Photo via Mother Jones

“We’re the Outliers Here”: UK-Led Sanctions on Israeli Settlements Isolate the US

Read the original at Mother Jones ↗
Cite

Hurwitz, S. (2026, September 10). “We’re the Outliers Here”: UK-Led Sanctions on Israeli Settlements Isolate the US. Mother Jones. https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2026/09/uk-banned-imports-from-israeli-settlements-progressives-west-bank-usa-huckabee/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Mother Jones · collected 2026-09-10 · by Sophie Hurwitz

Quick Summary

The UK, along with 11 other nations, has imposed sanctions on Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank by banning imports of goods from these areas. The move is in response to allegations that settlers have displaced 107 West Bank communities and frequently attack Palestinians with military backup since 2023. US officials, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Ambassador Mike Huckabee, have spoken out against the sanctions, threatening repercussions for trade relationships between the UK and the US. Six Democratic legislators have commended the UK's decision, calling it a necessary step towards achieving peace in the region.
Written by AI on 2026-09-10, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Ed Miliband, UK Foreign Secretary, announced plans to impose sanctions on goods from Israeli settlements in the West Bank, marking a significant shift in Britain’s foreign policy towards Israel. This move, supported by France and Canada, aims to curb settlement expansion and support the "two-state solution," although it has drawn criticism from Israeli officials and US Ambassador Mike Huckabee.

The plan includes banning imports of products made in Israeli settlements, which are considered illegal under international law but disputed by Israel. Mike Huckabee, a Trump-appointed ambassador to Israel, accused Miliband of promoting “Jew hate” over the announcement, despite Miliband himself being Jewish.

Miliband defended the decision during a parliamentary session on September 8, stating that Britain could no longer remain passive and must act against injustices in Gaza and the West Bank. He emphasized that the UK believes Israeli settlement expansion is unlawful and involves ethnic cleansing of Palestinians. The ban targets approximately 700,000 Israelis living in settlements, estimated to constitute a small portion of bilateral trade valued at $8.12 billion.

Critics argue that these measures risk damaging diplomatic relations between Britain and Israel, while supporters see it as necessary for peace efforts. Israeli President Isaac Herzog warned the UK's decision would place them “on the wrong side of history,” highlighting potential repercussions on national security and intelligence cooperation.

Written for “UK Israel Settlement Sanctions Policy” on 2026-11-05, grounded in this article and the 24 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 UK Israel Settlement Sanctions Policy
Politics · 25 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 14% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Al Jazeera
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 0 of 29 claims Outlet record 60/100
ABC News (AU)
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 1 of 5 claims Outlet record 67/100
TIME
Hedges 6 of 57 claims Outlet record 59/100
The Guardian
Hedges 5 of 28 claims Outlet record 66/100
The Hindu
Hedges 1 of 13 claims Outlet record 60/100
South China Morning Post
Hedges 1 of 6 claims Outlet record 62/100
NPR
Hedges 1 of 19 claims Outlet record 60/100
Toronto Star
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 0 of 7 claims Outlet record 64/100
Al Jazeera
Hedges 2 of 6 claims Outlet record 60/100
ABC News (US)
Hedges 5 of 32 claims Outlet record 67/100
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
28
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
14%
4 of 28 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
60/100
Mother Jones's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
25
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-10 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Mother Jones · 489 article(s) · 1 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 1 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Sophie Hurwitz
52 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The Republican Party’s losses in the House and Senate, he said, could be blamed on Trump’s war on Iran and America’s relationship to Israel.
2026-11-04 · assertive framing · Warmongers Blame War For Election Loss
🔮 In some ways, the outcome of Tennessee’s ninth district congressional election was determined in May, when Republican Gov. Bill Lee and the Tennessee legislature redrew the state’s legislative maps—carving Tennessee’s sole district in which white voters were not a majority into three new ones designed to lean Republican, following an April Supreme Court ruling that gutted the federal Voting Rights Act.
🔮 But the day before the election, most Mainers still believed Collins would win, according to the Bangor Daily News.
🔮 The hard-fought measure—which would have amended the state constitution to ban almost all abortions as well as gender-affirming care for minors—lost with only 44 percent of the vote.
🔮 The hard-fought measure—which would have amended the state constitution to ban almost all abortions as well as gender-affirming care for minors—lost with only 44 percent of the vote.
🔮 On the morning of Election Day, Donald Trump went on Fox & Friends to deliver a surprise announcement: The United States, he said, would be cutting off $4 billion in aid to Israel at the end of the year.
2026-11-03 · assertive framing · Trump’s Big Announcement on Israel Means Nothing
🔮 She demanded that El-Sayed publicly disavow it as a precondition for appearing at an event with him on Sunday; it is not clear whether the event will go forward.
🔮 The share of America’s GDP contingent on data center buildout is now somewhere between 2 percent and 4 percent; total investment in the industry through 2032 is predicted to sit in the neighborhood of $10 trillion, per a recent Brookings Institution report.
🔮 Americans, meanwhile, are paying the price—the median US household has spent $856 more at the gas pump than they otherwise would have since the war started.
🔮 In a global labor action of record scale, dockworkers in 22 countries will strike on Friday to protest the use of their ports for arms exports.
2026-10-29 · assertive framing · A Global Port Strike Could Freeze $2 Billion in Freight
Also by Sophie Hurwitz
Warmongers Blame War For Election Loss
2026-11-04 · Mother Jones
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 52 articles by Sophie Hurwitz →

Topics

British Florida Israel Israeli West Bank

Subjects

Israel GPE · 7× Israeli NORP · 7× Florida GPE · 5× West Bank GPE · 4× British NORP · 3× Duss PERSON · 3× Democrats NORP · 2× Il. GPE · 2× Tx. GPE · 2× the United States GPE · 2×

Narrative

Eleven other nations—Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Iceland, Ireland, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Spain and Sweden—signed a joint statement with the UK, saying they too plan to introduce sanctions prohibiting trade in goods with the settlements. “The Government of Israel must immediately halt the expansion of settlements and civilian administrative powers, ensure accountability for settler violence, and investigate allegations against Israeli forces,” the foreign ministers of the twelve countries wrote.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-10
🔮 Rep. Randy Fine (R-Fl.) said the sanctions could impact British trade with the state of Florida, which currently has a law on the books banning any company that boycotts Israel from doing business in the state.

Claims (28 extracted, 4 hedged)

On September 8, the British government banned the import of goods from Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank. asserted
government → ban → Bank
Eleven other nations—Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Iceland, Ireland, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Spain and Sweden—signed a joint statement with the UK, saying they too plan to introduce sanctions prohibiting trade in goods with the settlements. “The Government of Israel must immediately halt the expansion of settlements and civilian administrative powers, ensure accountability for settler violence, and investigate allegations against Israeli forces,” the foreign ministers of the twelve countries wrote. asserted
ministers → sign → countries
Since 2023, according to a Human Rights Watch report, Israeli settlers have fully or partially displaced 107 different West Bank communities. uncertain
settlers → accord → communities
With Israeli military backup, settlers frequently attack and kill Palestinians. asserted
settlers → attack → Palestinians
In July of 2024, the United Nations’ top court declared that settlements in the West Bank—housing over 500,000 Jewish Israelis, buoyed by religious fervor and generous government tax breaks—are illegal under international law. asserted
settlements → declare → law
Nonetheless, West Bank settlers are subsidized by millions of dollars from US nonprofit organizations, and are rarely, if ever, condemned by the US government. asserted
settlers → subsidize → government
US officials quickly spoke out against the British sanctions. asserted
officials → speak → sanctions
“Obviously we’re not going to do what the UK did,” Secretary of State Marco Rubio said. asserted
Rubio → go → State
US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee threatened pushback. asserted
Huckabee → threaten → pushback
“If the Brits go and put some kind of boycott and sanctions on them, the repercussions are going to be significant,” Huckabee told the BBC. asserted
Huckabee → go → BBC
Rep. Randy Fine (R-Fl.) said the sanctions could impact British trade with the state of Florida, which currently has a law on the books banning any company that boycotts Israel from doing business in the state. uncertain
that → say → state
“Florida has made it clear. asserted
it → make → ?
Any company—or nation—that boycotts Israel is boycotted by Florida,” Fine wrote on social media. asserted
Fine → boycott → media
This might harm Florida more than it does the UK, though. uncertain
it → harm → UK
Great Britain is the single largest foreign investor in the state, which would lose out on billions of dollars if Florida were to boycott UK companies over Israel. asserted
Florida → lose → Israel
“ Why are we ruining our relationship with the United Kingdom over Israeli settlements?” asked Matt Duss of the Center for International Policy, who was previously a foreign policy advisor to Bernie Sanders. asserted
who → ruin → Sanders
“This is something I think that most Americans just find ridiculous.” asserted
Americans → think → ?
Six Democratic legislators have commended the United Kingdom’s choice to ban trade in settlement products. asserted
legislators → commend → products
Greg Casar (D-Tx.), chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, said in a social media post that “the US must do the same.” asserted
US → say → same
Joaquin Castro (D-Tx.) also applauded the move as a “step in the right direction,” standing against “an ugly land grab carried out through violence and terrorism.” “Any American President serious about achieving peace should do the same,” Castro added. asserted
Castro → applaud → same
Senator Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), Rep. Jonathan L. Jackson (D-Il.), Rep. Chuy Garcia (D-Il.) and Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA) also threw their support behind the sanctions. asserted
Hollen → throw → sanctions
Some analysts want to see the US join in on sanctioning Israel—and even go further. asserted
US → want → Israel
“When Democrats take power in the next Congress, and when hopefully Democrats take back the White House, I want to see people talking about what further, more expansive, and even more serious measures they’re willing to take,” said Duss. asserted
Duss → take → measures
That could include sanctioning any banks that finance mortgages in West Bank settlements, Duss said. uncertain
Duss → include → settlements
“A very key part of sustaining Israeli impunity is the fact that it’s backed by the United States, and the United States is the one that punishes people for imposing consequences on Israel,” he added. asserted
he → sustain → Israel
“Banning trade with illegal settlements is something we should have done decades ago.” asserted
we → ban → settlements
“It tells the US and Israel that we’re outliers here,” Duss said. asserted
Duss → tell → US
“I think the question will be, how many of America’s historic alliances are we willing to undermine and destroy on behalf of this extremist Israeli settlement project? asserted
we → think → project
💬Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

🕘History 🎫Support