The Aporia
Blackman, J. (2026, September 30). District Court Declares Vacatur (Likely) Unconstitutional. Reason. https://reason.com/volokh/2026/09/30/district-court-declares-vacatur-likely-unconstitutional/
Blackman, Josh. “District Court Declares Vacatur (Likely) Unconstitutional.” Reason, 30 Sept. 2026, https://reason.com/volokh/2026/09/30/district-court-declares-vacatur-likely-unconstitutional/.
Blackman, Josh. “District Court Declares Vacatur (Likely) Unconstitutional.” Reason, September 30, 2026. https://reason.com/volokh/2026/09/30/district-court-declares-vacatur-likely-unconstitutional/.
Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.
Judge Kathryn Mizelle from the Middle District of Florida ruled that the "set aside" remedy under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) is likely unconstitutional. The ruling challenges the authority of Article III courts to vacate agency rules and regulations, which would cause their automatic removal from the Code of Federal Regulations. Judge Mizelle argues that such an action exceeds judicial power and improperly delegates legislative functions to the judiciary. She asserts that no amount of tradition or lower-court practice can make up for these constitutional issues, emphasizing that there is no precedent addressing the constitutional aspects of vacatur. The decision questions whether courts have the authority to directly alter regulatory texts through judicial actions, impacting how federal regulations are enforced and revised.