Photo via Washington Examiner

Blue state taxpayers are funding red state scholarships — and their governors don’t care

Read the original at Washington Examiner ↗
Cite

McIntosh, D. (2026, October 12). Blue state taxpayers are funding red state scholarships — and their governors don’t care. Washington Examiner. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/op-eds/4761516/democratic-governors-school-freedom-tax-credit/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Washington Examiner · collected 2026-10-12 · by David McIntosh

Quick Summary

Democratic governors in several blue states are refusing to join a federal tax credit program for education scholarships, despite it costing their state nothing and potentially benefiting students with free educational support. The program, signed into law by former President Donald Trump, allows taxpayers to claim credits of up to $1,700 (or $3,400 for married couples filing jointly) for contributions to scholarship-granting organizations, which could result in over 2.2 million scholarships annually by 2030. Critics argue that this initiative is a political move rather than an effort to improve education quality, with some governors viewing it as a scheme to undermine public schools despite the program's flexibility in how funds can be used.
Written by AI on 2026-10-12, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

In late 2023, the Treasury Department and IRS proposed regulations for a federal tax credit program initiated by President Donald Trump, which allows taxpayers to receive credits for contributions to scholarship-granting organizations. This initiative aims to fund scholarships worth nearly $26 billion annually by 2030, potentially helping up to 2.2 million students yearly. However, twenty states, predominantly led by Democratic governors, have opted out of the program despite it costing their states nothing and offering free scholarships for their residents. Critics argue that these governors are prioritizing political ideology over educational benefits, as the program also injects new money into the states for educational services like tutoring and special-needs support. The move highlights a divide between state leaders who prefer federal involvement with strict guidelines and those supporting parent-led empowerment in education choices.

Written for “State Taxpayer Disparity” on 2026-11-04, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 State Taxpayer Disparity
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans right and hedges 9% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
New York Post
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 5 of 31 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles describe different aspects of the implementation of a federal scholarship program, with Article A focusing on New York's Governor Hochul officially opting in and Article B criticizing Democratic governors for not participating.”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 5 of 42 claims Outlet record 69/100
“Article A discusses Democratic governors refusing to join a program without specifying any particular governor's action, while Article B mentions Governor Kathy Hochul (D-NY) opting into the program specifically on a Friday.”
Reason
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 3 of 31 claims Outlet record 67/100
“Article A discusses a proposed national program while Article B covers a court ruling on Ohio's existing EdChoice scholarship program.”
New York Post
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 0 of 10 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A discusses Democratic governors refusing to join a school scholarship program, while Article B focuses on the UFT chief's reaction to New York families benefiting from federal Education Freedom scholarships. Although both articles touch on related topics and policies, they describe different specific reactions and events.”
Reason
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 2 of 34 claims Outlet record 67/100
“The articles discuss related policy developments but describe different aspects of it: Article A focuses on the introduction and upcoming implementation of the EFTC, while Article B discusses reactions to proposed regulations by a specific date.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
45
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
9%
4 of 45 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
69/100
Washington Examiner's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-12 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Washington Examiner · 4074 article(s) · 8 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 8 correction(s)

Who wrote this

David McIntosh
2 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The Treasury Department estimates that by 2030, more than 11 million taxpayers could give nearly $26 billion a year, funding as many as 2.2 million scholarships annually.
🔮 The Less Tax Paperwork for Digital Asset Owners Act would reduce the tax consequences of small network fees, simplify accounting for widely traded assets, and provide more sensible treatment for certain dollar-pegged stablecoin transactions.
Also by David McIntosh
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

Democratic Democrats IRS Washington the Treasury Department

Subjects

the Treasury Department ORG · 4× Arizona GPE · 2× Democrats NORP · 2× Washington GPE · 2× Wisconsin GPE · 2× Democratic NORP · 1× Donald Trump PERSON · 1× IRS ORG · 1× Ted Cruz PERSON · 1× The Club for Growth ORG · 1×

Narrative

What else explains a governor refusing to join a program that costs his state nothing, gives his students free scholarships, and pulls new money into the state for tutoring, textbooks, and special-needs services?
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-12
🔮 The Treasury Department estimates that by 2030, more than 11 million taxpayers could give nearly $26 billion a year, funding as many as 2.2 million scholarships annually.

Claims (45 extracted, 4 hedged)

Are Democratic governors playing politics with education? asserted
governors → play → education
What else explains a governor refusing to join a program that costs his state nothing, gives his students free scholarships, and pulls new money into the state for tutoring, textbooks, and special-needs services? asserted
that → explain → tutoring
On Thursday, the Treasury Department and the IRS issued proposed regulations for the first national school freedom program. asserted
Department → issue → program
It is a federal tax credit for contributions to scholarship-granting organizations, signed into law by President Donald Trump and championed for years by Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX). asserted
It → grant → Cruz
Twenty states, nearly all led by Democrats, have not opted in. asserted
all → lead → Democrats
Their governors like federal involvement in education only when it arrives with strings attached and a one-size-fits-all mandate from Washington. asserted
size → like → Washington
Offer them a federal tax credit program that empowers parents instead of bureaucrats, and they say no. asserted
they → offer → parents
But children in those states deserve better than political posturing. asserted
children → deserve → posturing
On the 2024 National Assessment of Educational Progress, 45% of high school seniors scored below basic in math and 32% below basic in reading. asserted
% → score → reading
Twelfth-grade reading hit the lowest average in the exam’s history. asserted
reading → hit → history
A mother whose third-grader reads below grade level has heard all of this before. asserted
grader → read → this
She doesn’t need statistics. asserted
She → need → statistics
She needs help. asserted
She → need → help
That is where the new program comes in. asserted
program → come → ?
Starting in 2027, any taxpayer can claim a dollar-for-dollar credit of up to $1,700 for contributions to a qualified scholarship organization in any participating state, regardless of where the donor lives. uncertain
donor → start → state
Married couples filing jointly can claim $3,400. uncertain
couples → file → 3,400
The Treasury Department estimates that by 2030, more than 11 million taxpayers could give nearly $26 billion a year, funding as many as 2.2 million scholarships annually. uncertain
taxpayers → estimate → scholarships
Under the proposed rules and safe harbors, about 96% of children in participating states would be eligible. asserted
% → propose → states
The Club for Growth submitted comments to the Treasury Department urging the regulations to recognize that the credit belongs to each individual taxpayer, with no marriage penalty. asserted
credit → submit → penalty
Thousands of our members filed comments in support. asserted
Thousands → file → support
We are glad the Treasury Department agreed. asserted
Department → agree → ?
A married couple who each give $1,700 can claim the full $3,400 credit on their joint return. uncertain
who → give → return
Congress wrote no marriage penalty into this law, and regulators didn’t invent one. asserted
regulators → write → one
Critics call this a voucher scheme to drain public schools. asserted
Critics → call → schools
The program works even if a child never leaves the public school down the street. asserted
child → work → street
The Treasury Department’s own summary of qualified expenses includes academic tutoring, special-needs services, books, supplies, and computers. asserted
summary → include → tutoring
A public school parent can use a scholarship to hire an outside reading tutor or cover special needs services. asserted
parent → use → services
The child doesn’t change schools. asserted
child → change → schools
The district doesn’t lose a dollar. asserted
district → lose → dollar
The only thing that changes is who decides how the help is delivered. asserted
help → change → ?
Thirty states have already opted in. asserted
states → opt → ?
Gov. Jared Polis (D-CO) got there first among Democrats. asserted
Polis → get → Democrats
He called participation a “no-brainer” and said Colorado should go after donors in states that decline. asserted
that → call → states
Refusing the program ensures that money leaves the state. asserted
money → refuse → state
A donor in Chicago or Los Angeles can direct a $1,700 gift to a scholarship organization in Denver or Dallas, and the credit is just as good. asserted
credit → direct → Denver
Every year a governor stalls is a year the state’s taxpayers fund other states’ children. asserted
taxpayers → stall → children
The governors of Arizona and Wisconsin vetoed opt-in bills. asserted
governors → veto → bills
Gov. Kathy Hochul (D-NY) says she plans to opt in but hasn’t, and teachers unions are pressing her to reject it. asserted
unions → say → it
It imposes no curriculum, no testing regime, no mandate on any district. asserted
It → impose → district
It asks a governor to do one thing: certify the nonprofit organizations in the state that meet the federal criteria so that its own citizens can benefit. asserted
citizens → ask → criteria
…and 5 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support