The "Application for an Extension and the Querulous Opposition Continue the Path of Bikeshedding or … Parkinson's Law of Triviality"

Read the original at Reason ↗
Cite

Volokh, E. (2026, October 6). The "Application for an Extension and the Querulous Opposition Continue the Path of Bikeshedding or … Parkinson's Law of Triviality". Reason. https://reason.com/volokh/2026/10/06/the-application-for-an-extension-and-the-querulous-opposition-continue-the-path-of-bikeshedding-or-parkinsons-law-of-triviality/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Reason · collected 2026-10-06 · by Eugene Volokh

Quick Summary

No summary of this article yet; the story summary below covers the event.

AI analysis

Story summary

In a recent order from Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks in the Eastern District of New York (E.D.N.Y.), dated last month in the case *Lask v. Sorid*, the judge granted plaintiff's motion for an extension to file a reply but criticized both parties for engaging in unnecessary delays and trivial arguments, labeling their actions as "bikeshedding" or adhering to Parkinson's Law of Triviality. The ruling extends the deadline for the plaintiff’s reply until September 21, 2026, and explicitly states that no further extensions will be granted. This decision highlights ongoing issues with procedural delays in legal proceedings, emphasizing the need for efficiency and substantive engagement rather than prolonged trivial disputes.

Written for “Parkinson's Law Debate” on 2026-11-03, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Parkinson's Law Debate
Other · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
3
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
0%
0 of 3 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
67/100
Reason's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Other
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-06 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Reason · 1087 article(s) · 4 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 4 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Eugene Volokh
192 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 In May 2025, Harvard revoked Plaintiff's tenure and terminated her appointment with HBS.
🔮 The requirement would hold DSPs liable for their failure to adhere to state-set publication standards, not only "treat[ing] [them] as … publisher[s] or speaker[s]," but treating them as publishers subject to sweeping state controls.
🔮 From Sanchez v. Almond, decided Wednesday by Judge John McConnell (D.R.I.): Mr. Sanchez began working at the office of Rhode Island Governor Daniel J. McKee in May 2021 as a "constituent services" staffer.
🔮 Beauchamp believed that the post appeared to condone murder based on the victim's political viewpoints and statements and became concerned that this post and perception would reflect on GCAO in the public's eyes and thereby undermine the public's trust in GCAO's official duty to prosecute homicides without bias and without regard to a victim's views, statements, or affiliations.
2026-11-02 · assertive framing · Firing for "Rot in Hell Charlie Kirk" Post Upheld
🔮 After Judge Covington announced that she would be denying McClain's suppression motion, Outlaw stood up and said "the judge is a cocksucker" loud enough for Judge Covington to hear.
🔮 According to the Complaint, in August 2024, Plaintiffs and other District community members learned that then-member of the Board of School Directors of Souderton Area School District (the "Board") William Formica posted lewd comments on social media about Vice President Kamala Harris, disparaging teachers and non-English speakers, and deriding diversity programs.
🔮 Some excerpts from the long First Superseding Indictment in U.S. v. Hakim (E.D. Mich.), filed Oct. 21, alleging conspiracy to transmit threats in interstate commerce as well as, for two defendants, witness intimidation and destruction of property to prevent seizure (8 of the 12 defendants had originally been indicted in May); the targets included UM officials and businesses connected with them, as well as the Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Detroit:
🔮 Because "[t]he costs and efforts required to defend a lawsuit through [discovery] could chill free speech nearly as effectively as the absence of the actual malice standard altogether[,]" a public figure plaintiff must plausibly allege actual malice at the outset of the litigation.
🔮 The First Amendment forbids a State from using its investigative power that way, and I will not allow it while this case is pending.
🔮 The same logic could apply to nuns who had felt religious pressure to do the educational or nursing work that their order was known for, or to monks who had felt religious pressure to do agricultural work that supports the monastery.
2026-10-30 · assertive framing · Amicus Brief in OneTaste Criminal Prosecution
Also by Eugene Volokh
Open Thread
2026-11-03 · Reason
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 192 articles by Eugene Volokh →

Topics

E.D.N.Y. ECF No.

Subjects

E.D.N.Y. GPE · 1× James M. Wicks PERSON · 1× Lask PERSON · 1× Sorid PERSON · 1×

Narrative

Plaintiff's application for an extension and the querulous opposition (ECF No. 92) continue the path of bikeshedding or the application of Parkinson's Law of Triviality.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-06
🔮 No further extensions will be granted.

Claims (3 extracted, 0 hedged)

Plaintiff's application for an extension and the querulous opposition (ECF No. 92) continue the path of bikeshedding or the application of Parkinson's Law of Triviality. asserted
application → continue → Triviality
Plaintiff's Reply shall now be filed on or before 9/21/2026. asserted
Reply → file → 9/21/2026
No further extensions will be granted. asserted
extensions → grant → ?
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support