A dwelling completed in Caulfield South on 18 November 2014 later became the subject of a $176,297.76 County Court award.
asserted
dwelling → complete → award
Mr Fall-Armytage became the registered proprietor in May 2018 and, between June and November 2018, noticed water damage, staining, mould and leaking after heavy rainfall.
uncertain
Armytage → become → rainfall
According to Cogent Legal, his domestic building insurance claim, made in August 2023, was refused.
uncertain
claim → accord → August
The County Court ordered indemnity for 11 defects, plus temporary accommodation and storage costs.
asserted
Court → order → defects
In Victorian Building Authority v Fall-Armytage [2026] VSCA 32, the Court of Appeal allowed the appeal and dismissed the claim, except for the 11th defect, with that defect remitted to the County Court.
uncertain
defect → allow → Court
Why did the $176,297.76 insurance claim become a legal battle
Mr Fall-Armytage made a claim under the domestic building insurance policy in August 2023, and the claim was refused.
uncertain
claim → become → August
The County Court ultimately found in his favour.
asserted
Court → find → favour
It ordered that he be indemnified for the cost of rectifying 11 defects, together with temporary accommodation and storage costs.
asserted
he → order → costs
The amount ordered was $176,297.76.
asserted
amount → order → ?
The Victorian Building Authority, which had been substituted for the Victorian Managed Insurance Authority by operation of statute, sought leave to appeal.
asserted
which → substitute → leave
The appeal was confined to a single issue of construction concerning clauses 34 and 35 of the policy.
asserted
appeal → confine → policy
The policy covered the insured where the insured could not recover from the builder because of insolvency, death or disappearance.
uncertain
insured → cover → insolvency
Clause 32 was the primary indemnity provision, covering loss or damage sustained by the insured in those circumstances.
asserted
Clause → cover → circumstances
Clauses 34 and 35 dealt with the duration of cover, with clause 34 addressing non-structural defects and clause 35 addressing other causes.
asserted
clause → deal → causes
What did the court decide about when building insurance coverage applies
The central question was whether clauses 34 and 35 required the loss or damage itself to occur within the relevant period, or whether it was enough that the underlying defect or cause arose within that period, even if the insured's loss was suffered later.
asserted
loss → decide → period
Mr Fall-Armytage acquired title well after the two years for non-structural defects had expired.
asserted
years → acquire → defects
At first instance, the County Court judge considered the point finely balanced.
asserted
point → consider → instance
The judge concluded that the words "occurring during the period" in clause 34 were more naturally read as referring to the immediately preceding words, namely the non-structural defect.
asserted
words → conclude → words
The judge accepted that this created a long-tail liability for the insurer but regarded the outcome as compelled by the text.
asserted
this → accept → text
Niall CJ, McLeish JA and Whelan JA rejected that construction.
asserted
CJ → reject → construction
They held that clauses 34 and 35 are concerned with when the insured's loss, damage or expense occurs, not merely when the underlying defect or cause arises.
asserted
defect → hold → ?
According to Cogent Legal, the Court found the answer in the policy's text and structure: both clauses sat under the heading "How long are you covered for?"
uncertain
you → accord → long
The punctuation and grammar of clause 35 showed that the temporal phrase referred to "loss, damage or expense" rather than the cause; and clause 32 indemnified loss or damage sustained by the insured.
asserted
clause → show → insured
Cogent Legal adds that the Court treated broad appeals to commercial purpose and consumer protection as too general to resolve the question, and that the ministerial order made under section 135 of the Building Act 1993 (Vic) prescribed minimum cover only.
asserted
order → add → cover
How did section 9 affect the homeowner’s building insurance claim
uncertain
section → affect → claim
Mr Fall-Armytage also advanced a notice of contention.
asserted
Armytage → advance → contention
He argued that, even on the insurer's construction, the loss had occurred within the period of cover because the original owner suffered loss when the defective work was completed.
asserted
work → argue → loss
He relied on section 9 of the Domestic Building Contracts Act 1995 (Vic), under which warranties under section 8 run with the building and may be enforced by the owner for the time being as if that person were a party to the contract.
uncertain
person → rely → contract
The Court of Appeal rejected the argument.
asserted
Court → reject → argument
It held that sections 8 and 9 create statutory warranties and overcome privity, but do not authorise a successor in title to recover for loss or damage suffered by a previous owner.
asserted
successor → hold → owner
In the article's words, "Section 9 gives standing."
asserted
Section → give → standing
A later owner must still prove their own loss, which the article describes as a question of fact that may depend on matters such as whether the defect was known at the time of purchase and whether the purchase price reflected it.
uncertain
price → prove → it
On the outcome, the Court of Appeal granted leave to appeal and allowed the appeal.
asserted
Court → grant → appeal
The trial judge's orders were set aside and replaced with orders dismissing Mr Fall-Armytage's claim, except in relation to the 11th defect.
uncertain
orders → set → defect
The Court still had to classify that defect as structural or non-structural, and it remitted the issue to the County Court for further hearing and determination, as it was not in a position to decide it on the record before it.
asserted
it → have → it
The Court expressed the hope that, given the small amount involved, the issue might be resolved by agreement.
uncertain
issue → express → agreement
The Aporia
