Anti-Ulez activist jailed for blowing up camera in ‘terrorism-linked’ explosion

Read the original at Evening Standard ↗
Cite

Kirk, T. (2026, October 3). Anti-Ulez activist jailed for blowing up camera in ‘terrorism-linked’ explosion. Evening Standard. https://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/ulez-london-sidcup-met-woolwich-crown-court-b1299388.html

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Evening Standard · collected 2026-10-03 · by Tristan Kirk

Quick Summary

Kevin Rees, a 64-year-old retired electrical appliances engineer who strongly opposed London’s Ulez scheme, was sentenced to 15 years in prison for detonating an explosive device near a Ulez camera in Sidcup, south London, on December 6, 2023. The blast caused significant damage within a 100-meter radius and narrowly missed pedestrians on a nearby bus. Counter-terrorism police were involved due to the nature of the explosion, which prompted a major investigation that identified Rees through his social media activity and physical evidence at his home.
Written by AI on 2026-10-03, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

On December 6, 2023, Kevin Rees, a 64-year-old anti-ULEZ activist from Sidcup, southeast London, detonated an explosive device near a ULEZ camera on Willersley Avenue. The explosion caused significant damage to nearby vehicles and property, including shrapnel that damaged the window frame of a child’s bedroom over 100 meters away. Despite the extensive damage, no one was injured in the blast.

Counter-terrorism police were involved in the investigation due to the nature of the attack. Rees was arrested on December 18, and officers found materials that could be used for explosives at his home. He had previously posted anti-ULEZ content on social media. At his trial, Rees expressed strong opposition to both the ULEZ scheme and Mayor Sadiq Khan.

On Friday, Judge Anthony Bate sentenced Rees to 15 years in prison with an additional year under license, citing a “terrorism connection” due to the deliberate nature of the attack on public infrastructure. The prosecution argued that this was not merely protest but a dangerous act involving explosives and showing clear planning.

Written for “Ulez Camera Bombing Trial” on 2026-11-04, grounded in this article and the 2 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Ulez Camera Bombing Trial
Crime & Law · 3 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 3% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Evening Standard
Hedges 2 of 13 claims Outlet record 64/100
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
34
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
3%
1 of 34 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
64/100
Evening Standard's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
3
Crime & Law
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-03 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Evening Standard · 8470 article(s) · 73 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 73 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Tristan Kirk
43 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 “We suggest you will be satisfied so you are sure that the six complainants told you the truth, not an invented truth, not an reimagined truth, but the real truth of what happened to them.
🔮 “We suggest you will be satisfied so you are sure that the six complainants told you the truth, not an invented truth, not an reimagined truth, but the real truth of what happened to them.
🔮 “Today it’s something that might be known as gaslighting,” she said. “A technique the defendant used to good effect.”
🔮 “Today it’s something that might be known as gaslighting,” she said. “A technique the defendant used to good effect.”
🔮 I could read about it regularly in the papers, so I was aware of it and he also told me.” Turning to their relationship now, she said: “We have a very honest, frank, and clear relationship and marriage.
🔮 I could read about it regularly in the papers, so I was aware of it and he also told me.”
🔮 I could read about it regularly in the papers, so I was aware of it and he also told me.”
🔮 Brand said he has failed to find any friends and former colleagues who would give evidence in his defence, while he recounted being blocked from visiting his baby son when he was having open heart surgery at Great Ormond Street Hospital in the wake of the 2023 allegations.
🔮 Brand said he has failed to find any friends and former colleagues who would give evidence in his defence, while he recounted being blocked from visiting his baby son when he was having open heart surgery at Great Ormond Street Hospital in the wake of the 2023 allegations.
🔮 Brand said he blames the media for his downfall after being the focus of 2023 reporting on sexual misconduct claims and he told Southwark Crown Court he has been unable to find any friends or former colleagues willing to give evidence in his defence as the trial approached. Read More
Also by Tristan Kirk
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 43 articles by Tristan Kirk →

Topics

Bexley London Sidcup Transport for London Ulez

Subjects

Rees PERSON · 10× London GPE · 4× Sidcup GPE · 3× Facebook ORG · 2× Kevin Rees PERSON · 2× Bexley GPE · 1× James Derham PERSON · 1× TfL ORG · 1× Transport for London ORG · 1× anti-Ulez PERSON · 1×

Narrative

Bethan David, former head of the Crown Prosecution Service’s counter-terrorism division, said: “This was not an act of protest or momentary vandalism. “This was a deliberate and dangerous attack involving a homemade explosive device, carried out in a residential street and designed to destroy public infrastructure. “Kevin Rees knowingly and intentionally placed an explosive device next to the Ulez camera, lit the fuse and retreated before the explosion, showing clear planning and an obvious disregard for the safety of others. “
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-03
🔮 Retired electrical appliances engineer Kevin Rees, 64, sparked a major police investigation when he detonated explosives in the Ulez camera in Willersley Avenue, Sidcup, south London, at about 6.45pm on December 6, 2023.

Claims (34 extracted, 1 hedged)

Retired electrical appliances engineer Kevin Rees, 64, sparked a major police investigation when he detonated explosives in the Ulez camera in Willersley Avenue, Sidcup, south London, at about 6.45pm on December 6, 2023. asserted
he → spark → December
The improvised explosive device damaged cars and property up to 100 metres away, with shrapnel striking the outside of a child’s bedroom. asserted
shrapnel → improvise → bedroom
Counter-terrorism police were drafted in to investigate the blast, and they identified Rees – a prolific poster of anti-Ulez social media content – as the prime suspect. asserted
they → draft → suspect
Read More He was sentenced to 15 years in prison on Friday. asserted
He → read → Friday
Detective Chief Superintendent James Derham, who leads local policing in the Bexley area, said: “It was miraculous that nobody was killed or seriously injured in the large explosion caused by Rees. “He showed a complete disregard for the welfare and safety of the people who live in, or were travelling through, the area at the time of the explosion – all because he was unhappy with the Ulez scheme. asserted
he → lead → scheme
“CCTV from a bus travelling down the road at the time shows how it narrowly missed the blast of debris by seconds.” asserted
it → travel → seconds
The Ulez scheme, which requires drivers to pay a daily charge based on how polluting the emissions from their vehicle are, faced local opposition after it was expanded to cover all of London in 2023. asserted
it → require → 2023
Cameras are used by Transport for London (TfL) to monitor the cars that enter and exit the zone, triggering fines for motorists who have not paid the daily charge. asserted
who → use → charge
During the trial, Rees told the court he “strongly opposed” the Ulez scheme – and London Mayor Lord Sadiq Khan. asserted
he → tell → scheme
“I dislike him, dislike what he has done to London,” the defendant said. asserted
defendant → dislike → London
A jury heard the investigation team identified that Rees had travelled in his Smart car from his home in Sidcup to Shuttle Close shortly after 6.20pm on December 6, 2023. asserted
Rees → hear → December
The Ulez camera was installed earlier that day, but in an unrelated incident had been cut down by another individual, who was also identified and convicted. asserted
who → instal → individual
Rees walked the short distance from his car to the camera and then planted the device and lit a fuse, police said. asserted
police → walk → fuse
He was then seen by a witness walking quickly away from the scene. asserted
He → see → scene
Rees was identified and was arrested on December 18, 2023 and his home was searched. Detectives also analysed Rees’s social media activity and found he had posted numerous times about Ulez cameras and encouraged the damaging of them, the Met said. asserted
Met → identify → them
Three homemade stun guns were found at his address. asserted
guns → find → address
On Friday, Rees was given a three-year sentence, to run concurrently, after he admitted three counts of having a prohibited weapon. asserted
he → give → weapon
During the trial, the defendant denied all involvement in the incident, telling jurors he believed his arrest was linked to his participation in “anti-Ulez” groups on Facebook. asserted
arrest → deny → Facebook
When he was arrested by counter-terror police on December 18, Rees made reference to that explosion and asked officers if his arrest had “something to do with the anti-Ulez sites”. asserted
arrest → arrest → sites
“There was only one explosion that was on the news and that was the one in Sidcup,” he told the trial, before adding: “I assumed it was just the so-called Facebook police. “ asserted
it → be → trial
People you hear being arrested for making bad or inappropriate comments on Facebook pages – that’s well-known, as it’s been on the news. asserted
it → hear → news
“The thing is, I didn’t actually do anything wrong.” asserted
I → do → anything
Rees told jurors he joined “anti-Ulez” Facebook groups and pages out of “boredom” and because it provided him with a sense of community. asserted
it → tell → community
Bethan David, former head of the Crown Prosecution Service’s counter-terrorism division, said: “This was not an act of protest or momentary vandalism. “This was a deliberate and dangerous attack involving a homemade explosive device, carried out in a residential street and designed to destroy public infrastructure. “Kevin Rees knowingly and intentionally placed an explosive device next to the Ulez camera, lit the fuse and retreated before the explosion, showing clear planning and an obvious disregard for the safety of others. “ asserted
Rees → say → others
Whatever his views on the Ulez scheme, Kevin Rees crossed a serious line by constructing a homemade bomb and detonating it in a public place. asserted
Rees → cross → place
“It was pure chance that no-one suffered serious injury, or worse. asserted
one → suffer → injury
“The Crown Prosecution Service will always seek to prosecute dangerous offending of this nature and hopefully this conviction sends a clear message to other protesters considering taking the law into their own hands.” asserted
conviction → seek → hands
Rees, of Harcourt Avenue, Sidcup, was sentenced at the Old Bailey on Friday by Judge Anthony Bate. asserted
Rees → sentence → Bate
Siwan Hayward, TfL’s director of security, policing and enforcement, said: “This was a reckless and highly dangerous act that could have caused serious harm and resulted in the loss of life. uncertain
that → say → life
We welcome this sentencing and hope it acts as a warning to others. asserted
it → welcome → others
“Tampering with or damaging TfL’s property is unacceptable and seriously risks the safety of the public. asserted
Tampering → tamper → public
Those attempting to interfere with Ulez infrastructure show a complete disregard for the law. asserted
Those → attempt → law
“All vandalised cameras are repaired or replaced as soon as possible. asserted
cameras → vandalise → ?
Any such incident on our network is reported to the police and will not stop the Ulez operating.” asserted
incident → report → police
💬Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

🕘History 🎫Support