Photo via The Guardian

AI could expose how Georgia voters cast their ballot, researchers warn

Read the original at The Guardian ↗
Cite

Chidi, G. (2026, October 2). AI could expose how Georgia voters cast their ballot, researchers warn. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/oct/02/midterms-ai-ballot-privacy

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

The Guardian · collected 2026-10-02 · by George Chidi

Quick Summary

Max Springer, a researcher from Princeton University, demonstrated that artificial intelligence could potentially reveal how voters cast their ballots in Georgia using publicly available data and an AI language model subscription costing $20. His findings indicate that with access to early voting lists and digital ballot records, he could identify the voting choices of 98.9% of in-person ballots across most counties. This has alarmed election officials ahead of upcoming midterms, prompting emergency discussions about safeguarding voter privacy by modifying data release practices.
Written by AI on 2026-10-02, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Last month, Max Springer, a postdoctoral research fellow at Princeton University’s Center for Information Technology Policy, demonstrated how easily AI could compromise ballot secrecy in Georgia. Using a $20 subscription to an AI large language model and data from an Open Records Act request, Springer identified voter ballots within hours. This revelation comes less than two weeks before early voting begins for the high-stakes US midterm elections. Ballot secrecy is crucial as it protects voters from influence or intimidation by allowing them to vote freely without fear of retribution. Election officials in Georgia are now alarmed about potential threats to this democratic safeguard posed by advanced AI technologies.

Written for “AI Voting Privacy Concerns” on 2026-11-04, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 AI Voting Privacy Concerns
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 13% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Toronto Star
Hedges 7 of 44 claims Outlet record 64/100
“The articles discuss different topics related to AI and voting secrecy in Georgia versus AI's variable responses on taxes in a potential independent Alberta.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
47
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
13%
6 of 47 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
66/100
The Guardian's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-02 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Guardian · 1979 article(s) · 6 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 6 correction(s)

Who wrote this

George Chidi
15 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 US voters will soon deliver a national verdict on the second presidency of Donald Trump.
🔮 Today, their work may be amplified by official government sources.
🔮 Trump again said that American voters would receive a $5,000 government check if Republicans hold the US House of Representatives, claiming that $21tn in foreign manufacturing investments pledged on his watch would offset the trillion-dollar cost.
🔮 ,” Ossoff said of the late civil rights icon and long-serving Georgia congressman, “Mike Collins would be grabbing a billy club.
🔮 The SLF reportedly will redirect its North Carolina spending to support Marshall.
🔮 But what if artificial intelligence could make secret votes visible?
🔮 Between 2021 and 2024, the justice department’s election threats taskforce prosecuted 21 cases, like that of Solomon Peña, a failed candidate for the New Mexico house of representatives who organized shootings at the houses of election officials, or Quintez Brown, who shot up a campaign meeting of Louisville’s mayor.
🔮 And while the city is on track for the lowest rate of homicides in decades, independent analysis argues the deployment of the national guard has had no statistically measurable impact on violent crime and that violence would have fallen in Memphis much like it has across the country in cities without similar interventions.
🔮 Justice Brett Kavanaugh filed a concurrence, ruling that he believed the government had “at least a fair prospect” of success defending the plan, but that implementation so close to election day would be “arbitrary and capricious”.
🔮 To do so on a significant scale, someone would have to be able to pick up dozens, or hundreds, of ballots from individual addresses of registered voters.
Also by George Chidi
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 15 articles by George Chidi →

Topics

Center for Information Technology Policy Georgia Open Records Act Princeton University’s the US

Subjects

Georgia GPE · 10× Springer PERSON · 4× Ben Adida PERSON · 1× Brad Raffensperger PERSON · 1× Center for Information Technology Policy ORG · 1× Congress ORG · 1× Max Springer PERSON · 1× Princeton University’s ORG · 1× state ORG · 1× the US ORG · 1×

Narrative

Last month, Max Springer, a postdoctoral research fellow at Princeton University’s Center for Information Technology Policy, tested the prospect of identifying voters based on their Georgia ballots with a $20 subscription to an AI large language model and data obtained from an Open Records Act request.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-02
🔮 But what if artificial intelligence could make secret votes visible?
2026-10-02 · The Guardian
AI could expose how Georgia voters cast their ballot, researchers warn · assertive framing

Claims (47 extracted, 6 hedged)

When voters cast their ballots, their votes are supposed to remain secret: from their family, their neighbors, and the government. asserted
votes → cast → family
But what if artificial intelligence could make secret votes visible? uncertain
votes → make → ?
Last month, Max Springer, a postdoctoral research fellow at Princeton University’s Center for Information Technology Policy, tested the prospect of identifying voters based on their Georgia ballots with a $20 subscription to an AI large language model and data obtained from an Open Records Act request. asserted
Springer → test → request
“Within a couple of hours, I had a pipeline to analyze and identify secret ballots across the state of Georgia and the agent told me exactly what further information it would need to identify real voters’ ballots,” Springer wrote. asserted
Springer → have → ballots
“At no point did the agent refuse to comply or raise concerns over implementing the exploit.” asserted
agent → refuse → exploit
The issue has raised alarms among Georgia’s election officials less than two weeks before early voting starts in the high-stakes midterm election that will determine control of the US Congress. asserted
that → raise → Congress
Ballot secrecy is a democratic safeguard, allowing voters to shield their selection from anyone who might try to influence or intimidate them into voting a certain way. uncertain
who → allow → them
But Springer’s test showed that he could use AI to find out who people voted for, using Georgia’s public election records. uncertain
people → show → records
Georgia’s state elections board held an emergency meeting on Thursday morning to discuss how artificial intelligence has made it easier to identify voters through their ballot code, leaving people more vulnerable. asserted
it → hold → people
Georgia’s outgoing secretary of state, Brad Raffensperger, locked down the tabulation data that someone might use to identify a voter, ordering any public release to redact the ID numbers after an election, which “substantially address[es] this flaw”, said Ben Adida, an MIT-trained cryptographer and the founder of the election technology non-profit VotingWorks, as he addressed the board on Thursday. uncertain
he → lock → Thursday
Election workers make a record of every voter who comes through a polling place. asserted
who → make → place
Voters then choose candidates on a touchscreen, which then prints out a paper ballot. asserted
which → choose → ballot
The voter feeds that ballot by hand into a scanner to be tabulated. asserted
voter → feed → scanner
“When a voter inserts their ballot into a tabulator, a digital record of that ballot is created. asserted
record → insert → ballot
One row is one scanned ballot. asserted
row → scan → ?
It’s often called a cast vote record, or CVR for short. asserted
It → call → ?
In order to later retrieve the CVR, the tabulator assigns a unique identifier to each CVR at the time of scanning. asserted
tabulator → retrieve → scanning
The flaw shows up in how the machine records that ballot, Adida said. asserted
Adida → show → ballot
The identifying is not actually random enough. asserted
identifying → identify → ?
Using AI, the early-voting list and the cast-vote record file for each county, Springer, the Princeton researcher who says he’s never been to Georgia, could recover the voting order for 1.52m ballots, or 98.9% of in-person ballots in 114 of the 139 counties he examined. uncertain
he → use → counties
“In some of Georgia’s counties, I can determine the exact ballot cast by every voter at the vote centers – ballot secrecy is entirely lost,” he wrote. asserted
he → determine → centers
In places with few voters on any given day, like tiny Heard county, Springer said: “the agent was able to match the majority of the 650 early in-person voters to a specific ballot, and the rest to within a single swap.” asserted
agent → give → swap
About four years ago, election security researchers had discovered a flaw in the software used by Georgia voters that could connect a voter’s identity to their secret ballot. uncertain
that → discover → ballot
The fact that ballots have an identifying number assigned at all is a product of the political paranoia attending Georgia’s elections. asserted
ballots → identify → elections
An ID number for each ballot addresses a fear of unscrupulous election workers double-stuffing ballots through tabulator machines. asserted
number → address → machines
But if the order of ballots can be paired with other information, like sign-in data when a voter checks into the precinct, or perhaps Flock camera imagery that shows when someone entered a building on a slow day, then that ballot can be synched up to a voter’s name. asserted
ballot → pair → name
Representatives of the secretary of state’s office say they have been shouting into the wind for help with this problem for three years. asserted
they → say → years
Requests for money have been bound up in the long-running political feud between Raffensperger and conservative legislators positioning themselves in the orbit of Donald Trump and 2020 election skeptics. asserted
Requests → bind → Trump
(Raffensperger has remained a top Trump target after refusing to overturn his defeat in the state’s 2020 presidential election.) asserted
Raffensperger → remain → election
Spokesperson Robert Sinners sent a litany of emails and phone records showing requests for an appropriation to upgrade Georgia’s voting system, to no avail. asserted
Sinners → send → avail
The governmental affairs committee secretary, Tim Fleming, now the Republican nominee for secretary of state, was on the receiving end of many of those requests. asserted
secretary → receive → requests
“We have presented numerous plans to the legislature for this – not, not just a patch, but an entire overhaul of the software to fix up any known vulnerabilities,” Sinners said. asserted
Sinners → present → vulnerabilities
“Guess what we were gifted with from the legislature? asserted
we → guess → legislature
Fleming did not respond to a request for comment. asserted
Fleming → respond → comment
Other states use Dominion software for their elections. asserted
states → use → elections
Every other state has either patched the software or withholds vulnerable voting data from public inspection. asserted
state → patch → inspection
Georgia law has two competing imperatives. asserted
law → have → imperatives
The Georgia constitution explicitly requires a secret ballot, and the law protecting ballot secrecy in Georgia is among the strongest in the country. asserted
law → require → country
However, Georgia law – with revisions driven by the election disputes of 2020 – also demands transparency for election records. asserted
law → drive → records
Elections board member Salleigh Grubbs raised that latter point as she circulated a draft proposal that would call for poll workers to hold ballots in a tray before voters cast them into the machine, to shuffle the printed pages out of order as a way to defeat the problem. asserted
voters → raise → problem
…and 7 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support