Photo via The Independent

‘Judgment day’? Why Trump’s death penalty crusade is bringing back firing squads

Read the original at The Independent ↗
Cite

Woodward, A. (2026, October 7). ‘Judgment day’? Why Trump’s death penalty crusade is bringing back firing squads. The Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-death-penalty-firing-squad-execution-b3062401.html

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

The Independent · collected 2026-10-07 · by Alex Woodward

Quick Summary

Donald Trump approved the execution of Nidal Hasan using a firing squad, marking the first military execution by this method since 1945 when Private Eddie Slovik was executed for desertion during World War II. Trump's move is part of his broader effort to revive federal executions and explore alternative methods like nitrogen gas and electrocution, which could expedite death sentences. Critics argue that Trump’s approach contradicts the trend towards more humane execution methods used in recent decades.
Written by AI on 2026-10-07, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Donald Trump approved the execution of Nidal Hasan using a firing squad, marking the first military execution by this method since Private Eddie Slovik's in 1945. This decision reflects Trump's broader push to reinstate and expedite federal executions through methods like nitrogen gas and electrocution. The last military execution for desertion was carried out on January 31, 1945, when Slovik faced a firing squad of 12 soldiers, who shot him with M1 Garands from 20 paces away. Activists argue that Trump's actions highlight his enthusiasm for wielding the power to impose capital punishment.

Written for “Trump Death Penalty Crusade” on 2026-11-01, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Trump Death Penalty Crusade
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 20% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
New York Post
Hedges 0 of 3 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A discusses President Trump's approval of firing squad execution for Nidal Hasan, while Article B provides historical context about Army Private Eddie Slovik's execution and does not describe the same specific event.”
Fox News
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 0 of 5 claims Outlet record 69/100
“Article A discusses Trump's decision to allow Nidal Malik Hasan to face a firing squad, while Article B mentions Eddie Slovik's historical military execution and does not refer to the same specific event as Article A.”
The Guardian
Hedges 0 of 17 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A discusses Trump's approval of Hasan's execution, while Article B references historical executions including Slovik's in 1945.”
BBC News
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 1 of 17 claims Outlet record 68/100
“The articles describe different historical executions: one about Nidal Malik Hasan's upcoming execution, and another referencing the execution of Eddie Slovik during World War Two.”
Toronto Star
⚖️ Centre Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 64/100
“Article A discusses President Trump's approval of firing squad execution for Nidal Hasan, while Article B references historical executions and does not describe a specific current event related to Hasan.”
Al Jazeera
Hedges 1 of 14 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles describe different historical executions; Article A discusses Nidal Hasan's impending firing squad execution, while Article B references Eddie Slovik's past execution during World War II.”
NPR
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 8 of 58 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles describe different executions: one involving Eddie Slovik during WWII and another involving Nidal Hasan approved by President Trump.”
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 4 of 29 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A describes the historical execution of Eddie Slovik in 1945, while Article B discusses Pete Hegseth's announcement about a future public firing squad execution.”
CBS News
Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A discusses the historical execution of Eddie Slovik during World War II, while Article B focuses on a planned future public execution for Nidal Hasan.”
The Independent
Hedges 9 of 30 claims Outlet record 59/100
“The articles discuss different executions: one about Eddie Slovik's historical military execution and another about a potential future livestreamed execution of Nidal Malik Hasan.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
40
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
20%
8 of 40 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
59/100
The Independent's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-07 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Independent · 3473 article(s) · 8 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 8 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Alex Woodward
53 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The letter — allegedly signed by Trump and featuring a sexually suggestive drawing and a birthday wish that says “may every day be another wonderful secret” — was first published by the newspaper and then shared with members of Congress by the Epstein estate last year.
🔮 Friday night’s order arrived hours after a federal appeals court in the state blocked the administration’s efforts to sequester 20,000 ballots, which another judge warned would “wreak havoc” on elections in the state.
🔮 A federal appeals court has rejected the Trump administration’s latest attempt to stop counting 20,000 ballots in California, an effort that a panel of appeals court judges said could “jeopardize” midterm elections and disenfranchise thousands of eligible voters.
🔮 Donald Trump’s administration is imminently expected to forcibly remove dozens of Afghans from the U.S. to Afghanistan, marking the first large-scale deportation flight of Afghans back into the hands of the Taliban, aid groups and human rights lawyers warn.
🔮 U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes repeatedly erupted at government attorneys during a heated court hearing on Friday before finding that Justice Department officials “intentionally” timed the abrupt removal of hundreds of trees to evade judicial review — and may have been misleading the court about plans that have long been in the works. “The third highest ranking official at the Department of Justice is telling me, telling a federal court, that he cannot say that when the president posted the ‘course will close on November 15,’ what he meant was, ‘the court will close on November 15’?” Reyes asked.
🔮 The president will instead participate in a series of virtual rallies.
🔮 “It will be utilized as a dual-purpose structure: a major national monument that also incorporates military utility to support Homeland defense.”
🔮 Augustin, who is homeless, later said he wanted to get the attention of law enforcement so he could be arrested and sent back to Haiti.
🔮 After the administration was ordered in a separate case to stop running the ads, the president said he would finance the broadcasts himself, or direct his connected PAC to do so.
🔮 Those fines also don’t include $661 million in restitution owed by the former tech CEO who was convicted of defrauding investors, nor the potentially tens of thousands of dollars that would have likely been owed to the government by the more than 1,500 people charged in connection with the January 6 attack.
Also by Alex Woodward
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 53 articles by Alex Woodward →

Topics

Army Death Penalty Action Independent M1 Garands U.S.

Subjects

Trump PERSON · 5× Slovik PERSON · 2× Army ORG · 1× Donald Trump’s PERSON · 1× Eddie Slovik PERSON · 1× Hasan PERSON · 1× Independent ORG · 1× Nick Gozik PERSON · 1× Nidal Hasan PERSON · 1× U.S. GPE · 1×

Narrative

Donald Trump’s approval of the execution of Nidal Hasan will mark the military’s first execution by firing squad since Slovik’s killing in 1945, part of a renewed push by the president to restart federal executions — and turn to methods such as firing squads as well as nitrogen gas and electrocution to carry out sentences quicker.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-07
🔮 Donald Trump’s approval of the execution of Nidal Hasan will mark the military’s first execution by firing squad since Slovik’s killing in 1945, part of a renewed push by the president to restart federal executions — and turn to methods such as firing squads as well as nitrogen gas and electrocution to carry out sentences quicker.

Claims (40 extracted, 8 hedged)

When Army Private Eddie Slovik faced a firing squad of 12 members from his own unit on Jan. 31, 1945, the riflemen aimed their M1 Garands at his heart from 20 paces away and fired on command. asserted
riflemen → face → command
Four shots were fatal, but he wasn’t immediately killed. asserted
he → kill → ?
Before the riflemen finished reloading, Slovik, 24, was dead. asserted
Slovik → finish → ?
Witness Nick Gozik later said the first and only U.S. military execution for desertion since 1864 was “traumatic” and “very unnerving.” asserted
execution → say → 1864
Donald Trump’s approval of the execution of Nidal Hasan will mark the military’s first execution by firing squad since Slovik’s killing in 1945, part of a renewed push by the president to restart federal executions — and turn to methods such as firing squads as well as nitrogen gas and electrocution to carry out sentences quicker. asserted
approval → mark → sentences
“Judgment day for Hasan has finally come,” Trump wrote on X. “There is nothing Donald Trump loves more than the power to kill,” Death Penalty Action, a nonprofit group advocating for abolishing the death penalty, responded in a statement. asserted
Action → come → statement
Public opinion polls have suggested that support for the death penalty has plummeted in recent decades, but Trump has pursued federal executions with unprecedented frequency. uncertain
Trump → suggest → frequency
During his first term, the federal government executed 13 people, the most under any president in more than 120 years, and a streak that resumed after a 17-year hiatus. asserted
that → execute → hiatus
Before he left office, Joe Biden commuted the sentences of 37 people awaiting executions on federal death row, leaving death sentences in place for only three men. asserted
Biden → leave → men
Attorney General Todd Blanche said the previous administration “failed in its duty to protect the American people” and took “extraordinary steps to weaken, delay, and dismantle the death penalty.” asserted
administration → say → penalty
Hours after returning to the White House last year, Trump signed an executive order directing the attorney general to seek the death penalty in future cases “for all crimes of a severity demanding its use.” asserted
Trump → return → use
Earlier this year, the Justice Department unveiled a plan to “strengthen the death penalty” by directing the Bureau of Prisons to use pentobarbital for lethal injections and consider other execution methods — including firing squads and even electrocution — to expedite death sentences. asserted
methods → unveil → sentences
Trump also instructed the attorney general to “take all necessary and lawful action” to help states obtain lethal injection drugs to carry out more executions. asserted
states → instruct → executions
Bloody, public spectacles of deaths by firing squad began to disappear over the last century ago as states and the federal government moved towards what they considered more “humane” ways of killing people being closed doors through the expanded use of lethal gas, electrocution and drugs. asserted
they → begin → gas
But, under pressure from anti-death penalty activists, pharmaceutical companies have refused to sell those drugs to states, diminishing their supplies and forcing them to turn to other killing methods to carry out executions for death row inmates. asserted
companies → refuse → inmates
Those methods have also included untested drug “cocktails” that have led to a wave of horrific botched executions. asserted
that → include → executions
Some states have relied on compounding pharmacies, which make customized, non-FDA-approved versions of prescription drugs that are not subject to the same safety and efficacy reviews. asserted
that → rely → reviews
The Trump administration’s latest announcement followed the attempted execution of Christa Pike, who was scheduled to be executed by lethal injection with a single barbiturate — Tennessee’s first attempt to execute a woman in more than 200 years. asserted
who → follow → years
But the execution failed. asserted
execution → fail → ?
She survived two injections and was hospitalized and on a ventilator. asserted
She → survive → ventilator
On Tuesday, her attorneys said she is now “conscious, speaking, and continues to receive critical medical care.” asserted
she → say → care
Pike’s lawyers had previously asked state officials to consider an alternative to lethal injection, such as death by hanging or firing squad, after the state botched a different execution earlier this year. asserted
state → ask → execution
Two dozen states do not carry out capital punishment, according to the Death Penalty Information Center. uncertain
states → carry → Center
Deterrence is “one of the most commonly expressed reasons” for using the death penalty — but despite Trump’s claims, evidence shows that “states that impose the death penalty are not safer than states that do not use the death penalty,” according to the center. uncertain
that → express → center
At least five states allow firing squads as a method of execution. asserted
states → allow → execution
Last year, South Carolina carried out three killings by firing squad — the first in the state in 15 years. asserted
Carolina → carry → years
In April 2025, a three-person firing squad in South Carolina shot Mikal Mahdi, who cried out as the bullets struck him. asserted
bullets → shoot → him
He groaned twice before taking one final breath. asserted
He → groan → breath
An autopsy report later revealed two wounds on his chest, and none of the bullets directly hit his heart, which is where the gunmen are supposed to aim. asserted
gunmen → reveal → heart
Mahdi, 42, endured “excruciating conscious pain and suffering” for up to one minute and suffered a prolonged death, according to his attorneys. uncertain
Mahdi → endure → attorneys
Hasan killed 13 people and injured 32 others when he opened fire at Fort Hood’s Soldier Readiness Processing Center in 2009. asserted
he → kill → 2009
He reportedly shouted out “Allahu akbar” — meaning “God is great” — before firing his handgun. uncertain
God → shout → handgun
Acting as his own attorney, Hasan was convicted by a military jury on 45 counts of murder and sentenced to death in 2013. asserted
Hasan → act → 2013
Hasan, who was scheduled to be deployed to Afghanistan at the end of 2009, admitted responsibility for the shooting and said he believed was on the wrong side of a war against Islam. asserted
he → schedule → Islam
He was left partially paralyzed after he was shot by police during his arrest. asserted
he → leave → arrest
Under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, a death sentence imposed by court-martial may not be carried out “until approved by the president.” uncertain
sentence → impose → president
Trump gave that approval on Monday, according to chief Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell. uncertain
Trump → give → Parnell
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth shared Trump’s ‘judgment day’ post, adding: “Justice.” Still, Trump’s announcement “does not mean his execution is imminent,” Robin M. Maher, executive director of the Death Penalty Information Center, told The Independent. asserted
Maher → share → Independent
“Mr. Hasan may still pursue his habeas appeals and that would delay any execution date,” she said. uncertain
she → pursue → date
“The Secretary of the Army will ultimately set the date, place and manner of execution.” asserted
Secretary → set → execution
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support