Photo via South China Morning Post

Anthropic claims Chinese AI firms secretly use Claude. Is it true?

Read the original at South China Morning Post ↗
Cite

Lee, C. M. (2026, October 9). Anthropic claims Chinese AI firms secretly use Claude. Is it true? South China Morning Post. https://www.scmp.com/tech/tech-war/article/3370317/anthropic-claims-chinese-ai-firms-secretly-use-claude-it-true?utm_source=rss_feed

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

South China Morning Post · collected 2026-10-09 · by Chong Ming Lee

Quick Summary

Anthropic has alleged that Chinese artificial intelligence companies are secretly using its model, Claude, to cut costs and close the technology gap with Western firms. The claims suggest that these Chinese developers have been extracting capabilities from US AI models through fraudulent accounts and proxy networks. Analysts warn that if true, the primary concern for Beijing would be data security rather than intellectual property theft or direct model copying.
Written by AI on 2026-10-09, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Anthropic has accused Chinese AI firms of using fraudulent accounts and proxy networks to illegally access and copy data from its key model, Claude, raising concerns about technology theft. The claims suggest that some Chinese companies might even be utilizing the US-based Claude as a hidden backend for their applications. This comes after warnings from US officials, including US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who noted large-scale "distillation" activities by Chinese firms aimed at reducing costs and accelerating their development pace. Analysts suggest that if these allegations are true, Beijing's primary concern would likely be data security rather than intellectual property theft or model copying.

Written for “Chinese AI Companies Using Claude” on 2026-11-01, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Chinese AI Companies Using Claude
Technology · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly right and hedges 50% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Straits Times
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 5 of 19 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the US-China AI competition without describing the same specific incident.”
South China Morning Post
Hedges 0 of 5 claims Outlet record 64/100
“Article A reports on Anthropic enabling Chinese-language options for its Claude chatbot, while Article B discusses claims that Chinese AI firms are secretly using Claude.”
South China Morning Post
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 2 of 13 claims Outlet record 64/100
“The articles discuss different topics related to AI but do not describe the same specific incident.”
ABC News (AU)
Hedges 7 of 48 claims Outlet record 68/100
“The articles describe different incidents involving Anthropic's AI, one about alleged secret use by Chinese firms and another about a false murder tip-off.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
6
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
50%
3 of 6 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
64/100
South China Morning Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Technology
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-09 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

South China Morning Post · 3509 article(s) · 6 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 6 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Chong Ming Lee
12 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Managing digital workers As businesses race to build AI workforces, supervising them is becoming the next big challenge When artificial intelligence agents first arrived, they came with a tantalising promise: autonomous “digital workers” that would finally free humans from corporate drudgery.
🔮 If the claims are true, Beijing’s main concern would not be intellectual property theft or model copying, but data security, says one analyst Did Chinese AI companies secretly tap US models to close the technology gap?
🔮 One Hong Kong-based user posted on the “r/claude” subreddit that they received an email from Anthropic’s safeguards team citing “suspicious signals” associated with their account, which would be revoked for usage policy violations.
🔮 The acquisition, expected to close by the end of this year, would integrate World Labs’ research team and spatial-intelligence model expertise into AMD, according to an announcement on Monday.
Also by Chong Ming Lee
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 12 articles by Chong Ming Lee →

Topics

Anthropic Beijing China Chinese Claude

Subjects

Chinese NORP · 5× Anthropic ORG · 3× American NORP · 1× Beijing GPE · 1× China GPE · 1× Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency ORG · 1× FBI ORG · 1× Treasury ORG · 1× Washington GPE · 1× the National Security Agency ORG · 1×

Narrative

Specifically, Anthropic claimed Chinese AI developers used fraudulent accounts and proxy networks to siphon reasoning data from its flagship model, Claude – and in some cases even used the US model as a covert back end for their own apps.
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-09
🔮 If the claims are true, Beijing’s main concern would not be intellectual property theft or model copying, but data security, says one analyst Did Chinese AI companies secretly tap US models to close the technology gap?
2026-10-09 · South China Morning Post
Anthropic claims Chinese AI firms secretly use Claude. Is it true? · mixed framing

Claims (6 extracted, 3 hedged)

Anthropic claims Chinese AI firms secretly use Claude. uncertain
firms → claim → Claude
If the claims are true, Beijing’s main concern would not be intellectual property theft or model copying, but data security, says one analyst Did Chinese AI companies secretly tap US models to close the technology gap? uncertain
companies → say → gap
That is the central question hanging over China’s tech sector following a wave of allegations from Washington and American AI lab Anthropic. asserted
That → hang → Washington
According to a joint advisory by the National Security Agency, FBI, and Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency last month, Chinese AI developers have been systematically extracting capabilities from US frontier models to reduce their own computing, electricity and research costs. uncertain
developers → accord → costs
US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent similarly warned in July that Chinese firms were engaged in large-scale “distillation”. asserted
firms → warn → distillation
Specifically, Anthropic claimed Chinese AI developers used fraudulent accounts and proxy networks to siphon reasoning data from its flagship model, Claude – and in some cases even used the US model as a covert back end for their own apps. asserted
developers → claim → apps
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support