Photo via The Independent

Trump aide Natalie Harp played major role to ensure he was properly glorified in taxpayer-funded ads: report

Read the original at The Independent ↗
Cite

Lang, A. (2026, October 4). Trump aide Natalie Harp played major role to ensure he was properly glorified in taxpayer-funded ads: report. The Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-natalie-harp-ads-taxpayer-funded-b3061109.html

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

The Independent · collected 2026-10-04 · by Alex Lang

Quick Summary

Natalie Harp, President Donald Trump’s aide, played a significant role in creating taxpayer-funded ads that glorified Trump. According to a report by the New York Times, during an Oval Office meeting on August 7, Trump directed Harp to showcase videos and images favorable to him, which were later used in government-funded advertisements. These ads, costing $20 million from the Department of Homeland Security, began airing in September and have faced criticism for their political nature despite being described by the White House as public service announcements aimed at promoting patriotism.
Written by AI on 2026-10-04, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

In mid-October 2018, the Trump administration began airing a series of ads on major networks like Fox News and CBS that praised President Trump's achievements. These ads were funded by taxpayer money and included phrases such as "Paid for by the U.S. Government." The first ad aired on Fox News, denouncing communism while highlighting domestic manufacturing, tax cuts, and law enforcement support.

The ad featured images of Trump at various events with patriotic music in the background and text stating, “America will never be a communist country.” It drew criticism from Democrats like Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD), who accused it of violating federal rules against using government funds for political campaigns. Raskin said such use could constitute "felony criminal theft" and violate the Hatch Act.

By October 19, AdImpact reported that spending on these ads had increased from $14,000 to $430,000 over three days, running in markets across the country. The White House defended the ad as a "public service announcement," arguing it was educational and patriotic rather than political.

Critics argue that with midterm elections approaching, these ads blur the line between government messaging and campaign propaganda, raising concerns about ethical violations and misuse of taxpayer dollars.

Written for “Taxpayer Funded Pro-Trump Ads” on 2026-11-02, grounded in this article and the 43 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Taxpayer Funded Pro-Trump Ads
Politics · 44 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 7% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans right further right than this Hedges 3 of 19 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles describe different aspects of the issue: one focuses on Trump's defense regarding the legality and nature of the ads, while the other discusses Natalie Harp's role in creating the taxpayer-funded ads.”
Daily Mail
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 2 of 32 claims Outlet record 68/100
“Article A discusses the defense of using taxpayer money for ads glorifying Trump, while Article B focuses on Natalie Harp's role in creating these ads during a meeting with advisors. Though related, they describe different aspects and occurrences.”
The Straits Times
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 1 of 2 claims Outlet record 66/100
The Sydney Morning Herald
⚖️ Leans right further right than this Hedges 3 of 34 claims Outlet record 61/100
“The articles describe different aspects of related events involving Donald Trump's use of taxpayer-funded ads but do not report on the exact same specific incident.”
Daily Mail
⚖️ Leans right further right than this Hedges 2 of 37 claims Outlet record 68/100
“The articles describe different aspects and outcomes related to taxpayer-funded ads for Trump but do not clearly refer to the same specific incident.”
The Guardian
Hedges 6 of 59 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A describes a meeting where Trump pressured advisors to spend money on ads, while Article B reports on Trump's decision to stop using taxpayer funds for self-promoting ads after backlash.”
The Straits Times
⚖️ Leans right further right than this Hedges 0 of 14 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles describe different stages or aspects of a series of events related to Trump's political advertisements, not the exact same incident.”
Daily Mail
Hedges 1 of 7 claims Outlet record 68/100
“The articles describe different interactions involving Natalie Harp and Donald Trump on separate occasions.”
CBS News
⚖️ Centre further right than this Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 66/100
“While both articles discuss taxpayer-funded ads for President Trump, they describe different aspects of the campaign: Article A focuses on the White House defending the use of funds, while Article B details Natalie Harp's role in creating the ads.”
CBS News
Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A discusses the general funding of pro-Trump ads with taxpayer dollars, while Article B focuses on Natalie Harp's role in creating these ads and mentions a specific meeting involving Trump.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
30
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
7%
2 of 30 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
59/100
The Independent's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
44
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-04 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Independent · 3499 article(s) · 8 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 8 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Alex Lang
15 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Eleven counties are set to vote on non-binding referenda this year to secede from Cook County.
🔮 Maybe some that you didn’t expect, but certainly a lot of press,” Fox host Aishah Hasnie quipped.
🔮 A friend to all of us and a beloved member of our law enforcement family.” Funeral services for Sherifi are expected to be held next week.
🔮 He told them they could find the gun nearby.
🔮 Krantz stated that investigators may never find answers for why the teenager targeted the school.
🔮 A fight over a bandana in West Virginia may have kicked off a series of events that led to a murder and now an arrest, a decade later.
🔮 The White House argued in the documents that the contract couldn’t be competitively bid because of the timing and the uniqueness of the ceilings.
🔮 The sheriff seemed at a loss for words over the allegation, telling WFLA: “Who would think that we would have to have undercover investigations at children’s sporting events because they’re gambling?
🔮 “That’s all I could hear over the sound of Marine One,” she added.
🔮 Some of her injuries may be permanent, according to the report, but it did not elaborate further on how she was injured.
Also by Alex Lang
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 15 articles by Alex Lang →

Topics

Independent Political Action Committee Republican the New York Times the White House

Subjects

Trump PERSON · 14× Harp PERSON · 5× the White House ORG · 3× Independent NORP · 2× Donald Trump’s PERSON · 1× Natalie Harp PERSON · 1× Political Action Committee ORG · 1× Republican NORP · 1× White House ORG · 1× the New York Times ORG · 1×

Narrative

However, Trump turned the meeting’s attention to himself and asked Harp to show videos and images that he favors, the New York Times reported. She then showed a series of videos created by the White House digital team that glorified Trump, the report noted.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-04
🔮 One of the videos even included UFC president Dana White praising Trump - a quote that would later appear in the ads.

Claims (30 extracted, 2 hedged)

Donald Trump’s always-present aide, Natalie Harp, helped him create taxpayer-funded ads that glorified the president, according to a report. uncertain
that → help → report
On August 7, Trump met with advisors and Republican strategists in the Oval Office to pressure him to spend money from his Political Action Committee to help candidates in the midterms. asserted
Trump → meet → midterms
However, Trump turned the meeting’s attention to himself and asked Harp to show videos and images that he favors, the New York Times reported. She then showed a series of videos created by the White House digital team that glorified Trump, the report noted. asserted
report → turn → Trump
One of the videos even included UFC president Dana White praising Trump - a quote that would later appear in the ads. asserted
that → include → ads
While Trump made it clear he planned to travel and support candidates, he wanted himself to be front and center in the commercials - something that has been met with extreme backlash. asserted
that → make → backlash
Since September, Trump has been running ads during football games, on news networks, and on other outlets that are “paid for by the U.S. government.” asserted
that → run → government
The ads have glorified Trump and his policies. asserted
ads → glorify → Trump
Taxpayers are funding the ads. asserted
Taxpayers → fund → ads
Outrage has grown over the ads and their political nature, even as the White House describes them as public service announcements. asserted
House → grow → announcements
The first ads began airing in early September in the Washington, D.C., market, to make sure Trump could see them, the Times noted. uncertain
Times → begin → them
After that, they began airing across the country using $20 million from the Department of Homeland Security. asserted
they → begin → Security
That included the infamous “Love me” ad that included Trump stating that America would never be a communist country. asserted
America → include → Trump
Trump has defended the ads despite mounting criticism. asserted
Trump → defend → criticism
“If somebody said that that’s wrong, I’ll gladly pay the money,” he said last week. asserted
he → say → money
“But these are ads for the country,” he added. asserted
he → add → country
“You have to understand. asserted
You → have → ?
I’m not promoting a candidate. asserted
I → promote → candidate
I’m not promoting myself because I’m not running for office. asserted
I → promote → office
I’m promoting the country.” asserted
I → promote → country
The White House has previously told The Independent: “These public service announcements are about reminding Americans to love their country and understand what makes it worth defending, at home, at our borders and abroad.” asserted
it → tell → borders
The Independent has reached out to the White House about Harp’s role’s in creating the ads. asserted
Independent → reach → ads
She serves as Trump’s personal aide and has been seen traveling with him. asserted
She → serve → him
However, that has raised concerns given her close proximity to the president. asserted
that → raise → president
She has been dubbed the “human printer” for printing off messages and social media posts for the president to see. asserted
president → dub → messages
Harp has also acted as a gatekeeper to Trump, with some using her to get their messages to the president. asserted
some → act → president
That has raised concerns among Democrats and others who question her role and her ability to screen the messages Trump sees. asserted
Trump → raise → messages
Georgia Democrat Sen. Jon Ossoff pushed Harp into the spotlight by claiming that Trump wanted to spend more time with her than helping the country. asserted
Trump → push → country
“He golfs and trades stocks,” Ossoff said in August. asserted
Ossoff → golf → August
“See, he doesn’t want to do the job. asserted
he → see → job
He wants to build his ballroom and travel with Natalie on their apparently defenseless flying palace gifted by the emir of Qatar.” asserted
He → want → Qatar
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support