Lawyers for a former Olympian whom the Justice Department charged with intentionally damaging the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool, only to abruptly drop the case after determining he was not responsible, urged two government watchdogs on Tuesday to examine what they say was a flawed investigation and prosecution.
asserted
they → charge → Tuesday
The attorneys for David Hearn said in a letter to the inspectors general for the departments of Justice and Interior that “incompetence and misconduct” were committed by government officials operating under pressure from President Donald Trump, and that watchdog investigations were needed “to determine what happened inside their agencies that led to the shocking and indefensible treatment” of their client.
asserted
that → say → client
The letter was filed days after a District of Columbia judge permanently dismissed the case, ending a brief prosecution derided by defense lawyers and other critics as an abuse of government power pushed by a president who insisted vandalism, not human error, was to blame for damage at the landmark.
asserted
vandalism → file → landmark
The request indicates that Hearn’s lawyers see an additional need for accountability even after the dismissal of the legal proceedings.
asserted
lawyers → indicate → proceedings
“In light of these findings and the government’s own admissions, a critical purpose of the requested investigations is to collect the facts — through witness interviews and the collection and analysis of electronic media and documents — necessary to hold accountable the individuals and groups who failed Mr. Hearn, the criminal justice system, and the public,” the lawyers wrote.
asserted
lawyers → request → Hearn
“These events,” they said, “demand accountability and full and unconstrained investigations by your offices.”
asserted
they → say → offices
The Justice Department inspector general’s office declined to comment on whether it would act on the lawyers’ request.
asserted
it → decline → request
A phone message seeking comment with the Interior Department’s inspector general’s office was not immediately returned.
asserted
message → seek → office
Defense lawyers say prosecutors ignored exculpatory evidence
D.C. Superior Court Judge Todd Edelman on Thursday dismissed the case against Hearn with “prejudice,” which would block U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro’s office from refiling the felony charge against him.
asserted
which → say → him
He said the decision was warranted by the case’s “exceptional circumstances” and agreed with defense attorneys that the government “shot first and asked questions later” by charging Hearn in a “lightning-fast indictment process.”
asserted
government → say → process
Pirro moved to dismiss the case in July weeks after it was brought, saying newly produced evidence from the Interior Department showed Hearn was not responsible for damage to the pool’s lining.
asserted
Hearn → move → lining
She attributed the damage instead to a botched installation by a contractor as well as a rush to complete the project in time for this summer’s America 250 celebration in Washington.
asserted
She → attribute → Washington
But Hearn’s lawyers say in their letter that the evidence that established their client’s innocence had been in the Justice Department’s possession for weeks and was “simply ignored.”
asserted
that → say → weeks
They asked the department’s inspector general to investigate why prosecutors “rushed to indict” under what they said was political pressure from Trump, who had launched a massive renovation project before the anniversary celebrations and later accused Pirro of having “choked” and “folded like an umbrella” when she dismissed the case.
asserted
she → ask → case
The attorneys also called on the watchdog to investigate, among other things, whether prosecutors failed to disclose exculpatory information in their possession and prosecutors relied on a grand jury witness who presented an unsupported figure on monetary damages to the pool; whether comments Pirro made at the indictment press conference violated Justice Department policy; and whether Pirro also violated policy by approaching and questioning a defense expert.
asserted
Pirro → call → expert
“The record reflects an indictment obtained through unusual haste and a prosecution shaped from the outset by political pressure and built on an inadequate investigation,” they said, adding, “The sprint to charge Mr. Hearn mirrored the rushed renovation itself, which the President had publicly committed to completing by a fixed deadline.”
asserted
President → reflect → deadline
Pirro’s office did not return an email seeking comment.
asserted
office → return → comment
Questions are also raised about the Interior Department
Hearn, 67, of Bethesda, Maryland, competed in three Summer Olympics, earning his best finish, ninth, at the 1996 Atlanta Olympic Games, the U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Committee says on its website.
asserted
Committee → raise → website
He has said he was on a bike ride on June 19 when he reached in to examine the pool’s newly peeled coating and briefly touched a chunk attached to the side of the pool.
asserted
he → say → pool
But he said he obeyed a park worker’s command to let go of it.
asserted
he → say → it
He was nonetheless stopped by police officers, arrested and detained for nearly five hours.
asserted
He → stop → hours
He was indicted on one count of property destruction, a charge carrying a maximum 10-year prison sentence.
asserted
He → indict → sentence
His lawyers questioned whether prosecutors properly presented the grand jury with adequate evidence to support the charge and the amount of damage alleged by the government.
asserted
prosecutors → question → government
They say prosecutors failed to “critically examine” allegations of a supposedly key witness whose claims about her interactions with Hearn were contradicted by video evidence, and withheld from the defense team body-worn camera recordings and other evidence.
uncertain
claims → say → recordings
And they also challenge Pirro herself over her actions, saying she approached a defense expert at the pool on July 17 and asked about his conclusions and the results of his work.
asserted
she → challenge → work
No report of that interaction has been produced to defense lawyers, they say.
asserted
they → produce → lawyers
“A U.S. Attorney who personally interrogates a represented defendant’s testifying expert, in the field, surrounded by her own staff and without notice to counsel, is not gathering evidence — she is testing how the defense intends to prove its case, and doing so in a setting that essentially held the expert captive,” the letter states.
asserted
letter → interrogate → setting
The letter also urges the Interior Department’s inspector general to investigate questions including who made the decision “to proceed with an unqualified contractor;” why work on the pool proceeded despite known risks; why the department relied on National Guardsmen to detain Hearn; and why officials made “publicly defamatory” statements even after learning of the dismissal of the case.
asserted
officials → urge → case
Asked for comment, the Interior Department said that “Mr. Hearn admitted to officers that he was tampering with the Reflecting Pool.”
asserted
he → ask → Pool
His lawyers said in response that Hearn “has never used the word ‘tampering.’
asserted
Hearn → say → word
He touched the loose liner in the Reflecting Pool.
asserted
He → touch → Pool
The Aporia
