Photo via Los Angeles Times

U.S. plan to live-stream execution by firing squad draws bipartisan, international outrage

Read the original at Los Angeles Times ↗
Cite

Rector, K., & Ceballos, A. (2026, October 9). U.S. plan to live-stream execution by firing squad draws bipartisan, international outrage. Los Angeles Times. https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2026-10-09/u-s-plan-to-live-stream-execution-by-firing-squad-draws-bipartisan-international-outrage

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Los Angeles Times · collected 2026-10-09 · by Kevin Rector, Ana Ceballos

Quick Summary

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced plans to live-stream the December 3 execution by firing squad of Nidal Malik Hasan, who killed 13 people at Fort Hood, Texas in 2009. This decision has faced widespread condemnation from both Republicans and Democrats, as well as human rights officials, religious leaders, and legal experts, who view it as a form of punishment typically associated with authoritarian regimes rather than democratic nations like the United States.
Written by AI on 2026-10-09, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

On October 16, 2026, U.S. President Donald Trump canceled plans to livestream the firing squad execution of Nidal Hasan, who was convicted and sentenced to death for killing 13 people in a mass shooting at Fort Hood military base in Texas in 2009. The decision came after widespread criticism from domestic and international stakeholders, including U.S. politicians and religious organizations. Trump stated that although the streaming could serve as a deterrent against terrorism, he acknowledged that many Americans would prefer not to witness such an event. The execution will still take place but will not be publicly broadcast. Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell confirmed the cancellation in a statement. This reversal marks a significant shift following initial plans announced by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth earlier in October. Interviews with Americans showed overwhelming support for Trump's decision, citing concerns about making a spectacle out of an execution and likening public broadcasting to practices seen in countries like North Korea. The actual date and location of the execution have not been disclosed but must occur within 150 days of the president's approval, no sooner than 60 days from the announcement.

Written for “Trump Approves Firing Squad Execution For Nidal Hasan” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 145 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Trump Approves Firing Squad Execution For Nidal Hasan
Politics · 146 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 0% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Sydney Morning Herald
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 3 of 34 claims Outlet record 61/100
The Independent
Hedges 5 of 28 claims Outlet record 59/100
Euronews
Hedges 4 of 32 claims Outlet record 60/100
The Straits Times
Hedges 1 of 24 claims Outlet record 66/100
NPR
Hedges 7 of 47 claims Outlet record 60/100
NBC News
Hedges 4 of 21 claims Outlet record 60/100
National Post
Hedges 1 of 25 claims Outlet record 60/100
Toronto Star
Hedges 3 of 31 claims Outlet record 64/100
Global News
Hedges 7 of 46 claims Outlet record 63/100
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
53
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
0%
0 of 53 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
95/100
Los Angeles Times's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
146
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-09 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Los Angeles Times · 252 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Kevin Rector
15 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 - Courts have twice rejected the Trump administration’s bid to block the counting of 20,000 ballots it says may be from noncitizens; the Justice Department is appealing. -
🔮 A federal judge on Tuesday seemed skeptical of a Trump administration request to immediately block California officials from counting about 20,000 ballots from voters whose citizenship the administration questions, but said he would not issue a ruling until Wednesday.
🔮 They also raised questions as to whether the charges could be trusted to be accurate — citing similar accusations being disproved elsewhere in the country.
🔮 Trump was also able to appoint a host of loyalists with the help of the Republican-controlled Congress, who helped advance policies that less loyal agency heads would have balked at, and which were sure to draw additional legal challenges, experts said.
🔮 In a statement posted to social media, Guilfoyle said she will “forever be grateful” to Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio for trusting her to represent the U.S. abroad, remains “unwavering” in her support for them and “worked tirelessly to advance President Trump’s America First agenda, strengthen our strategic alliance with Greece, and deliver meaningful victories for the American people.”
🔮 The United Nations’ High Commissioner for Human Rights said that “the livestreaming of an execution is tantamount to a public execution and would breach the absolute prohibition of torture.”
🔮 Fewer than half of Americans believe the upcoming midterm elections will be “free and fair,” amid a broader decline in confidence in vote counts, according to a new nationwide poll.
🔮 - Click here to listen to this article - - The administration could try to impose new regulations for the 2028 elections.
🔮 California Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta, whose office is helping lead the states’ challenge, said the rule changes seek to “rewrite more than 100 years of law” by making even brief use of public benefits in years past grounds for the federal government to deny a person’s application for legal permanent residency in the future — which he said was clearly illegal and would push tremendous costs onto states, counties and cities.
🔮 - The Supreme Court is expected to rule relatively quickly, given the emergency nature of the appeal.
Also by Kevin Rector
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 15 articles by Kevin Rector →
Ana Ceballos
22 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 In final push, Trump rallies in red states, offering a rosy and off-script message - - Trump is rallying in Mississippi, Texas, Ohio, South Carolina and Kansas — longtime Republican strongholds where the party now worries its own voters may stay home. -
🔮 - The White House did not say how the tips should be submitted or who would oversee the process for the verifying the reports.
🔮 “I am hoping that after the election my mom will feel more secure. That if Texas turns blue, Trump will feel threatened.”
🔮 In a statement posted to social media, Guilfoyle said she will “forever be grateful” to Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio for trusting her to represent the U.S. abroad, remains “unwavering” in her support for them and “worked tirelessly to advance President Trump’s America First agenda, strengthen our strategic alliance with Greece, and deliver meaningful victories for the American people.”
🔮 The United Nations’ High Commissioner for Human Rights said that “the livestreaming of an execution is tantamount to a public execution and would breach the absolute prohibition of torture.”
🔮 The international scholars then take jobs and grants that could go to Americans.
🔮 President Trump told a crowd in Texas on Wednesday night that he would not allow Iran to attack San Diego or Los Angeles, a comment that came two days after he made off-the-cuff remarks suggesting the West Coast cities could be struck.
🔮 On Monday, he blamed the Golden State for the rising cost of gas prices, claimed without evidence that its elections are rigged, and at a Nebraska rally suggested Iran could “take out” Los Angeles and San Diego.
🔮 Rather than prioritizing visits to battleground districts, which will decide which party controls Congress, Trump is rallying in Republican strongholds such as Texas, Oklahoma and Alabama, betting that his presence will be enough to energize a base that may be thinking about sitting out the election because his name isn’t on the ballot.
🔮 Lawmakers and AI industry leaders have also called for guardrails on the nascent technology, which experts warn could soon surpass human understanding.
Also by Ana Ceballos
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 22 articles by Ana Ceballos →

Topics

Defense Democrats Republicans Texas U.S.

Subjects

Hasan PERSON · 4× U.S. GPE · 4× Texas GPE · 3× Defense ORG · 2× Democrats NORP · 2× Hegseth PERSON · 2× Iran GPE · 2× Nidal Malik Hasan PERSON · 2× Pete Hegseth PERSON · 2× Republicans NORP · 2×

Narrative

When the Supreme Court last year rejected an Alabama inmate’s request to be killed by firing squad rather than with nitrogen hypoxia, liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor — joined by fellow liberal Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson — dissented, writing, “Boyd asks for the barest form of mercy: to die by firing squad, which would kill him in seconds, rather than by a torturous suffocation lasting up to four minutes.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-09
🔮 The United Nations’ High Commissioner for Human Rights said that “the livestreaming of an execution is tantamount to a public execution and would breach the absolute prohibition of torture.”

Claims (53 extracted, 0 hedged)

U.S. plan to live-stream execution by firing squad draws bipartisan, international outrage asserted
plan → stream → outrage
- Click here to listen to this article - - Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said the Pentagon plans to live-stream the Dec. 3 execution of Nidal Malik Hasan, who killed 13 people at Fort Hood, Texas, in 2009. - asserted
who → click → 2009
Republicans and Democrats, human rights officials, religious leaders and legal experts condemned the broadcast plan. asserted
Republicans → condemn → plan
In confirming his plans to live-stream Fort Hood mass shooter Nidal Malik Hasan’s military execution by firing squad on Dec. 3, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth called it a “no brainer” punishment for a “radical Islamist terror attack” on U.S. service members. asserted
Hegseth → confirm → members
“We’ll make sure that people are able to watch it, that it’s public, because people need to understand [that] there are serious consequences for these types of things,” Hegseth said in an interview with the Real America’s Voice network. asserted
Hegseth → make → network
Others across the country and around the world — Democrats and Republicans, human rights experts, legal scholars and military and religious leaders — condemned it as a barbaric throwback to an era when executions were cast as entertainment, and as the world’s leading democracy adopting a form of punishment carried out in modern times only by authoritarian regimes and terrorist organizations. asserted
executions → condemn → regimes
“Hasan should face the death penalty, but making his execution public and streaming it? asserted
execution → face → it
Beyond disgusting,” Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) wrote on X. “Public executions are what oppressive dictatorships like Iran and Afghanistan do. asserted
dictatorships → write → Iran
It should not be happening in America.” asserted
It → happen → America
“I absolutely support the sentence of death, but live-streaming executions is what jihadists do. asserted
jihadists → support → what
America is better than that,” Rep. Austin Scott (R-Ga.) wrote. asserted
Scott → write → that
The United Nations’ High Commissioner for Human Rights said that “the livestreaming of an execution is tantamount to a public execution and would breach the absolute prohibition of torture.” asserted
livestreaming → say → torture
The head of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops said it would “further undermine the moral fabric of our nation and be a blight on the conscience of its people.” asserted
it → say → people
The suspect, stable after being shot himself, is accused of killing 13 and wounding 30 at the Texas Army base. asserted
suspect → shoot → base
It’s not clear whether he is the author of inflammatory comments on the Web. asserted
he → ’ → Web
Matthew Robinson, a criminal justice professor at Appalachian State University and author of a book on U.S. capital punishment titled “Death Nation,” said he was “appalled” by the plans. asserted
he → title → plans
“It strikes me as meant to be entertaining.” asserted
It → strike → me
He said the last military execution was in 1961, and the last by firing squad was in 1945. asserted
last → say → 1945
Hasan was an Army psychiatrist and major who in 2009 entered a medical building on the Texas military base with a laser-sighted handgun, shouted “Allahu akbar” — Arabic for “God is great!” — and opened fire, killing 13 people and injuring 32 others. asserted
God → enter → others
He has since spoken of being a “martyr” if executed. asserted
He → speak → ?
President Trump, an outspoken proponent of the death penalty for years but also a past critic of public executions in places like Iran, has signed off on Hasan’s execution but not addressed Hegseth’s plans. asserted
Trump → sign → plans
The White House did not respond to a request for comment. asserted
House → respond → comment
Vice President JD Vance, who is Catholic, said Friday that people should remember that Hasan “brutally murdered a lot of innocent people.” asserted
Hasan → say → people
But he also said he would not watch a live-stream of the execution, and expressed doubt that is “actually going to happen.” asserted
that → say → doubt
On his first day in office this term, Trump issued an executive order requiring federal agencies to restore the death penalty to prominence. asserted
Trump → issue → prominence
In April, the U.S. Department of Justice announced it had taken steps to do so, including by “expanding the protocol” to include firing squads. asserted
it → announce → squads
Five states currently allow firing squads to carry out executions: Idaho, Mississippi, Oklahoma, South Carolina and Utah. asserted
squads → allow → executions
The U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly turned down appeals contending such executions amount to “cruel and unusual punishment,” which is barred under U.S. law. asserted
which → turn → law
South Carolina executed three men by firing squad last year. asserted
Carolina → execute → squad
When the Supreme Court last year rejected an Alabama inmate’s request to be killed by firing squad rather than with nitrogen hypoxia, liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor — joined by fellow liberal Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson — dissented, writing, “Boyd asks for the barest form of mercy: to die by firing squad, which would kill him in seconds, rather than by a torturous suffocation lasting up to four minutes. asserted
which → reject → suffocation
The Constitution would grant him that grace. asserted
Constitution → grant → grace
Last week, a Tennessee inmate named Christa Pike survived what was meant to be a lethal injection of the barbiturate pentobarbital. asserted
what → name → pentobarbital
Other states have also struggled with executions by lethal injection in recent years. asserted
states → struggle → years
Much of the criticism of Hegseth’s plan for Hasan has centered not on the method of killing, but on the live-streaming of it. asserted
Much → center → it
Robin M. Maher, executive director of the Death Penalty Information Center, said the center has “no record of any execution being live streamed,” and is “not aware of any regulation or precedent for a military execution to be live streamed on the internet or otherwise made widely available to the public.” asserted
execution → say → public
Fox News commentator Howard Kurtz wrote: “I’m sensing revulsion on the left and right, not so much for killing a death row prisoner — although firing squad seems extreme in the modern age — but for the Pentagon to live-stream it, turning this into a horrifying TV show to entertain the masses. asserted
Pentagon → write → masses
Daniel LaChance, an associate history professor at Emory University and author of the book “Executing Freedom: The Cultural Life of Capital Punishment in the United States,” said the last public execution in the U.S. occurred in 1936, when a Black man convicted of rape was hanged in Kentucky — which still allowed public executions after most states had abandoned the practice. asserted
states → execute → practice
That execution was “by all accounts a grotesque carnival” and “sort of like a gladiatorial contest brought to life in the 20th Century, where the crowd was surly, shouting,” LaChance said. asserted
LaChance → bring → Century
That the Trump administration is seeking to turn capital punishment into a public spectacle once more, LaChance said, is out of line with decades of thinking on the issue, but in line with Trump’s own ethos about crime and punishment. asserted
LaChance → seek → crime
And when executions moved into the bowels of prisons in the early 20th century, they were really becoming bureaucratic affairs, run by experts, carried out in front of a small group of professionals and clergy,” LaChance said. asserted
LaChance → move → professionals
…and 13 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support