Photo via New York Post

J.J. McCarthy active for Giants vs. Cardinals in Week 4 surprise

Read the original at New York Post ↗
Cite

Dunleavy, R. (2026, October 4). J.J. McCarthy active for Giants vs. Cardinals in Week 4 surprise. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2026/10/04/sports/j-j-mccarthy-active-for-giants-vs-cardinals-in-week-4-surprise/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

New York Post · collected 2026-10-04 · by Ryan Dunleavy

Quick Summary

The New York Giants unexpectedly activated quarterback J.J. McCarthy for their Week 4 game against the Arizona Cardinals along with two other quarterbacks already on their roster. This move suggests the possibility of McCarthy playing in specific situations, such as short-yardage scenarios where his running ability could be advantageous. Head coach Matt Nagy indicated that McCarthy’s role will depend on how much he can handle during practice and preparation leading up to game time.
Written by AI on 2026-10-04, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

The Giants surprised fans by activating three quarterbacks for their Week 4 game against the Cardinals, including third-string quarterback J.J. McCarthy, who is now a potential backup if starter Jameis Winston and second-stringer Jake Haener are ruled out. By putting McCarthy on the active roster, the Giants indicate they might use him in specific plays or as the emergency backup. This move comes despite not having to make McCarthy inactive due to his spot on the 53-man roster. The team's inactives for Sunday include safety Ar’Darius Washington, running back Devin Singletary, cornerback Nikko Reed, defensive lineman Jihad Ward, tight end Thomas Fidone II, and defensive tackle Bobby Jamison-Travis. Offensive coordinator Matt Nagy noted that McCarthy’s role will depend on his daily readiness.

Written for “Jj McCarthy Activated Giants” on 2026-11-01, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Jj McCarthy Activated Giants
Sports · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 25% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
New York Post
Hedges 0 of 26 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles refer to different time periods and situations regarding J.J. McCarthy's involvement with the Giants.”
Fox News
Hedges 4 of 38 claims Outlet record 69/100
“Article A discusses the overall context and expectations for an upcoming game between the Cardinals and the Giants, while Article B focuses on a specific surprise decision regarding player activation for that game.”
New York Post
Hedges 1 of 4 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A discusses J.J. McCarthy's opportunity with the New York Giants and his background, while Article B reports on a specific decision by the Giants to activate McCarthy for an upcoming game against the Cardinals.”
New York Post
Hedges 2 of 31 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the upcoming game between the Giants and Cardinals in Week 4 but do not describe the same specific incident or occurrence.”
New York Post
Hedges 0 of 23 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different events related to NFL quarterback situations but refer to distinct games and preparations against different teams.”
New York Post
Hedges 1 of 11 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A describes J.J. McCarthy's first appearance in a Giants uniform during practice, while Article B discusses McCarthy being active for an upcoming game against the Cardinals.”
New York Post
Hedges 0 of 12 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A discusses McCarthy's shock at being traded by the Vikings and his new role as Jameis Winston's backup for the Giants, while Article B reports on McCarthy being activated as a player for an upcoming game against the Cardinals.”
New York Post
Hedges 1 of 21 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the Giants' preparations and roster status for their Week 4 game against the Cardinals but do not describe the same specific incident.”
New York Post
Hedges 0 of 16 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A discusses how to watch the Cardinals vs. Giants game and recaps recent events, while Article B focuses on a surprise roster move regarding J.J. McCarthy's activation for the same upcoming game.”
New York Post
Hedges 0 of 3 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss related developments concerning J.J. McCarthy's status with the Giants but describe different moments in time.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
8
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
25%
2 of 8 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
66/100
New York Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Sports
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-04 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

New York Post · 15765 article(s) · 35 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 35 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Ryan Dunleavy
69 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Tanking would make sense — if the Colts hadn’t previously traded their first-round pick to the Jets.
🔮 If John Harbaugh were picking between two Michigan-bred quarterbacks this week, the Giants would start J.J. McCarthy over Tom Brady.
🔮 Edmunds will go from logging every defensive snap in the first six games to missing every snap in the final 11, The Post confirmed, after he was injured late in last week’s game against the Saints.
🔮 Maybe it’s time for the NFL to change its logo to include a player’s hand punching at the football that sits atop the shield.
🔮 “Maybe now 20 percent of that 30 that was gone is back,” Nagy said before Thursday’s practice.
🔮 McCarthy’s last pass — on fourth-and-1 from the 14-yard line with 12 seconds remaining — fell incomplete or else the Giants would’ve had a chance to win the game or send it to overtime despite trailing 34-10 when the quarterback change was made with 11:36 to go.
🔮 tRY IT NOW“I would love for us to be in that kind of a circumstance,” Harbaugh said.
🔮 If J.J. McCarthy was guaranteed to throw for 943 yards, rush for 104 yards and lead 12 scoring drives in his next start, then the Giants wouldn’t have a quarterback controversy on their hands.
🔮 “I’m feeling good,” Mauigoa said, indicating he will be on the field again soon.
🔮 Skattebo knew ahead of Sunday’s game that he was not going to start and that his playing time would be diminished as a result of four fumbles in the first five games, but he wasn’t expecting to be limited to six offensive snaps (all in the first half) and no touches in the 34-27 loss to the Saints.
Also by Ryan Dunleavy
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 69 articles by Ryan Dunleavy →

Topics

Cardinals Giants

Subjects

Giants ORG · 8× McCarthy PERSON · 5× Cardinals ORG · 1× Haener PERSON · 1× J.J. McCarthy PERSON · 1× Jake Haener PERSON · 1× Jameis Winston PERSON · 1× Jaxson Dart’s PERSON · 1× Paul Schwartz PERSON · 1× Winston PERSON · 1×

Narrative

The Giants’ inactives include safety Ar’Darius Washington, running back Devin Singletary, cornerback Nikko Reed, defensive lineman Jihad Ward, tight end Thomas Fidone II and defensive tackle Bobby Jamison-Travis.
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-04
🔮 tRY IT NOWBecause McCarthy is on the 53-man roster, the Giants could have made McCarthy inactive and still used him as the emergency third-stringer if the starter and backup (Jameis Winston and Jake Haener) are ruled out.
2026-10-04 · New York Post
J.J. McCarthy active for Giants vs. Cardinals in Week 4 surprise · mixed framing

Claims (8 extracted, 2 hedged)

Are the Giants planning a package of plays for J.J. McCarthy? asserted
Giants → plan → McCarthy
In a surprise twist, the Giants activated three quarterbacks, including McCarthy, for Sunday’s game against the Cardinals. asserted
Giants → activate → Cardinals
tRY IT NOWBecause McCarthy is on the 53-man roster, the Giants could have made McCarthy inactive and still used him as the emergency third-stringer if the starter and backup (Jameis Winston and Jake Haener) are ruled out. uncertain
starter → try → stringer
By not doing that, the Giants have opened the door for McCarthy to be the backup — or for him to play in a select set of plays. asserted
him → do → plays
Haener was elevated from the practice squad Saturday. asserted
Haener → elevate → squad
The Giants’ inactives include safety Ar’Darius Washington, running back Devin Singletary, cornerback Nikko Reed, defensive lineman Jihad Ward, tight end Thomas Fidone II and defensive tackle Bobby Jamison-Travis. asserted
inactives → include → Washington
“We just have to see each and every day how much can he handle,” Giants offensive coordinator Matt Nagy said this week when asked about McCarthy possibly playing a small role, “and then we continue to throw more and more at him. uncertain
we → have → him
And then we have to make our own judgment on, ‘Now, what is he doing on the field, and where does that take him as a No. 2 or No. 3?'” asserted
that → have → .
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support