Photo via 404 Media

Lawyer Cites ChatGPT-Invented Fake Witnesses in Murder Appeal

Read the original at 404 Media ↗
Cite

Cole, S. (2026, September 30). Lawyer Cites ChatGPT-Invented Fake Witnesses in Murder Appeal. 404 Media. https://www.404media.co/chatgpt-fake-witnesses-testimony-stephen-aarons-new-mexico/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

404 Media · collected 2026-09-30 · by Samantha Cole

Quick Summary

A New Mexico lawyer, Stephen D. Aarons, used ChatGPT to create legal briefs for a murder case but included fabricated witnesses and testimony generated by the AI. During a hearing last month before five judges, Aarons admitted his mistake was due to "stupidity" and apologized without specifying how he informed his client, who is serving life in prison. Reuters reported that the New Mexico Supreme Court issued an order of direct contempt against Aarons for submitting false testimony from imaginary witnesses like Danny Stanton and Linda Stanton, among others, which included fabricated statements about the shooter’s appearance.
Written by AI on 2026-09-30, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

In New Mexico, lawyer Stephen D. Aarons used ChatGPT to generate a legal appeal for a man convicted of murdering his wife, unaware that the AI would fabricate false testimony from invented witnesses named Danny Stanton and Linda Stanton. During a hearing in front of five judges at the New Mexico Supreme Court, Aarons admitted his "stupidity" for relying on ChatGPT to create what he thought was a bulletproof summary but instead included fictional details about threats received by made-up people as well as false statements regarding the shooter's clothing and appearance. The court found Aars in direct contempt over this incident, highlighting the dangers of using unreliable AI tools in legal proceedings that could jeopardize clients' cases and careers.

Written for “Chatgpt Misused In Court” on 2026-11-02, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Chatgpt Misused In Court
Crime & Law · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
38
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
11%
4 of 38 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
95/100
404 Media's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Crime & Law
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-30 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

404 Media · 177 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Samantha Cole
27 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 On Thursday, the Organization for Transformative Works (OTW), the non-profit organization that runs AO3, posted that the site was down for maintenance, eventually updating to say the site restoration will take around two weeks, but could take up to a month.
🔮 Archive of Our Own (AO3), a massive repository for fanfiction and creative writing, might be down for as long as a month after going down for "maintenance" on Thursday.
🔮 “Meta’s own disclosures confirm that imagery processed through its glasses’ visual AI features may be retained and used to train AI systems, including with the assistance of human reviewers,” the letter says.
🔮 The update was originally set to go into effect on October 30, but following backlash, Meta changed the effective date to November 20.
🔮 In Sunday’s edition of the New York Times, Marissa Mayer, former president and CEO of Yahoo, told her interviewer something so absurd it’s since gone viral.
🔮 iFixit wrote a teardown analysis of the Duo, and speculated that the components around the hinge could be causing this particular white line issue:
🔮 What developed over the next few days, and has now stretched across six months, is a Kafkaesque situation in which Smith, in her telling, is being asked to prove her innocence in an ongoing criminal case, while CashApp refuses to provide her any information about the account because she couldn’t prove that she was the owner.
2026-10-22 · assertive framing · This Woman's Living a CashApp Scam Nightmare
🔮 THE BIG STORY A man convicted of manslaughter in Arizona will be resentenced because an AI-generated video of his victim speaking from beyond the grave was ruled to have carried “undue emotional weight” as an impact statement.
2026-10-07 · assertive framing · 'Undue emotional weight'
🔮 THE BIG STORY In the immediate weeks before Muse’s launch, Meta engineers found several security vulnerabilities in the company’s viral AI agent product, at least one of which could have allowed malicious users to break outside of Muse’s intended environment and access Meta’s own sensitive databases and services, 404 Media has learned.
2026-10-05 · assertive framing · Muse escapes containment
🔮 I can tell this because the AI responses seem to keep using the same or similar words that it believes would apply to journalists, or are how journalists speak, but as a real, human journalist for more than ten years, I know that journalists don’t actually speak like that.
2026-10-02 · assertive framing · Behind the Blog: Freaking Out
Also by Samantha Cole
Behind the Blog: Tech Support
2026-10-30 · 404 Media
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 27 articles by Samantha Cole →

Topics

Aarons ChatGPT New Mexico Reuters the New Mexico Supreme Court

Subjects

Aarons PERSON · 7× Reuters ORG · 2× Aaron PERSON · 1× Council ORG · 1× Danny Stanton PERSON · 1× Linda Stanton PERSON · 1× New Mexico GPE · 1× Rob Freund PERSON · 1× Stephen D. Aarons PERSON · 1× the New Mexico Supreme Court ORG · 1×

Narrative

There has been case after case after case showing attorneys failing their clients by submitting error-riddled AI-generated documents in their filings, and are the definition of “you had one job:” in the case of AI-brained lawyers, they can’t seem to resist taking shortcuts regardless of how risky it is for their own careers and their clients lives.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-30
🔮 He “assumed” ChatGPT would generate a “bulletproof summary of proceedings.”
2026-09-30 · 404 Media
Lawyer Cites ChatGPT-Invented Fake Witnesses in Murder Appeal · assertive framing

Claims (38 extracted, 4 hedged)

A lawyer used ChatGPT to generate briefs that included completely made-up witnesses and testimony while representing a man accused of shooting his wife. asserted
that → use → wife
When he was caught by the judges, the lawyer blamed it on his own “stupidity.” asserted
lawyer → catch → stupidity
“It's little comfort to know that my stupidity is what brings us together this afternoon,” New Mexico attorney Stephen D. Aarons said in a hearing last month before five judges. asserted
Aarons → know → judges
He “assumed” ChatGPT would generate a “bulletproof summary of proceedings.” asserted
ChatGPT → assume → proceedings
Instead, ChatGPT generated false testimony from “wholly fabricated witnesses,” according to an order of direct contempt from the New Mexico Supreme Court. uncertain
ChatGPT → generate → Court
Aarons was representing a man who was found guilty of killing his wife earlier this year; Aarons said he hadn’t told his client directly that he was caught using ChatGPT on the case because he’s currently serving life in prison. asserted
he → represent → prison
The false testimony included a nonexistent person named Danny Stanton saying he received threats, and another made-up person, Linda Stanton, saying her husband received threats. asserted
husband → include → threats
Other false testimony from more AI-generated people in Aarons’ brief included statements “regarding the shooter’s clothing and appearance,” according to the order. uncertain
testimony → generate → order
Reuters reported on the case earlier this month. asserted
Reuters → report → case
"I am remorseful but hopeful that the disciplinary board takes into account it was an honest mistake," Aarons told Reuters. asserted
Aarons → take → Reuters
"It is a lesson learned for all professionals who rely upon this powerful but sometimes unstable technology." asserted
who → learn → technology
Aarons’ reasoning for trusting ChatGPT, he said in the August hearing, was that he’d heard of doctors using AI for medical research. “ asserted
doctors → trust → research
So, Council, do you watch the news? asserted
you → watch → news
Do you listen to the radio? asserted
you → listen → radio
Do you read anything about what's going on in the world?” one of the judges asked Aarons. asserted
one → read → Aarons
“Because the problem with lawyers relying on AI hallucinations is an above-the-fold story every single day. asserted
lawyers → rely → fold
The court documents were first spotted by Rob Freund on X. Lawyers getting caught using AI and submitting errors to the court has been a big problem for years, and the judge is right: It’d be very hard to avoid hearing about this pattern of “stupidity” unless you were living under a rock. asserted
you → spot → rock
There has been case after case after case showing attorneys failing their clients by submitting error-riddled AI-generated documents in their filings, and are the definition of “you had one job:” in the case of AI-brained lawyers, they can’t seem to resist taking shortcuts regardless of how risky it is for their own careers and their clients lives. asserted
it → show → careers
Like in Aaron’s case, we sometimes get to hear and see judges go off on attorneys for this behavior. asserted
judges → get → behavior
In May, judges in the Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division let several lawyers have it for more than 20 minutes about their AI use and laziness, and called their failures “striking, concerning, disappointing, and saddening.” uncertain
lawyers → let → failures
And it’s not just lawyers anymore; court reporters are submitting AI-generated errors, too. asserted
reporters → ’ → errors
“So, either you buried your head in the sand. asserted
you → bury → sand
An intentional choice to be uninformed,” the judge continued to Aarons. asserted
judge → continue → Aarons
“Or, you took a gamble. asserted
you → take → gamble
So I'm really struggling with your response, saying, ‘Well, I didn't understand. asserted
I → struggle → response
I didn't know about hallucinations.’ asserted
I → know → hallucinations
My 13-year-old nephew knows about hallucinations. asserted
nephew → know → hallucinations
My 75-year-old stepmother knows about hallucinations. asserted
stepmother → know → hallucinations
So, either you made a decision not to be aware of what's happening in the world in using this tool appropriately, which is a willful choice. asserted
which → make → tool
Or you decided to roll the dice.” At the end of the hearing, Aarons admits that he hasn’t told his client directly about this mess, saying he’d only talked to his family members so far, telling them there was “a problem with the brief.” asserted
he → decide → brief
He said his client is hard to reach because he speaks Spanish and is in prison. asserted
he → say → prison
“So you didn't say, ‘I relied on ChatGPT, and it submitted lies to the court, and the court is mad at me, and now there's a hearing.’ asserted
court → say → me
I'm guessing you didn't tell your client’s family members that,” a judge asked Aarons. asserted
judge → guess → Aarons
“I didn't talk about ChatGPT. asserted
I → talk → ChatGPT
I just said there was a problem with a brief that I filed,” Aarons said. asserted
Aarons → say → that
According to the order, the judges found Aarons to be in direct contempt of court, referred him to the Disciplinary Board for further consideration, and barred from appearing before the court pending the outcome of the board’s investigation. uncertain
Aarons → accord → investigation
They also threw him off the case in question and assigned a public defender to his former client. asserted
They → throw → client
While he waits for the board to decide what to do with him, Aarons was sanctioned $5,000, which he must pay to the State Bar of New Mexico Client Protection Fund. asserted
he → wait → Fund
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support