Photo via National Post

Geoff Russ: Repealing DRIPA is only the first step to fixing Eby’s reconciliation overreach

Read the original at National Post ↗
Cite

Sarkonak, J. (2026, October 2). Geoff Russ: Repealing DRIPA is only the first step to fixing Eby’s reconciliation overreach. National Post. https://nationalpost.com/opinion/geoff-russ-repealing-dripa-is-only-the-first-step-to-fixing-ebys-reconciliation-overreach

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

National Post · collected 2026-10-02 · by Jamie Sarkonak analysis

Quick Summary

Geoff Russ argues in an opinion piece that the British Columbia New Democratic Party’s (NDP) efforts to fund narratives supporting the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act (DRIPA) are politically motivated. He cites examples such as a $230,000 Canadian Heritage-funded museum exhibit and changes at the Royal B.C. Museum that frame historic land policies negatively towards private property owners. Russ contends this political campaign will lead to increased NDP control over the economy, asserting that court rulings favorable to Indigenous claims further entrench these efforts.
Written by AI on 2026-10-02, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

In British Columbia's ongoing provincial election, Geoff Russ argues that legislation like the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act (DRIPA) has had significant political and social impacts. He claims that funding narratives favorable to DRIPA, such as grants from Canadian Heritage for a Nanaimo Museum exhibit about historic railway land grants, amounts to using public money to alter perceptions of private property and economic issues. The $230,000 grant specifically aims to frame modern forestry and land ownership on Vancouver Island in the context of colonial legacies. While historical inquiry is not disputed, Russ argues that linking past "colonial policies" directly to current property owners and businesses creates a political narrative with potential consequences for reconciliation efforts and economic stability.

Written for “BC Privacy Law Repeal” on 2026-11-02, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 BC Privacy Law Repeal
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 11% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
National Post
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 2 of 35 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different topics and political figures, with no overlap in the specific events they describe.”
Toronto Star
Hedges 3 of 41 claims Outlet record 64/100
“The articles discuss different provincial issues and political contexts in British Columbia and Alberta.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
37
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
11%
4 of 37 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
60/100
National Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-02 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

National Post · 1242 article(s) · 2 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 2 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Jamie Sarkonak
24 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The human rights complaint would have proceeded in secret were it not for L.Z.’s insistence on securing a publication ban, which was granted on Oct. 13.
🔮 Later, BioWare proved it could bring its formula for rich characters, story and combat to its own original worlds.
2026-10-26 · assertive framing · Jamie Sarkonak: BioWare abandoned what made it great
🔮 It seems like only yesterday that the Toronto mayoral election appeared to be a foregone conclusion.
🔮 Barely two weeks before America’s crucial midterm elections, Black voters could very well emerge as the unanticipated kingmakers in key state races nationwide.
🔮 They also show that two weeks prior to the calling of B.C.’s snap election, the government committed to changing the province’s Forest Act to limit how much forestry companies could be compensated for tenure loss.
🔮 His lagging poll numbers may as well have been written on his face.
2026-10-15 · assertive framing · Amy Hamm: David Eby’s failure of an election debate
🔮 You’d think a municipal ward with the name “Toronto Centre” would be the last electoral district to turn its back on a left-wing incumbent.
🔮 He said he couldn’t comprehend a situation where you would choke a woman and ask her if it was that bad.
🔮 “I should have understood that supporting people who come forward about sexual violence does not require, and cannot justify, acting in ways that may lead others to conclude that unproven allegations are true or failing to give the person accused a fair opportunity to be heard and considered.”
🔮 No one is questioning historical inquiry, but using public money to draw a line from “colonial land policies” to today’s private landowners and business operators amounts to a political campaign that will have consequences.
Also by Jamie Sarkonak
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 24 articles by Jamie Sarkonak →

Topics

B.C. British Columbia’s DRIPA NDP the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act

Subjects

NDP ORG · 4× B.C. GPE · 3× Aboriginal NORP · 2× British Columbia’s GPE · 2× Canadian Heritage ORG · 1× Liberals NORP · 1× Nanaimo Museum ORG · 1× Royal B.C. Museum ORG · 1× Vancouver Island GPE · 1× Victoria GPE · 1×

Narrative

The ongoing effort to completely reshape the provincially run Royal B.C. Museum in Victoria is another example, with new displays that frame B.C.’s historic resource industries and colonial development as ecological, moral and economic disasters for Indigenous Peoples and the environment.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-02
🔮 No one is questioning historical inquiry, but using public money to draw a line from “colonial land policies” to today’s private landowners and business operators amounts to a political campaign that will have consequences.

Claims (37 extracted, 4 hedged)

In public polling, it does not rank as highly as economic issues such as the cost of living or public safety. asserted
it → rank → living
But the effects of legislation such as the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act (DRIPA), along with questions surrounding private property, have not disappeared. asserted
effects → surround → property
Accompanying DRIPA has been a concerted effort to fund narratives that favour the legislation and related policies. asserted
that → accompany → legislation
In effect, the NDP, aided by the federal Liberals, has been paying to create the social licence for altering the status of private property, land use and the economy itself in B.C. asserted
NDP → aid → B.C.
For example, Canadian Heritage has given $230,000 in funding to a travelling Nanaimo Museum exhibit about historic railway land grants, specifically framed around their “colonial” effects. asserted
Heritage → give → effects
The so-called “Great Land Grab” project was intended to portray today’s forestry and private land ownership on Vancouver Island as part of the legacy of those grants. asserted
project → call → grants
No one is questioning historical inquiry, but using public money to draw a line from “colonial land policies” to today’s private landowners and business operators amounts to a political campaign that will have consequences. asserted
that → question → consequences
The ongoing effort to completely reshape the provincially run Royal B.C. Museum in Victoria is another example, with new displays that frame B.C.’s historic resource industries and colonial development as ecological, moral and economic disasters for Indigenous Peoples and the environment. asserted
that → reshape → Peoples
That is one interpretation, a highly charged one that relegates First Nations to the role of passive victims rather than recognizing the active participants they often were in colonial history. asserted
they → relegate → history
It recasts them as something resembling an absurdly Avatar-style resistance movement. asserted
It → recast → movement
In any case, the NDP’s solution to remedy these alleged wrongs is to assert more power over the economy, which is still built on private land and resource extraction. asserted
which → remedy → land
Decisions by the courts have only compounded these developments. asserted
Decisions → compound → developments
The judiciary, which is not accountable to the public in the same way elected governments are, has handed down consequential decisions such as the B.C. Supreme Court ruling in Cowichan Tribes v. Canada. asserted
governments → elect → Canada
It recognized Aboriginal title over a swathe of land in Richmond, including privately owned land. asserted
It → recognize → land
For the record, private land ownership is also excoriated by the Royal B.C. Museum through its colonial land office display, which depicts the system that parcelled out land in the province. asserted
that → excoriate → province
That same judiciary has already rejected one property owner’s attempt to reopen the case, finding that the owner had prior knowledge of the claim and warning that reopening it could invite a flood of similar applications. uncertain
reopening → reject → applications
These decisions are very favourable to B.C.’s NDP government, whose DRIPA legislation provides mechanisms for expanding Indigenous participation in decisions affecting private property and private-sector industry. asserted
legislation → provide → property
Take it from the law firm McMillan LLP: “In Cowichan Tribes, Justice Young relied on DRIPA in supporting her conclusion that the provisions of the Land Title Act that provide ‘indefeasible’ title to private landowners do not apply to protect against Aboriginal title claims over private land. uncertain
that → take → land
Furthermore, the B.C. Court of Appeal has used DRIPA and related interpretive provisions in concluding that British Columbia’s online system for registering mineral claims under the Mineral Tenure Act was inconsistent with UNDRIP, the United Nations declaration that DRIPA implements in provincial law. uncertain
DRIPA → use → law
It can be amended or repealed through ordinary provincial legislation, subject to the Constitution. asserted
It → amend → Constitution
Yet DRIPA is now being treated as a basis for reshaping the province through government and the courts, and the NDP has happily funnelled money into what is effectively a PR campaign to embed its underlying principles in everyday life. asserted
what → treat → life
DRIPA is legislation that the NDP passed, and they can amend it as they see fit to suit their ends, or not all. asserted
they → pass → ends
Voters must make the connection sooner or later. asserted
Voters → make → connection
It is not as though they are ignorant of the broader issues surrounding property and land use. asserted
they → surround → use
Commissioned by the Public Land Use Society (PLUS), a July Abacus poll found that 86 per cent of respondents said it was important that major changes to governing authority over public lands and natural resources receive public approval before coming into effect. asserted
changes → commission → effect
An even larger share, 90 per cent, indicated that decision-making powers should be clearly disclosed and understood by the public. asserted
powers → indicate → public
Seventy-three per cent of respondents preferred that elected governments publish their own negotiating positions before entering into discussions over land and resources. asserted
governments → prefer → land
The NDP government has clearly fallen short on transparency and public disclosure, as it withheld various agreements with Indigenous governing bodies from public view prior to the last provincial election. asserted
it → fall → election
Only after the election did it resume work on them, including one potential “Foundation Agreement” with the Tahltan that would see the nation gain greater power over 11 per cent of the province’s land mass. asserted
nation → resume → mass
That proposed agreement would possibly grant the Tahltan Nation land-use authority and shared decision-making without accountability to the broader public, with DRIPA serving as part of the legal framework. uncertain
DRIPA → propose → framework
In effect, a parcel of land larger than Portugal would be largely and permanently removed from the full authority of the elected legislature. asserted
parcel → remove → legislature
A recent poll by Ipsos found that a combination of land use, property rights and DRIPA was the top issue for just six per cent of voters. asserted
combination → find → voters
However, the consequences of DRIPA and changes to land use will affect the economy, which itself is a major issue. asserted
which → affect → economy
As with taxes and public spending, land-use policy inevitably has economic consequences. asserted
policy → have → consequences
The NDP has tried to write off the controversies over DRIPA as a “culture war,” despite the fact that much of its time in government has been spent waging one with determination and purpose. asserted
much → try → determination
The NDP’s objective is to use DRIPA and public institutions to refashion the B.C. economy so that the government and its allies exercise greater control over the private sector, with that control entrenched through legislation and long-term agreements. asserted
control → use → legislation
Should the B.C. Conservatives win, they must not be shy about rolling it all back, lest they bake in the NDP’s undemocratic, self-serving reforms. asserted
they → win → reforms
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support