James Carville warns Dems against impeaching Trump if they win 2026 midterms
By
asserted
they → warn → midterms
Veteran Democratic strategist James Carville urged Democrats to avoid pursuing a third impeachment of President Donald Trump if the party wins control of the House of Representatives in November, arguing it would be “highly unlikely” to succeed.
asserted
it → urge → November
On the “Politics War Room” podcast on Thursday, Carville and his co-host Al Hunt argued that impeachment would be a waste of time and Democrats should devote their energy to investigating the president instead.
asserted
Democrats → argue → president
“I’ll tell you one thing that I think Democrats should steer clear of, and that’s impeachment,” Hunt said.
asserted
Hunt → tell → that
“It’s not that Trump has not committed impeachable offenses, far worse than what he was accused of back in 2019 with Ukraine.
asserted
he → ’ → Ukraine
I mean, he has.
asserted
he → mean → ?
I mean, you could come up with a bill of particulars of, you know, a dozen at least.
uncertain
you → mean → dozen
But you know something, James?
asserted
you → know → something
It’s not going to happen, and it is a distraction.”
asserted
it → go → ?
“It is a waste of energy,” Hunt, like other Democrats, warned further.
asserted
Hunt → warn → Democrats
Don’t go on a mission that isn’t going to succeed.”
asserted
that → go → mission
Carville agreed, arguing that the Supreme Court is protecting Trump from the consequences of his actions.
“
asserted
Court → agree → actions
So, you investigate, and, of course, what you’re going to find — and you’re going to find it quickly — is overwhelming evidence of criminal activity.
asserted
you → investigate → activity
Now, of course, he can’t commit a crime according to the Supreme Court because, well, he’s above the law,” Carville lamented.
uncertain
Carville → commit → law
“But suppose you say, ‘This is incontrovertible proof.
asserted
This → suppose → ?
We got to do something about this.
asserted
We → got → this
How can he stay in office?’
asserted
he → stay → office
And impeachment would be a very difficult thing,” Carville warned.
asserted
Carville → warn → ?
“It’s time-consuming.
asserted
It → ’ → ?
It’s highly unlikely to be anything because of the — you need so many votes in the Senate.
asserted
you → ’ → Senate
But we’re going to find out a whole bunch of stuff really fast at the beginning of the year 2027.
asserted
we → go → year
I promise you.”
asserted
I → promise → you
“Well, I agree.
asserted
I → agree → ?
I might quibble with ‘very fast’ because I think investigations got to be thorough.
uncertain
investigations → quibble → ?
They got to be really — some of them are actually going to take a while,” Hunt replied.
asserted
Hunt → got → while
“They’re going to build a case, but we’re going to find them out.
asserted
we → go → them
You’re absolutely right about that.
asserted
You → ’re → that
And I am only against impeachment because I think it’s not going to succeed and will be a distraction.”
asserted
it → think → impeachment
Fox News Digital spoke to former Democratic advisor Dan Turrentine, who suggested Carville and Hunt are spot-on.
uncertain
Carville → speak → Turrentine
To paraphrase James, it’s a simple math issue, stupid.
asserted
it → paraphrase → James
Unless something truly unimaginable [happens], there will not be 67 votes in the Senate to convict.
asserted
something → happen → Senate
And the public is not there, either,” Turrentine said.
asserted
Turrentine → say → ?
Start your day with all you need to know
Morning Report delivers the latest news, videos, photos and more.
asserted
Report → start → news
“If we win the majority, the voters that delivered it are clear, they want us laser focused on their lives, the issues they care about.
asserted
they → win → lives
We should conduct appropriate oversight and let history and 2028 be the accountability.
asserted
history → conduct → oversight
“
The White House did not immediately return Fox News Digital’s request for comment.
asserted
House → return → comment