Photo via Evening Standard

Zack Polanski barred from Israel after ‘Zionism is racism’ made party policy

Read the original at Evening Standard ↗
Cite

Lithgow, G. (2026, October 4). Zack Polanski barred from Israel after ‘Zionism is racism’ made party policy. Evening Standard. https://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/green-party-zionism-zack-polanski-israel-jewish-b1299497.html

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Evening Standard · collected 2026-10-04 · by George Lithgow

Quick Summary

Israel has barred Zack Polanski, leader of Britain’s Green Party, from entering the country following a decision at the party conference to treat Zionism as any other form of racism. The resolution, supported by 1,022 votes over 813 against, also advocates for a single democratic Palestinian state and criticizes Israel's treatment of Palestinians. While Polanski maintains that supporting Palestinian rights does not conflict with Jewish rights, Israel’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs views the policy as antisemitic according to the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance definition.
Written by AI on 2026-10-04, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

The Green Party of England and Wales adopted a policy at its annual conference on October 1, 2026, equating Zionism with racism. The motion also calls for the establishment of a single democratic Palestinian state encompassing all of historic Palestine, including Jerusalem as its capital. This move has sparked significant backlash from various quarters:

In response to this controversy, Zack Polanski, leader of the Green Party, issued a statement asserting that the party will protect both Palestinian rights and Jewish communities. He emphasized distinguishing between criticism of Israel and antisemitism while reiterating his commitment to ensuring everyone feels safe and welcome within the party.

The decision has also drawn international attention, with the United States reportedly set to make representations regarding the policy's implications for anti-Semitism in Britain. This move reflects the global concern over the potential ramifications of such policies on Jewish communities internationally.

Written for “Green Party Zionism Vote Controversy” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 35 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Green Party Zionism Vote Controversy
Politics · 36 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 2% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Al Jazeera
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 1 of 19 claims Outlet record 60/100
Evening Standard
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 2 of 29 claims Outlet record 65/100
Daily Mail
Hedges 2 of 30 claims Outlet record 68/100
Evening Standard
Hedges 5 of 24 claims Outlet record 65/100
“Article A describes the lead-up and context of an upcoming debate at the Green Party conference about Zionism, while Article B reports on a consequence (Zack Polanski being barred from Israel) after the motion was made party policy following the conference.”
Evening Standard
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 1 of 16 claims Outlet record 65/100
“While both articles discuss a controversial motion on Zionism at the Green Party's annual conference, Article B focuses on Israel barring Zack Polanski from entering the country as a result of the party's policy decision, which is not covered in Article A.”
National Post
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 1 of 13 claims Outlet record 60/100
The Hindu
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 1 of 17 claims Outlet record 60/100
“While both articles discuss the Green Party's vote to classify Zionism as racism, ARTICLE B focuses on Zack Polanski and Israel's reaction, which appears to be a separate or subsequent development rather than the same specific incident.”
Evening Standard
Hedges 0 of 25 claims Outlet record 65/100
“While both articles discuss Israel's reaction to a Green Party policy motion, they describe different stages or reactions (Israel's ministry statement vs. chief rabbi's condemnation), indicating separate reporting on related events rather than the same specific incident.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
40
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
2%
1 of 40 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
65/100
Evening Standard's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
36
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
3
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-04 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Evening Standard · 7865 article(s) · 64 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 64 correction(s)

Who wrote this

George Lithgow
30 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Devolution has been a centrepoint of the Prime Minister’s agenda since his march to Downing Street in the summer, and he has insisted giving more control to regional mayors and authorities across England will help to boost economic growth.
🔮 Devolution has been a centrepoint of the Prime Minister’s agenda since his march to Downing Street in the summer, and he has insisted giving more control to regional mayors and authorities across England will help to boost economic growth.
🔮 Thousands of Christmas shoppers on London’s Oxford Street will have their faces scanned by live facial recognition cameras, with the technology due to be installed in December, just in time for the festive shopping rush.
🔮 Thousands of Christmas shoppers on London’s Oxford Street will have their faces scanned by live facial recognition cameras, with the technology due to be installed in December, just in time for the festive shopping rush.
🔮 Prime Minister Andy Burnham initially resisted calls to limit the early release scheme further after it emerged that Albert Bowers and Jessie Cole, who were convicted of Pc Harper’s manslaughter in 2020, would be eligible from next year.
🔮 A decision on Jackdaw is “imminent”, but Rosebank is set to take “a bit longer”, Energy Secretary Miatta Fahnbulleh said on Thursday. The outcome will be seen by environmentalists as a key test of Mr Burnham’s credibility on climate change. He added: “We’re not backing away from them, but that’s a matter that will be addressed in due course.” The UK Government is considering whether to grant permission for the two projects, which were initially approved by the previous Conservative administration before the courts ruled the full environmental impacts of the fossil fuels drilled should be taken into account. Speaking on the BBC’s Radio Scotland Breakfast programme on Friday, Mr Alexander said: “Our predecessors, the Conservatives, made such a mess of the process of approval, both for Jackdaw and Rosebank, that they ended up in court. “And that’s why we are cautious, careful, and often quite circumspect in what we say publicly about these decisions, because we don’t want to see further delay as a result of more court action. “I’m careful in what I say publicly because we don’t want to make the same mistakes as our Conservative predecessors, which led to the whole programme being delayed as a consequence of judicial challenge.” He said he “welcomed” Ms Fahnbulleh’s announcement that a decision on Jackdaw is imminent – but refused to be drawn on whether a decision had been made yet, or when an announcement would be made. Read More “The decision is on Miatta’s desk.
🔮 It was quite amazing actually, and I could see how personally moved he was by that.
🔮 It was quite amazing actually, and I could see how personally moved he was by that.
🔮 Conservative shadow justice secretary Nick Timothy said the majority of prisoners were not being tagged before release, despite assurances from the Government that the tagging system would be the “toughest in history”.
🔮 Security arrangements for high-profile public figures including politicians and royals will be reviewed urgently after the killing of Ann Widdecombe and other recent events, Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood has said.
Also by George Lithgow
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 30 articles by George Lithgow →

Topics

Greens Israel Jewish Palestinian the Green Party

Subjects

Jewish NORP · 6× the Green Party ORG · 6× Israel GPE · 5× Green Party ORG · 4× Greens ORG · 4× Palestinian NORP · 3× Polanski PERSON · 2× Zionists NORP · 2× the State of Israel GPE · 2× Holborn GPE · 1×

Narrative

The chief executives of the Board of Deputies, Community Security Trust and Jewish Leadership Council wrote a letter to Green Party leaders ahead of the conference airing their concerns and referring back to a warning they issued over the motion earlier this year. “We also emphasised the implications for the safety and welfare of all British Jews, and our belief that this motion would make the Green Party the first electorally significant UK political party in living memory to adopt what appears to be an overtly antisemitic political platform,” they said.
framing: assertive · carried by 3 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-04
🔮 It declares the Greens to be an “anti-Zionist party” and sets into its policy that Zionism, the movement to develop and protect a Jewish state in Israel, will be “treated as any other form of racism”. It also supports the establishment of a “single democratic Palestinian State in all of historic Palestine with Jerusalem as its capital”.
2026-10-04 · Evening Standard
Greens make ‘Zionism is racism’ party policy as Polanski skips vote · assertive framing
2026-10-04 · Evening Standard
Greens make ‘Zionism is racism’ party policy as Polanski skips vote · assertive framing
2026-10-04 · Evening Standard
Zack Polanski barred from Israel after ‘Zionism is racism’ made party policy · assertive framing

Claims (40 extracted, 1 hedged)

Mr Polanski did not take part in the vote on the motion, having left the party conference after his speech on Friday to campaign in the Holborn and St Pancras by-election. asserted
Polanski → take → election
Israel accused the Green Party of legitimising “the destruction of the State of Israel” with a “clear antisemitic text”. asserted
Israel → accuse → text
In an update on Sunday evening, Israel’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs said the Greens’ resolution “constitutes a clear antisemitic text according to the IHRA definition, as it denies the Jewish people’s right to self-determination”. uncertain
it → say → determination
“Therefore, as a first step, foreign minister Gideon Sa’ar has decided this evening to declare Green Party leader Zack Polanski barred from entering Israel,” a statement said. asserted
statement → decide → Israel
“Today, the Green Party in Britain adopted a resolution equating Zionism with racism, legitimising armed struggle against Israel, and calling for the establishment of a Palestinian state “from the river to the sea” – meaning the destruction of the State of Israel,” it added. asserted
it → adopt → Israel
In a statement with Green MPs and his deputies, Mr Polanski said there is “no conflict between supporting the rights of Palestinians and the rights of Jewish people”. asserted
Polanski → say → people
Members in Brighton backed the motion with 1,022 votes in favour and 813 against. asserted
Members → back → favour
It declares the Greens to be an “anti-Zionist party” and sets into its policy that Zionism, the movement to develop and protect a Jewish state in Israel, will be “treated as any other form of racism”. It also supports the establishment of a “single democratic Palestinian State in all of historic Palestine with Jerusalem as its capital”. asserted
Jerusalem → declare → capital
Supporters chanted “say it loud, say it clear, Zionists are not welcome here” as the campaigners behind the motion, Greens for Palestine, gathered to speak to the media. asserted
campaigners → chant → media
Asked if the new stance meant Zionists would be kicked out of the party, former councillor Salma Yaqoob said “absolutely not”. asserted
Yaqoob → ask → party
This type of motion does not have a “material impact on governance or disciplinary procedures”, a Green Party spokesperson said. asserted
spokesperson → have → governance
Read More “This has been a serious and deeply felt debate within our membership. asserted
This → read → membership
Our members value the ability to bring forward and decide party policy, and conference has now made its decision. asserted
conference → value → decision
“The Green Party is an anti-racist party and has consistently opposed the illegal occupation of both Palestinian and Syrian land, called for an end to arms sales to the Israeli government and spoken out fearlessly about the devastating situation in Gaza and the West Bank. asserted
Party → oppose → Gaza
“Those positions remain central to our approach. asserted
positions → remain → approach
So too does our deeply-held commitment to equality, justice and human rights for all, and opposition to racism in all its forms. asserted
commitment → do → forms
The members voted against adding a clause to make clear the motion should not be used to “pressure, proscribe or discipline” party members for their affiliation to synagogues or other Jewish groups that describe themselves as Zionist. asserted
that → vote → Zionist
The Board of Deputies of British Jews said the Greens have become “an extremist party”. asserted
Greens → say → Jews
“The motion passed by the Green Party today is an attack on the Jewish community,” a statement said. asserted
statement → pass → community
Jewish leaders said the failure of the Green Party leadership to oppose the move “shows a staggering indifference to the welfare of British Jews”. asserted
failure → say → Jews
The chief executives of the Board of Deputies, Community Security Trust and Jewish Leadership Council wrote a letter to Green Party leaders ahead of the conference airing their concerns and referring back to a warning they issued over the motion earlier this year. “We also emphasised the implications for the safety and welfare of all British Jews, and our belief that this motion would make the Green Party the first electorally significant UK political party in living memory to adopt what appears to be an overtly antisemitic political platform,” they said. asserted
they → write → memory
Two senior Rabbis said the motion was “antisemitic in its formulation and intention”. asserted
motion → say → formulation
Rabbi Charley Baginsky and Rabbi Josh Levy said: “By adopting it, the Green Party has made antisemitism party policy and become a racist party.” asserted
Party → say → it
The vote has exposed divisions within the party as four of its five MPs – Ellie Chowns, Sian Berry and ex-leaders Adrian Ramsay and Carla Denyer – came out to publicly reject the motion. asserted
four → expose → motion
Ms Chowns said in a social media post that she was concerned the motion “risks fuelling division and risks undermining the party’s ability to advocate effectively for justice and peace”. asserted
motion → say → justice
Afterwards, party leader Mr Polanski and the five MPs released a joint statement saying they would “always uphold universal human rights”. asserted
they → release → rights
“We will never tolerate any form of discrimination or harassment. asserted
We → tolerate → discrimination
“We will continue to stand in opposition to genocide, ethnic cleansing, apartheid and the illegal occupation. asserted
We → continue → genocide
“We will continue to call out the heinous crimes of the Netanyahu government. asserted
We → continue → government
“And we will continue to work to ensure that the Green Party is an anti-racist party in every way. asserted
Party → continue → way
“We know there is no conflict between supporting the rights of Palestinians and the rights of Jewish people.” asserted
We → know → people
The position will become party policy but the Greens do not require all their politicians to back it. asserted
Greens → become → it
Party leader Mr Polanski is running to become an MP in Sir Keir Starmer’s former seat and the Greens had encouraged members to leave Brighton to support his campaign in London. asserted
Greens → run → London
Mr Polanski said he believes that the “displacement and genocide of the Palestinian people” is “clearly racism” in an interview with the BBC earlier this week. asserted
displacement → say → BBC
But he said he wanted an amendment to call for one Palestinian state in the motion, “because what I want to see is equal rights for Israelis and Palestinians”. asserted
want → say → Israelis
Chair of the Labour Party Bridget Phillipson described the decision as “fundamentally wrong”. asserted
Phillipson → describe → decision
She said: “It is shameful to vote against a two-state solution for Israel and Palestine and to condemn the vast majority of British Jews and Jews around the world as racist for supporting Israel’s right to exist. “ asserted
It → say → right
It is fundamentally wrong and the leadership of the Green Party must make clear that this will not be their position moving forwards.” asserted
be → make → Party
The Conservatives said it showed the Green Party is “toxic to its core”. asserted
Party → say → core
Shadow home secretary Chris Philp said: “British Jews should not have to disclaim a belief in Jewish self-determination and the existence of Israel in order to be accepted by a British political party.” asserted
Jews → say → party
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support