Photo via TIME

Why We Must Invest in Scientists, Not Just Science

Read the original at TIME ↗
Cite

Dirks, N. B. (2026, October 9). Why We Must Invest in Scientists, Not Just Science. TIME. https://time.com/article/2026/10/10/why-we-must-invest-in-scientists-not-just-science/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

TIME · collected 2026-10-09 · by Nicholas B. Dirks

Quick Summary

The article argues for the importance of investing in scientists themselves rather than just specific scientific projects. It highlights how major breakthroughs often arise unexpectedly from undirected research and stresses that early-career scientists need more support to reach their full potential. The author emphasizes the role of unrestricted funding, which allows scientists flexibility to pursue innovative but uncertain lines of inquiry without predefined outcomes.
Written by AI on 2026-10-09, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Nicholas B. Dirks argues in TIME that the approach to funding scientific research needs to change. He emphasizes that groundbreaking discoveries often stem from imaginative and serendipitous explorations rather than predefined objectives. For example, graphene, a material now used in various applications like medical equipment and electronics, was discovered through tangential research at the University of Manchester.

Dirks contends that scientific progress is inherently uncertain and unpredictable. Research frequently generates new questions rather than definitive answers, making it crucial to support scientists who can navigate this uncertainty with curiosity and dedication. He criticizes current funding mechanisms that demand clear deliverables and concise justifications in grant applications, arguing they stifle the kind of exploratory research that leads to major breakthroughs.

Written for “Investing In Scientists” on 2026-11-03, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Investing In Scientists
Science · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
34
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
6%
2 of 34 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
59/100
TIME's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Science
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-09 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

TIME · 793 article(s) · 2 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 2 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Nicholas B. Dirks
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Public bodies and universities must decide which projects to back before they know where those ideas will lead.
2026-10-09 · assertive framing · Why We Must Invest in Scientists, Not Just Science
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

the University of Manchester

Subjects

the University of Manchester ORG · 1×

Narrative

The pressure on them is not simply to demonstrate scientific progress, but to produce the kind of science that can be articulated succinctly in a grant application, attached to a clear set of deliverables, and ultimately defended as a sensible investment.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-09
🔮 Public bodies and universities must decide which projects to back before they know where those ideas will lead.
2026-10-09 · TIME
Why We Must Invest in Scientists, Not Just Science · assertive framing

Claims (34 extracted, 2 hedged)

We often think of science as a search for answers to a specific issue: a solution to a known problem, or a cure for a particular disease. asserted
We → think → disease
That is why so many of the major scientific breakthroughs in human history have been born out of hunches, the product of imagination or serendipity, coupled with the brilliance and curiosity of a scientist to recognize the significance of a discovery. asserted
many → bear → discovery
For instance, graphene was born out of tangential research at the University of Manchester and is now used in everything from medical equipment and electronics to batteries and tennis racquets. asserted
graphene → bear → batteries
Scientific research invariably raises new questions. asserted
research → raise → questions
What begins as a narrow inquiry opens dozens of new avenues of investigation, each capable of taking the research in an entirely new direction. asserted
begins → begin → direction
The pursuit of science is, at its core, less a journey towards a destination than an evolving exercise in enlightened exploration. asserted
pursuit → evolve → exploration
It is through patient, painstaking work, driven by curiosity and pursued through personal dedication and sacrifice, that scientific advancement occurs. asserted
advancement → drive → dedication
Yet, too often, our tendency as a society is to celebrate the tangible breakthroughs and neglect the assiduous process that made them possible. asserted
them → celebrate → process
But by design, most are awarded decades after the breakthrough discovery being recognized was first made. asserted
discovery → award → design
Scientists, however, are typically most creative and productive early in their careers but fail to receive the financial support essential to reaching their full potential. asserted
Scientists → fail → potential
This quandary is replicated many times over within the wider world of institutional funding. asserted
quandary → replicate → funding
Public bodies and universities must decide which projects to back before they know where those ideas will lead. asserted
ideas → decide → projects
And with many talented scientists competing for finite resources, much promising research is lost. asserted
research → compete → resources
I would argue that this challenge, therefore, is felt most acutely by early-career scientists. asserted
challenge → argue → scientists
The pressure on them is not simply to demonstrate scientific progress, but to produce the kind of science that can be articulated succinctly in a grant application, attached to a clear set of deliverables, and ultimately defended as a sensible investment. asserted
that → demonstrate → investment
Something is lost if we focus too narrowly on supporting only what we can fully justify in advance. asserted
we → lose → advance
Not every research grant is funded, and difficult choices must be made in the best of funding environments. asserted
choices → fund → environments
But the nature of the funding matters too, and philanthropy must help broaden the level of support provided to young scientists. asserted
philanthropy → matter → scientists
This is where unrestricted funding plays an especially important role. asserted
funding → play → role
It recognizes and supports their talent, ideas, judgment, curiosity, and long-term potential. asserted
It → recognize → talent
The money provided can be used to buy new equipment, hire a new staff member, or simply pursue a new line of inquiry. asserted
money → provide → inquiry
It means having the space and time to evaluate an idea that might otherwise be too abstract for a regular grant application. uncertain
that → mean → application
Unrestricted funding also provides scientists with freedom in a broader sense: it can relieve anxiety over rent, allow for a much-needed family vacation, or simply reduce financial pressure and give great thinkers more time to think about their science. asserted
it → provide → science
This is the principle upon which the Blavatnik Awards for Young Scientists was founded. asserted
Awards → found → Scientists
Awardees receive grants ranging from $15,000 to $250,000, the largest such prizes awarded to early-career scientists. asserted
Awardees → receive → scientists
Crucially, there are no conditions attached; it is up to the awardees themselves to decide how and where the money can make the greatest difference for their science. asserted
money → be → science
Philanthropy alone can never be a substitute for institutional or government funding, but it can play a vital role in driving discovery and human progress. asserted
it → play → discovery
It helps to create the conditions for greater risk-taking, unexpected advances, and the encouragement and retention of exceptional scientific talent. asserted
It → help → talent
And we have seen what can happen when that freedom is provided. asserted
freedom → see → ?
These early-career scientists have created over 50 companies, with a combined value exceeding $40 billion. asserted
scientists → create → billion
Among these success stories are Amprius, which develops high-energy-density lithium-ion batteries; Editas Medicine, a gene-editing company; and Revolution Medicines, which develops new treatments for cancer. asserted
which → develop → cancer
So is a breakthrough that fundamentally changes how we understand the world or a finding that opens an entirely new field of discovery. asserted
that → change → discovery
It is the gift of freedom to explore, experiment, and persevere. asserted
It → explore → freedom
It provides the freedom to ask questions without knowing where the answers might lead, which is the very essence of science. uncertain
which → provide → science
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support