Submit Your Articles to the Journal of Free Speech Law, Before You Circulate Them to the Law Reviews

Read the original at Reason ↗
Cite

Volokh, E. (2026, October 13). Submit Your Articles to the Journal of Free Speech Law, Before You Circulate Them to the Law Reviews. Reason. https://reason.com/volokh/2026/10/13/submit-your-articles-to-the-journal-of-free-speech-law-before-you-circulate-them-to-the-law-reviews-6/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Reason · collected 2026-10-13 · by Eugene Volokh

Quick Summary

The Journal of Free Speech Law, which is now five years old, invites scholars to submit articles on free speech before the usual law reviews reopen in August. The journal has published over 150 articles by renowned academics and emerging scholars and has been cited in 11 court cases, more than 2000 articles, and at least 100 briefs. Submissions are guaranteed an answer within 14 days, and accepted papers can be published quickly if the authors wish, potentially a year before they appear in other law journals.
Written by AI on 2026-10-13, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

The Journal of Free Speech Law, established five years ago, has published over 150 peer-reviewed articles by renowned scholars such as Jack Balkin from Yale and Mark Lemley from Stanford, among others. The journal aims to provide a platform for both established figures and emerging young academics, including those without tenure-track positions. Since its inception, the articles have been cited in 11 court cases, over 2000 scholarly works, and at least 100 legal briefs according to Google Scholar counts. Eugene Volokh encourages authors planning to submit their work on free speech topics to traditional law reviews this August to consider submitting exclusively to his journal first, promising a response within 14 days. If accepted, articles can be published quickly if they meet the necessary formatting and citation standards.

Written for “Academic Publishing Guidelines” on 2026-11-02, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Academic Publishing Guidelines
Education · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
16
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
12%
2 of 16 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
67/100
Reason's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Education
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-13 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Reason · 1053 article(s) · 4 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 4 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Eugene Volokh
183 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Some excerpts from the long First Superseding Indictment in U.S. v. Hakim (E.D. Mich.), filed Oct. 21, alleging conspiracy to transmit threats in interstate commerce as well as, for two defendants, witness intimidation and destruction of property to prevent seizure (8 of the 12 defendants had originally been indicted in May); the targets included UM officials and businesses connected with them, as well as the Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Detroit:
🔮 Because "[t]he costs and efforts required to defend a lawsuit through [discovery] could chill free speech nearly as effectively as the absence of the actual malice standard altogether[,]" a public figure plaintiff must plausibly allege actual malice at the outset of the litigation.
🔮 The First Amendment forbids a State from using its investigative power that way, and I will not allow it while this case is pending.
🔮 The same logic could apply to nuns who had felt religious pressure to do the educational or nursing work that their order was known for, or to monks who had felt religious pressure to do agricultural work that supports the monastery.
2026-10-30 · assertive framing · Amicus Brief in OneTaste Criminal Prosecution
🔮 Before doing so, "he entered the coffee shop to purchase a cookie, which he hoped would be seen as a sign of goodwill."
🔮 While individuals who are the subjects of unwanted speech may be able to limit some speech directed to them, they cannot limit offensive speech about them directed to others.
🔮 Because "the conduct regulated depend[ed] on—and [could not] be separated from—the ideas communicated," Florida's law was "functionally a regulation of speech" implicating the First Amendment.
🔮 You might assume that some judge is "woke" or "Trumpy" or what have you, but there's a pretty good chance that the judge's legal analysis is still correct.
🔮 The hope would be to siphon votes away from Sullivan.
🔮 Alas, like other formerly unique human skills, I expect this one too will fall victim to competition from AI.
Also by Eugene Volokh
Open Thread
2026-11-01 · Reason
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 183 articles by Eugene Volokh →

Topics

Columbia Journal of Free Speech Law Penn Stanford Yale

Subjects

Columbia GPE · 2× Christopher Yoo PERSON · 1× Jack Balkin PERSON · 1× Jane Ginsburg PERSON · 1× Journal of Free Speech Law ORG · 1× Mark Lemley PERSON · 1× Penn ORG · 1× Philip Hamburger PERSON · 1× Stanford ORG · 1× Yale ORG · 1×

Narrative

Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent Our peer-reviewed Journal of Free Speech Law, which is now five years old, has published over 150 articles, including by Jack Balkin (Yale), Mark Lemley (Stanford), Jane Ginsburg (Columbia), Philip Hamburger (Columbia), Christopher Yoo (Penn), Stuart Benjamin (Duke), Andrew Koppelman (Northwestern), and many others—both prominent figures in the field and emerging young scholars, including ones who didn't have a tenure-track academic appointment.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-13
🔮 But if you submit exclusively to us before that, we will give you an answer within 14 days; and then if you'd like to have it published quickly, we can publish it in within a few months, if it's sufficiently clean and cite-checked by your research assistant.

Claims (16 extracted, 2 hedged)

Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent Our peer-reviewed Journal of Free Speech Law, which is now five years old, has published over 150 articles, including by Jack Balkin (Yale), Mark Lemley (Stanford), Jane Ginsburg (Columbia), Philip Hamburger (Columbia), Christopher Yoo (Penn), Stuart Benjamin (Duke), Andrew Koppelman (Northwestern), and many others—both prominent figures in the field and emerging young scholars, including ones who didn't have a tenure-track academic appointment. asserted
who → review → appointment
(This list doesn't include our reprinting others' symposia, which have also included many other top scholars, such as Robert Post, Mark Tushnet, Geoffrey Stone, Lee Bollinger, Jeremy Waldron, Danielle Citron, Genevieve Lakier, and more.) asserted
which → include → Post
The articles have been cited so far in 11 court cases, over 2000 articles (using Google Scholar counts), and at least 100 briefs. asserted
using → cite → Scholar
And note that all the articles have only had five years or less to attract these citations. asserted
articles → note → citations
I expect that many authors are planning to submit articles on free speech to the usual law reviews when the submission cycle restarts in August. asserted
cycle → expect → August
But if you submit exclusively to us before that, we will give you an answer within 14 days; and then if you'd like to have it published quickly, we can publish it in within a few months, if it's sufficiently clean and cite-checked by your research assistant. asserted
it → submit → assistant
This means your article can be published by us, if it's accepted, almost a year (or more) before it would be published by the law journals. asserted
it → mean → journals
Of course, also please pass this along to friends or colleagues who you think might be interested. uncertain
you → pass → friends
Note that the submissions don't compete for a limited number of slots in an issue or volume; we'll publish articles that satisfy our quality standards whenever we get them. asserted
we → note → them
All submissions must be exclusive to us, but, again, you'll have an answer within 14 days, so you'll be able to submit elsewhere if we say no. asserted
we → have → days
Please submit an anonymized draft, together with at https://freespeechlaw.scholasticahq.com/. A few guidelines: - Instead of a cover letter, please submit at most one page (and preferably just a paragraph or two) explaining how your article is novel. asserted
article → submit → page
If there is a particular way of showing that (e.g., it's the first article to discuss how case X and doctrine Y interact), please let us know. asserted
us → be → that
- Please make sure that the Introduction quickly and clearly explains the main claims you are making. uncertain
you → make → claims
We prefer articles that get right down to the novel material (if necessary, quickly explaining the necessary legal principles as they go). asserted
they → prefer → principles
- Like everyone else, we like simple, clear, engaging writing. - We are open to student-written work, and we evaluate it under the same standards applicable to work written by others. asserted
we → like → others
We publish: - Articles that say something we don't already know. - Articles with all sorts of approaches: doctrinal, theoretical, historical, empirical, or otherwise. - Articles dealing with speech, press, assembly, petition, or expression more broadly. - Generally not articles purely focused on the Free Exercise Clause or Establishment Clause, except if they also substantially discuss religious speech. asserted
they → publish → speech
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support