The Aporia
The Korea Times. (2026, October 5). If BTS has to serve, why are South Korean sportsmen, artists exempt: ex-lawmaker. South China Morning Post. https://www.scmp.com/news/asia/east-asia/article/3369761/if-bts-has-serve-why-are-south-korean-sportsmen-artists-exempt-ex-lawmaker?utm_source=rss_feed
The Korea Times. “If BTS has to serve, why are South Korean sportsmen, artists exempt: ex-lawmaker.” South China Morning Post, 5 Oct. 2026, https://www.scmp.com/news/asia/east-asia/article/3369761/if-bts-has-serve-why-are-south-korean-sportsmen-artists-exempt-ex-lawmaker?utm_source=rss_feed.
The Korea Times. “If BTS has to serve, why are South Korean sportsmen, artists exempt: ex-lawmaker.” South China Morning Post, October 5, 2026. https://www.scmp.com/news/asia/east-asia/article/3369761/if-bts-has-serve-why-are-south-korean-sportsmen-artists-exempt-ex-lawmaker?utm_source=rss_feed.
Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.
In September, South Korea's football team won its fourth consecutive Asian Games gold medal by defeating Japan in Toyota near Nagoya. The team’s captain, Lee Gi-hyuk, celebrated his exemption from mandatory military service. This sparked criticism and comments from former lawmaker Yoo Seong-min questioning why athletes are exempt when other young men, including the K-pop group BTS, have to serve between 18 months and two years in the military. The controversy highlights the disparity in South Korea's conscription policy and the special treatment given to top sportsmen and artists.