Photo via New York Post

Long Island lawmakers grill Flock Safety reps over ‘Big Brother’ surveillance network

Read the original at New York Post ↗
Cite

Cruz, B. (2026, October 13). Long Island lawmakers grill Flock Safety reps over ‘Big Brother’ surveillance network. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2026/10/13/us-news/long-island-lawmakers-grill-flock-safety-reps-over-big-brother-surveillance-network/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

New York Post · collected 2026-10-13 · by Brandon Cruz

Quick Summary

During a public safety meeting in Suffolk County last Thursday, lawmakers from both parties questioned representatives of surveillance tech firm Flock Safety about their AI-powered license plate-reading cameras. The lawmakers criticized the system for potentially violating privacy rights, with Republican Anthony Piccirillo pointing out that a federal judge recently ruled such searches unconstitutional due to "indiscriminate mass surveillance." Despite Flock’s claim that 99% of courts have upheld its technology as constitutional, representatives admitted their system can track individuals’ movements over time. Suffolk County keeps driver data for 30 days—23 days longer than the company's default setting—and lawmakers are now drafting stricter regulations on police use of this technology.
Written by AI on 2026-10-13, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

On October 6, 2026, Suffolk County legislators from both sides of the aisle questioned representatives from Flock Safety for over two hours during a public safety meeting. The lawmakers criticized Flock Safety's AI-powered license plate-reading cameras, which they likened to "Big Brother" surveillance technology. Republican legislator Anthony Piccirillo, the presiding officer, was particularly vocal, challenging Flock’s claim that 99% of courts have upheld the constitutionality of their system. He pointed out a recent federal judge's ruling in Oklahoma stating that warrantless searches using Flock’s cameras violated the Fourth Amendment by engaging in “indiscriminate mass surveillance.” Piccirillo predicted that other courts would eventually rule similarly against Flock Safety.

Written for “Surveillance Network Controversy” on 2026-11-04, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Surveillance Network Controversy
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
13
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
0%
0 of 13 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
66/100
New York Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-13 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

New York Post · 16821 article(s) · 36 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 36 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Brandon Cruz
39 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 “[In] 15 years later yall are gonna hear ghostbusters and go ‘awww this is our wedding song,’” one commenter predicted.
🔮 Blakeman said he hopes his sweeping last-ditch effort will get disgruntled New Yorkers who are considering sitting out of the race to vote for him on Election Day.
🔮 “Our data doesn’t reveal their size, but the sheer quantity of the material says that we can’t discount the possibility that there may be giant eels in Loch Ness,” geneticist Neil Gemmell said at the time, according to People magazine.
🔮 A team of physicists recently trapped a single antimatter particle for months — a delicate feat where one wrong move could’ve blown up their lab, according to new research.
🔮 If the request is granted, Liberty Water’s rate hike could cost residents an extra roughly $30 per month, or more than $360 a year, according to estimates by the town.
🔮 Trevor Chandler, the firm’s senior director of public affairs, made the stunning revelation during a presentation earlier this month to a group of Suffolk County pols and conceded the cameras can help “reconstruct” people’s movements, which would include under circumstances involving abortion.
🔮 “For nearly fifty years, students lived, learned and prayed on this property — UAMA seeks to open those doors again — the faith of the students may change, [but] the law’s protection must remain constant,” said attorney Muhammad Faridi, who is representing the group.
🔮 After his stroke last year, some thought he would begin to take a step back from his duties — but instead, he kept pushing forward for the children that serve as his inspiration.
🔮 Many will fry, but only one will be crowned Long Island’s Wing King.
🔮 He took the possible haunting seriously and contacted the city historian to investigate possible tragedies that might have happened at the site.
Also by Brandon Cruz
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 39 articles by Brandon Cruz →

Topics

Flock Flock Safety’s Republican Suffolk County the Fourth Amendment

Subjects

Flock ORG · 5× Flock Safety’s ORG · 3× Piccirillo PERSON · 3× Chandler GPE · 2× Republican NORP · 2× Suffolk GPE · 2× Suffolk County GPE · 2× Anthony Piccirillo PERSON · 1× Flock Safety ORG · 1× Long Island GPE · 1×

Narrative

Suffolk County legislators from both sides of the aisle grilled the company’s reps for more than two hours during last Thursday’s public safety meeting over what lawmakers blasted as Flock Safety’s sprawling network of AI-powered plate-reading cameras logging innocent drivers’ movements.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-13
🔮 The Republican pol argued that other courts will “eventually catch up” as he pressed the Flock reps about the tech’s capabilities.

Claims (13 extracted, 0 hedged)

Long Island lawmakers put Flock Safety reps on the hot seat last week over the controversial surveillance network, comparing the system to “Big Brother” and slamming the company’s defense that “99%” of courts found the cameras constitutional. asserted
cameras → put → courts
Suffolk County legislators from both sides of the aisle grilled the company’s reps for more than two hours during last Thursday’s public safety meeting over what lawmakers blasted as Flock Safety’s sprawling network of AI-powered plate-reading cameras logging innocent drivers’ movements. asserted
lawmakers → grill → movements
In one particularly fiery exchange, Republican Anthony Piccirillo snapped “99% of courts upheld Jim Crow laws for 56 years” after Flock Safety’s Senior Director of Public Affairs Trevor Chandler argued that “99% of courts” have found the tech doesn’t violate the Fourth Amendment. asserted
tech → snap → Amendment
Piccirillo, the presiding officer, noted that a federal judge in Oklahoma ruled last week that a warrantless police search using Flock’s system amounted to “indiscriminate mass surveillance,” and violated the Fourth Amendment. asserted
search → preside → Amendment
The Republican pol argued that other courts will “eventually catch up” as he pressed the Flock reps about the tech’s capabilities. asserted
he → argue → capabilities
“Isn’t it true you’ve effectively built a nationwide surveillance network capable of reconstructing an individual’s movements over time?” Piccirillo asked the reps, who skipped last month’s meeting despite being called to testify. asserted
who → build → meeting
Chandler and his colleague Joe Rosenberg, who is in charge of Flock’s account with Suffolk County, tried to dodge the question before conceding the tech has those capabilities. asserted
tech → try → capabilities
Piccirillo also blasted Flock CEO Garrett Langley for previously calling the company’s critics “terrorists,” and condescendingly asked whether the reps considered Legis. Chad Lennon, an Afghanistan war veteran and purple heart Purple Heart recipient, a terrorist. asserted
reps → blast → Legis
Other lawmakers also piled on their issues with the tech’s capabilities and lack of safeguards surrounding driver data and how it is utilized. asserted
it → pile → data
Flock safety’s controversial AI-powered cameras scan and store info on every single vehicle that drives past, including license plates and distinct features such as dents, bumper stickers, roof racks, and more. asserted
that → power → dents
Chandler also revealed that Suffolk keeps driver data for 30 days, which is 23 days longer than the company’s seven-day default, which can then be used to help police map a vehicle’s movements. asserted
police → reveal → movements
Most Suffolk lawmakers did not appear satisfied with Flock Safety’s answers regarding usage and oversight, and declared there must be better guardrails, oversight and transparency around law enforcement’s use of the technology. asserted
lawmakers → appear → technology
Legis. Greg Doroski, a Democrat, revealed at the meeting the legislature is now working with the county police department on a “very strict” new local law regulating police searches and Flock data, while also holding the company liable. asserted
company → reveal → searches
💬Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

🕘History 🎫Support