In short:
A major Melbourne hospital has launched an investigation into whether gloves used by some staff provided appropriate protection against chemotherapy chemicals.
asserted
gloves → launch → chemicals
Some parts of the Royal Children's Hospital stopped using the gloves a decade ago, but others continued using them until Victoria's workplace regulator raised the issue in August.
asserted
regulator → stop → August
Hospital management have hired an independent organisation to test and assess the safety of the gloves and investigate possible exposure risk to staff.
asserted
management → hire → staff
Clinicians at Victoria's leading paediatric hospital have been wearing gloves that were not tested or approved for administering chemotherapy, raising concerns some staff may have been exposed to toxic chemicals for as long as 10 years.
uncertain
staff → lead → years
The sterile gloves provided by the Royal Children's Hospital (RCH) were not rated as protective for handling cytotoxic agents, such as chemotherapy, prompting the state's workplace regulator to raise the issue in August.
The issue occurred despite some areas of the hospital rolling out gloves with better protection when international standards for handling the chemicals were updated 10 years ago.
But other staff in the hospital, including in the Kookaburra Cancer Care ward, were still provided with the same gloves.
WorkSafe Victoria notified the hospital about the concern on August 26, prompting RCH to conduct a review and replace the gloves with those that met the standard.
Hospital apologises, launches investigation
In an email notifying staff, the hospital's chief executive Peter Steer and executive director of nursing services Kath Riddell apologised and said an investigation was underway.
"The question now is whether the previously used sterile gloves provided enough protection for staff, despite not being tested against the standard,"the email said.
asserted
email → provide → standard,"the
The hospital has since hired an independent organisation to test and assess the safety of the gloves and investigate the possible exposure risk to staff.
asserted
hospital → hire → staff
"We also want to acknowledge that concerns about our sterile gloves appear to have been raised many years ago," the email said.
"
asserted
email → want → gloves
We are reviewing what was raised, how it was handled and why the response differed across areas.
asserted
response → review → areas
"We are sorry for the worry this has and will cause.
asserted
this → have → worry
We understand that waiting for answers about possible exposure is especially hard when you have done this work for years."
asserted
you → understand → years
A hospital worker, who is not authorised to speak publicly, said it was a privilege to care for children with cancer and their families so it was devastating to learn about the issue.
asserted
it → authorise → issue
They're toxic, they can affect our fertility and our overall health," the worker said.
asserted
worker → affect → fertility
"Now I'm left worrying whether I've been exposed, whether my colleagues have been exposed.
asserted
colleagues → leave → ?
Union pushes for thorough probe
An RCH spokesperson said the issue was escalated to hospital leadership in late August, but did not explain how only some areas of the hospital took action a decade ago.
asserted
areas → push → action
They said RCH was committed to being open with affected staff about what it knows and what it is doing to find answers.
asserted
it → say → answers
"We will share further information with staff as it becomes available and continue to support them," the spokesperson said.
asserted
spokesperson → share → them
Maddy Harradence from the Victorian branch of the Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation said it was "completely unacceptable" for nurses and other healthcare workers to be potentially exposed.
asserted
nurses → say → Federation
They're angry, they're disappointed,"she said.
asserted
they → say → ?
Ms Harradence said the union was pushing for the hospital’s investigation to uncover the level of risk and potential exposure for staff, while also establishing effective contact tracing of all staff who wore the gloves while working with the drugs.
asserted
who → say → drugs
She said the incident has also exposed inconsistencies in standards for handling hazardous chemicals across hospitals in Victoria.
asserted
incident → say → Victoria
"It seems to me that there is a variance, particularly in cancer nursing, on when they use certain gloves, who double gloves, who doesn't double glove," Ms Harradence said.
asserted
Harradence → seem → gloves
"We actually think the regulator needs to be putting out a safety alert that says this particular glove is not chemo rated and should not be used in these areas.
asserted
glove → think → areas
"[There are] lots of learnings in relation to consistent clinical governance, consistent procedures, consistent [personal protective equipment] and mitigation of risk for us to take away from this.
asserted
us → be → this
"
HealthShare Victoria, the body responsible for procurement in Victoria's public health system, was investigating whether the gloves were being used to handle or administer cytotoxic drugs in other hospitals.
asserted
gloves → investigate → hospitals
A Victorian Health Department spokesperson confirmed they were investigating if other hospitals were also using the gloves not rated for handling chemotherapy.
asserted
hospitals → confirm → chemotherapy
"We are working with HealthShare Victoria and health services to understand whether this issue extends beyond the Royal Children's Hospital and what further action or guidance may be required," they said.
uncertain
they → work → Hospital
The Aporia