Iñárritu shot the movie in VistaVision, a taller format previously used on One Battle After Another, which also means that its image will fill an extra-tall old-fashioned IMAX screen (although — speaking of extinction — there aren’t more than a few dozen of those available to show it that way).
asserted
image → shoot → it
I haven’t seen it in that format, but the movie is a truly theatrical, presentational experience that probably won’t play as well at home.
asserted
that → see → home
Cruise, of course, is a big-screen fixture, and the wildest thing about Digger — or at least the wildest thing that we didn’t already know in our hearts, whether or not we’re doing anything about it — is how it’s able to elicit such a big, bold performance from such a big, bold star, project it on a big, bold screen, and then still somehow cut Tom Cruise back down to size.
asserted
it → know → size
Jesse Hassenger (@rockmarooned) is a writer living in Brooklyn.
asserted
Hassenger → live → Brooklyn
He’s a regular contributor to The A.V. Club, Polygon, and The Week, among others.
asserted
He → ’ → others
The Aporia
