Photo via New York Post

US judge rules DOJ using state voter rolls unconstitutional

Read the original at New York Post ↗
Cite

Reuters. (2026, October 10). US judge rules DOJ using state voter rolls unconstitutional. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2026/10/09/us-news/us-judge-rules-doj-using-state-voter-rolls-unconstitutional/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

New York Post · collected 2026-10-10 · by Reuters

Quick Summary

On October 9, 2026, US District Judge Sparkle Sooknanan ruled that the Justice Department's practice of using state voter rolls to check against a federal immigration database and remove ineligible voters was unconstitutional. The judge, appointed by President Joe Biden, determined that this action overstepped federal authority and undermined states' constitutional role in managing elections. This decision follows another recent ruling where Sooknanan blocked the Trump administration from employing an expanded version of the SAVE database for voter roll checks, though the Supreme Court temporarily paused that earlier decision.
Written by AI on 2026-10-10, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

US District Judge Sparkle Sooknanan ruled on Friday that the Justice Department's efforts to use state voter rolls and cross-check them against the federal Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) database was unlawful. The decision, spanning 78 pages, sided with watchdog group Common Cause. The judge criticized the administration for underestimating the risk of wrongly removing eligible voters due to inaccuracies in the SAVE database. This ruling is seen as a setback for President Donald Trump's plans to increase federal oversight ahead of the November 3 midterms and challenges Republicans' efforts to maintain control over Congress. Ming Cheung, a lawyer with the American Civil Liberties Union, stated that the ruling prevents the administration from using the federal government to disrupt elections or put voters’ rights at risk. The Justice Department is currently reviewing the decision but has not commented further.

Written for “Voter Data Lawsuit Settlement” on 2026-11-04, grounded in this article and the 1 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Voter Data Lawsuit Settlement
Politics · 2 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 24% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Al Jazeera
Hedges 3 of 19 claims Outlet record 60/100
Fox News
Hedges 5 of 27 claims Outlet record 68/100
“The articles describe different aspects of election integrity efforts: one focuses on a judge's ruling against DOJ using state voter rolls, while the other reports on federal charges across multiple states for illegal voting and fraud.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
17
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
24%
4 of 17 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
66/100
New York Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
2
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-10 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

New York Post · 16794 article(s) · 36 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 36 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Reuters
877 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory, weighing roughly 3,200 pounds (1,452 kg), was set to tumble out of orbit and burn up in the atmosphere somewhere over the tropics, with fragments surviving re-entry unlikely to threaten populated areas, according to Nasa.
🔮 Trump struck a conciliatory note despite his history of questioning election results, telling The New York Times: “I am absolutely willing to accept those results” and promising to “work with the Democrats.” But minutes later on social media the 80-year-old signaled how he intends to deal with Democratic attempts to pass laws, posting a picture of a red baseball cap emblazoned: “VETO.”
🔮 Democrats have seized control of both houses of Congress, in a rout of President Donald Trump’s Republicans in the midterm elections, US networks projected.
🔮 Democrats won the House and were within reach of taking over the Senate in a rapidly building midterms wave Tuesday projected to sweep Republicans aside and deliver a stinging repudiation of Donald Trump’s bruising presidency.
🔮 Mr. Cooper, 69, will replace Republican Senator Thom Tillis, who announced his retirement after breaking with Mr. Trump over Medicaid cuts in the president’s signature tax and spending law.
🔮 The US justice department said on Tuesday that Donald Trump’s proposed 250ft (76 meter) triumphal arch in Washington would not be completed until after the end of his second term.
🔮 Around $2.85bn of the stolen $6.34bn has been frozen, Binance said, meaning that the attackers could not use it or convert it to another currency.
🔮 Industry officials warn prolonged closures could delay shipments and damage Bangladesh’s reputation as a reliable sourcing hub as it competes with rivals such as Vietnam and India for global apparel orders.
🔮 “The Russians believe that America will not notice this signal from them.
🔮 US President Donald Trump on Tuesday said he made a deal with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that Washington would stop $4 billion in funding to Israel after the end of this year.
Wire or desk byline, not an individual reporter.
Also by Reuters
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 877 articles by Reuters →

Topics

Congress DOJ SAVE the Justice Department the Justice Department’s

Subjects

the Justice Department ORG · 6× Sooknanan PERSON · 5× Congress ORG · 2× Democratic NORP · 2× Republican NORP · 2× SAVE ORG · 2× Trump PERSON · 2× the Justice Department’s ORG · 2× DOJ ORG · 1× Reuters ORG · 1×

Narrative

Supreme Court Paused Previous Ruling Ming Cheung, a lawyer with the American Civil Liberties Union who represented the plaintiffs, said in a statement, “Today’s ruling makes clear that the administration cannot use the federal government to disrupt elections.” The Justice Department is reviewing the decision, a spokesperson said.
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-10
🔮 In a 78-page decision siding with a challenge to the Justice Department’s practice brought by watchdog group Common Cause, Sooknanan wrote that the Justice Department had downplayed the risk that its practice would wrongfully disenfranchise eligible US citizens despite evidence that the immigration database, known as SAVE, could be inaccurate.
2026-10-10 · New York Post
US judge rules DOJ using state voter rolls unconstitutional · mixed framing

Claims (17 extracted, 4 hedged)

US judge rules DOJ using state voter rolls unconstitutional By asserted
DOJ → rule → rolls
A US judge ruled on Friday that the Justice Department’s push to obtain state voter rolls and check them against a federal immigration database to demand that states remove voters it deemed ineligible was unlawful. asserted
it → rule → voters
US District Judge Sparkle Sooknanan’s decision marked the latest setback for President Donald Trump’s push to expand federal control over election administration ahead of the November 3 midterms, with his Republican Party battling to hold majorities in both houses of Congress. asserted
Party → mark → Congress
In a 78-page decision siding with a challenge to the Justice Department’s practice brought by watchdog group Common Cause, Sooknanan wrote that the Justice Department had downplayed the risk that its practice would wrongfully disenfranchise eligible US citizens despite evidence that the immigration database, known as SAVE, could be inaccurate. uncertain
database → side → SAVE
“The challenged policy represents the federal government’s attempt to decide who gets to vote. asserted
who → challenge → attempt
But Congress has left that authority where our Constitution has always placed it: with the states,” wrote Sooknanan, who is based in Washington and was appointed by Democratic President Joe Biden. asserted
who → leave → Biden
Supreme Court Paused Previous Ruling Ming Cheung, a lawyer with the American Civil Liberties Union who represented the plaintiffs, said in a statement, “Today’s ruling makes clear that the administration cannot use the federal government to disrupt elections.” The Justice Department is reviewing the decision, a spokesperson said. asserted
spokesperson → pause → decision
In a separate case, Sooknanan blocked the Trump administration in June from using an expanded version of the SAVE database to check the accuracy of voter rolls. asserted
Sooknanan → block → rolls
The US Supreme Court temporarily paused that decision last month. asserted
Court → pause → decision
Federal election law prohibits the systematic review of voter rolls in the 90 days before any federal election, potentially blunting the impact of both Sooknanan’s decision and the Supreme Court’s pause of her previous order on the upcoming midterms. asserted
law → prohibit → midterms
Latest Defeat for Justice Department Trump, who falsely claims his loss in the 2020 presidential election was due to voter fraud, ordered the Justice Department last year to crack down on voting by ineligible people, despite multiple state audits and independent studies showing such voter fraud is rare. The Justice Department then demanded that nearly all 50 states hand over their complete, unredacted voter rolls, including sensitive information such as voters’ Social Security numbers or dates of birth. uncertain
states → claim → birth
Eighteen mostly Republican-led states complied. asserted
states → lead → ?
After receiving the voter data, the Justice Department ran it through SAVE and alerted states to voters found to be non-citizens so the states could remove them. uncertain
states → receive → them
Start your day with all you need to know Morning Report delivers the latest news, videos, photos and more. asserted
Report → start → news
Sooknanan said the Trump administration’s expansion of SAVE meant it now contained citizenship data from the Social Security Administration, which could be outdated, meaning many immigrants who had since been naturalized as US citizens would still be flagged as non-citizens. uncertain
who → say → citizens
The Justice Department sued 30 Democratic-led and Republican states that refused to hand over their unredacted voter rolls, as well as Washington, DC. asserted
that → sue → rolls
It has lost 26 of those cases so far, without winning one. asserted
It → lose → one
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support