Photo via The Free Press

How to Prevent the Next 9/11

Read the original at The Free Press ↗
Cite

Barr, W. P. (2026, September 11). How to Prevent the Next 9/11. The Free Press. https://www.thefp.com/p/prevent-the-next-911-radical-islam-fisa-surveillance-bill-barr-michael-mukasey

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

The Free Press · collected 2026-09-11 · by William P. Barr

Quick Summary

The article discusses the prevention of terrorist attacks on US soil since 9/11, highlighting that while the government has implemented reforms and successfully thwarted many plots, Congress is now considering legislation that would limit the tools used to combat terrorism. The key numbers mentioned are 25 years, referring to the time since 9/11, and September 11 itself. The article takes a critical angle, warning that removing essential anti-terrorism measures could leave the country vulnerable to future attacks.
Written by AI on 2026-09-11, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

On the 25th anniversary of the September 11 attacks, New York City's first Muslim mayor, Zohran Mamdani, faces controversy over his decision to attend memorial events despite calls from some victims' families and former Mayor Rudy Giuliani for him to stay away. Mamdani, who lost an older brother in the attacks, insists on honoring those affected by reading out names at Ground Zero. Meanwhile, nearly 110,000 signatures have been collected through a petition urging Mamdani not to attend, citing concerns over his past associations and appointments that some see as conflicting with the solemnity of the event. Despite this opposition, Mamdani is moving forward with plans to release more than 170,000 pages of documents related to air quality around Ground Zero in the months following 9/11, aiming to provide transparency on what the city knew about toxic conditions and how they handled it.

Written for “9/11 Memorial Controversies” on 2026-10-30, grounded in this article and the 169 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 9/11 Memorial Controversies
Politics · 170 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly right and hedges 0% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
New York Post
Hedges 7 of 79 claims Outlet record 66/100
CBS News
Hedges 2 of 72 claims Outlet record 66/100
CBS News
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 1 of 20 claims Outlet record 66/100
CBS News
Hedges 0 of 1 claims Outlet record 66/100
Zeteo
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 0 of 7 claims
The Straits Times
Hedges 3 of 27 claims Outlet record 66/100
The Independent
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 4 of 48 claims Outlet record 59/100
Toronto Star
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 2 of 53 claims Outlet record 64/100
The Guardian
Hedges 5 of 164 claims Outlet record 66/100
The Globe and Mail
Hedges 1 of 49 claims Outlet record 52/100
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
15
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
0%
0 of 15 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
96/100
The Free Press's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
170
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-11 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Free Press · 401 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

William P. Barr
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 And while monuments to the nation’s security and prosperity were reduced to rubble on television screens, Americans wondered, “Where will the next attack occur?”
2026-09-11 · assertive framing · How to Prevent the Next 9/11
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

American Americans FBI The September 11 attacks the Geneva Conventions

Subjects

FBI ORG · 3× American NORP · 1× Americans NORP · 1× Congress ORG · 1× ISIS ORG · 1× Lockerbie GPE · 1× U.S. GPE · 1× Western NORP · 1× al-Qaeda ORG · 1× the United States GPE · 1×

Narrative

And from the burned-out remnant of a vehicle parked beneath the World Trade Center when it was attacked in 1993, the FBI was able to identify the individuals who were responsible for the blast and uncover a further plot to bomb other major New York City landmarks.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-11
🔮 And while monuments to the nation’s security and prosperity were reduced to rubble on television screens, Americans wondered, “Where will the next attack occur?”
2026-09-11 · The Free Press
How to Prevent the Next 9/11 · assertive framing

Claims (15 extracted, 0 hedged)

In a matter of moments, thousands of people were incinerated against a bright blue sky. asserted
thousands → incinerate → sky
Passengers on a commercial flight became heroes, phoning hasty goodbyes to their loved ones before making an awesome sacrifice. asserted
Passengers → become → sacrifice
And while monuments to the nation’s security and prosperity were reduced to rubble on television screens, Americans wondered, “Where will the next attack occur?” asserted
attack → reduce → screens
Answering that question has been a singular preoccupation of federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies since the attacks. asserted
Answering → answer → attacks
It has required legal and institutional reforms, moral clarity, political courage and, above all, a clear-eyed vision of the nature of the threat. asserted
It → require → threat
The September 11 attacks were not merely criminal acts; they were acts of war, whose terms, targets, and rules of engagement were dictated not by the Geneva Conventions but by jihadists dedicated to the destruction of Western civilization. asserted
terms → dictate → civilization
In the wake of 9/11, the federal government implemented sweeping reforms in an effort to prevent an attack of that scale from ever happening again on U.S. soil. asserted
government → implement → soil
Now, a quarter-century later, we can look back with some satisfaction that September 11 was not a prelude to a blitz, and that many other attacks have been thwarted. asserted
attacks → look → blitz
But acknowledging our nation’s success in preventing another major terror attack does not mean that the job is finished. asserted
job → acknowledge → attack
Our enemies are still out there, still preparing for the next strike. asserted
enemies → prepare → strike
And yet Congress is now taking away some of the essential tools we have used to foil attacks by al-Qaeda, ISIS, and similar groups over the last 25 years. asserted
we → take → years
Until September 11, the United States had dealt with terrorist attacks mainly as criminal law enforcement matters. asserted
States → deal → matters
From the 1988 bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland, to the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center, the FBI has worked with local law enforcement partners to build successful counterterrorism cases out of little more than charred fragments. asserted
FBI → work → fragments
Starting with shreds of a clothing label and a thumbnail-sized piece of plastic explosive recovered from the Scottish countryside, the FBI was able to trace the Pan Am bombing to two Libyan intelligence officers. asserted
FBI → start → officers
And from the burned-out remnant of a vehicle parked beneath the World Trade Center when it was attacked in 1993, the FBI was able to identify the individuals who were responsible for the blast and uncover a further plot to bomb other major New York City landmarks. asserted
who → burn → landmarks
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support