Photo via CBS News

Transcript: Zach Lahn, Iowa GOP nominee for governor, on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan," Oct. 4, 2026

Read the original at CBS News ↗
Cite

Transcript: Zach Lahn, Iowa GOP nominee for governor, on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan," Oct. 4, 2026. (2026, October 4). CBS News. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/zach-lahn-iowa-gop-nominee-governor-face-the-nation-transcript-10-04-2026/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

CBS News · collected 2026-10-04

Quick Summary

Zach Lahn, the Republican nominee for governor of Iowa, appeared on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan" on October 4, 2026, to discuss diesel prices and President Trump’s trade policies impacting farmers. Lahn criticized the consolidation in agriculture that has led to monopolies, which he says have made farmers price takers rather than price makers. He also proposed breaking up big agribusinesses and taxing Wall Street hedge funds that own farmland, arguing these are traditionally Republican principles like those championed by Teddy Roosevelt's antitrust efforts.
Written by AI on 2026-10-04, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

On October 4, 2026, CBS News' *Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan* featured Secretary of Energy Chris Wright, Democratic Senator Mark Kelly from Arizona, former White House national security official Brett McGurk, Republican Iowa gubernatorial nominee Zach Lahn, and CBS News chief legal correspondent Jan Crawford. The show discussed new CBS polling ahead of the midterm elections, focusing on the competitive races in various states like Iowa and Arizona. Senator Kelly emphasized that Democrats are optimistic about capturing the House but face tougher battles in Senate races, noting voter frustration with Washington D.C.'s lack of responsiveness to pressing issues such as rising living costs. McGurk's interview explored the complex dynamics between Israel, Saudi Arabia, and Iran, touching on past events like the October 7th Hamas attack and the potential normalization of relations between Israel and Saudi Arabia.

Written for “Face The Nation October 4 Interviews” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 13 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Face The Nation October 4 Interviews
Politics · 14 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 5% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
CBS News
Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 66/100
CBS News
Hedges 0 of 1 claims Outlet record 66/100
CBS News
Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 66/100
CBS News
Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 66/100
NBC News
⚖️ Leans right further right than this Hedges 0 of 46 claims Outlet record 60/100
“Article A reports on an interview with Zach Lahn on October 4th, while Article B describes a debate between Zach Lahn and Rob Sand on October 7th.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
56
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
5%
3 of 56 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
66/100
CBS News's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
14
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-04 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

CBS News · 4280 article(s) · 6 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 6 correction(s)

Who wrote this

No reporter is named on this article.

Topics

Canada GOP Iowa Republican Republicans

Subjects

Iowa GPE · 9× Zach Lahn PERSON · 6× MARGARET BRENNAN PERSON · 4× Republican NORP · 2× Republicans NORP · 2× Trump PERSON · 2× Canada GPE · 1× China GPE · 1× GOP ORG · 1× Margaret PERSON · 1×

Narrative

So, we are focused on providing incentives to farmers, real incentives, to adopt different types of practices to allow them the ability to really change what they're doing to stop these products from getting into the streams in the first place, clean up our water at the source, and help farmers make sure that they're not losing money by doing it by providing real incentives that help them actually make money by adopting these practices.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-04
🔮 Well, I would just say first that I was one of the first people to come out and say that this was the wrong move to sign that executive order.

Claims (56 extracted, 3 hedged)

The following is the transcript of the interview with Zach Lahn, Iowa GOP nominee for governor, that aired on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan" on Oct. 4, 2026. asserted
that → follow → Oct.
We turn now to the Republican running for governor of Iowa, Zach Lahn. asserted
We → turn → Iowa
He joins us from Belle Plaine. asserted
He → join → Plaine
We look at diesel prices. asserted
We → look → prices
President Trump's trade war with Canada and China have made things expensive for farmers. asserted
things → make → farmers
You know that well in Iowa. asserted
You → know → Iowa
I think when you talk about what's going on with affordability for farmers, and by the way, this is something we launched our campaign on in the beginning. asserted
we → think → beginning
You have to take a step back and really understand what's been going on for decades in the agriculture industry, where we've seen consolidation after consolidation of businesses taking choice and competition away from farmers, we've reached monopoly stages there. asserted
we → have → stages
And now what we're seeing with some of the increased prices on diesel is kind of just another one of these pieces that's adding up to that. asserted
that → see → that
And we've been focused, you know, in the state on how do we cut the gas tax and other priorities to help farmers have more affordable fuel when they go into harvest. asserted
they → focus → harvest
So this has been a part of our campaign since the very beginning, and I really think farmers understand that for a long time they have been treated as price takers, and really the deck has been stacked against them. asserted
deck → think → them
And now when you add in the higher cost of diesel, we really have a problem. asserted
we → add → problem
Well - you just mentioned there big AG. asserted
you → mention → AG
You are campaigning with a promise to break up big AG monopolies. asserted
You → campaign → monopolies
You said you're going to tax the heck out of Wall Street hedge funds that own farmland. asserted
that → say → farmland
Those sound more typically like progressive policies than conservative ones. asserted
Those → sound → ones
How do you convince Iowa Republicans? asserted
you → convince → Republicans
Well, I just say that, you know, breaking up monopolies was first done by Republicans. asserted
breaking → say → Republicans
Teddy Roosevelt broke up two of the biggest companies in existence. asserted
Roosevelt → break → existence
I think we forgot that in large part, and now we're paying the consequence for it. asserted
we → think → it
So my priority is to increase the funding to the Attorney General's office to take on these anti-competitive lawsuits because farmers across the country are waiting for someone to take the first step here and really give them a fair deal, and so I think that these are ideals of the Republican Party. asserted
these → increase → Party
But really, they're just the right ideas, the right thing to do. asserted
they → do → ?
It's - it's an interesting position, though, given that the party has typically been very close to the agriculture industry. asserted
party → give → industry
I know you have focused in your campaign on the cancer rate in Iowa. asserted
you → know → Iowa
It has the second highest cancer incidence in this country. asserted
It → have → country
You say it's nitrates and pesticides, including glyphosate, that cause it. asserted
that → say → it
President Trump signed an executive order to boost production of glyphosate based herbicides. asserted
Trump → sign → herbicides
How do you reconcile those presidential decisions from the policy you have? asserted
you → reconcile → policy
Well, I would just say first that I was one of the first people to come out and say that this was the wrong move to sign that executive order. asserted
this → say → order
I think that if we could give the president the advice on that, that he would understand that better. uncertain
he → think → that
But what we have focused on a campaign that's focused on Iowa issues specifically asserted
that → focus → Iowa
, and this is something that Iowans are facing. asserted
Iowans → face → that
We have the fastest rate of new cancer anywhere in the country, number one. asserted
We → have → country
And if you move out of the state of Iowa to say a state like Nevada, your chance of getting cancer any given year goes down by 40 percent. asserted
chance → move → percent
These are very specific Iowa based issues, and we've been focused on them. asserted
we → base → them
High nitrate load in water is one of the top causes of colon cancer, bladder cancer, ovarian cancer, and we've got some of the highest levels in the country, if not the highest levels. asserted
we → get → country
So, we are focused on providing incentives to farmers, real incentives, to adopt different types of practices to allow them the ability to really change what they're doing to stop these products from getting into the streams in the first place, clean up our water at the source, and help farmers make sure that they're not losing money by doing it by providing real incentives that help them actually make money by adopting these practices. asserted
them → provide → practices
Because it really goes back to farmers are operating on razor-thin margins right now, and the idea to experiment with something new is not very appealing when you could be the first in a line of five generations that loses your family farm. uncertain
that → go → farm
Right and that's one of the arguments - for continuing to use this herbicide that has arguably ties to - cancer. asserted
that → continue → cancer
Is that it's just frankly cheap - Your position -- ZACH LAHN: Okay -- MARGARET BRENNAN: -- You just said if the president had more information, maybe make a different decision. asserted
president → say → decision
…and 16 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support