Photo via Daily Mail

Harry and Meghan are set to cash in on their royal connections like never before. They seem to think we're all stupid - but their 'cunning' plan will never work: AMANDA PLATELL

Read the original at Daily Mail ↗
Cite

Platell, A. (2026, October 14). Harry and Meghan are set to cash in on their royal connections like never before. They seem to think we're all stupid - but their 'cunning' plan will never work: AMANDA PLATELL. Daily Mail. https://www.dailymail.com/news/royals/article-16205061/Harry-Meghan-royal-connections-Nottingham-AMANDA-PLATELL.html?ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490&ito=1490

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Daily Mail · collected 2026-10-14 · by Amanda Platell

Quick Summary

Amanda Platell critiques Harry and Meghan's upcoming visit to Nottingham as a strategic attempt to regain public favor after their departure from official royal duties. She questions whether this choice of location, significant for their initial appearance as an engaged couple nine years ago, is coincidental or calculated to capitalize on nostalgia. Platell argues that despite the warm reception they once received, their recent actions have alienated the British public and suggests it will be difficult for them to regain their former status due to perceived mistreatment of the Royal Family and controversial media appearances.
Written by AI on 2026-10-14, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Harry and Meghan returned to Nottingham on October 15, 2026, for their first joint public appearance since moving back to Britain in August. The visit included stops at three charities: the Community Recording Studio, Hubb Community Kitchen, and Epic Partners. Despite King Charles announcing last month that Harry and Meghan are "private citizens with commercial and charitable interests," their tour resembled an official royal engagement.

Local news website Nottingham Live published a detailed itinerary of the couple's tour in advance, which is unusual for security reasons. During the visit, police had to intervene when crowds blocked their car at Epic Partners, highlighting concerns over public safety and security measures for private citizens with high-profile events.

Critics like Kinsey Schofield from YouTube’s "Kinsey Schofield Unfiltered" argue that Harry and Meghan are trying to recreate royal optics without responsibilities. Rebecca English suggests the couple may have intentionally released the itinerary to provoke a security incident, potentially influencing decisions on taxpayer-funded protection. The visit was marked by mixed reactions, with some welcoming their return while others criticized the media frenzy and lack of privacy for the Sussexes.

Written for “Harry And Meghan's Joint Engagements UK Return” on 2026-11-04, grounded in this article and the 28 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Harry And Meghan's Joint Engagements UK Return
Entertainment · 29 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 14% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Toronto Star
Hedges 4 of 82 claims Outlet record 64/100
The Independent
Hedges 2 of 22 claims Outlet record 59/100
The Straits Times
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 0 of 16 claims Outlet record 66/100
New York Post
Hedges 0 of 16 claims Outlet record 66/100
The Straits Times
Hedges 1 of 11 claims Outlet record 66/100
Evening Standard
Hedges 0 of 20 claims Outlet record 64/100
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
28
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
14%
4 of 28 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
69/100
Daily Mail's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
29
Entertainment
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-14 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Daily Mail · 9314 article(s) · 22 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 22 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Amanda Platell
3 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 In a thought-provoking piece yesterday, my colleague Richard Kay posed the question many have been asking in recent days: Could the scandal over sexual abuse allegations against Meghan’s father, Thomas Markle Sr, generate a groundswell of support for the duchess?
🔮 Could it be that the ‘devoted’ Dad who raised her after her mother left, had a darker side?
🔮 Truly, it must have been a wonderfully happy time for the couple - the sea of Union Jacks was so dense you could hardly see the pair of them.
Also by Amanda Platell
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

British Britons Nottingham the Royal Family the United Kingdom

Subjects

Meghan PERSON · 6× Nottingham GPE · 5× Harry PERSON · 4× Britons NORP · 2× Chamberlain PERSON · 2× the Royal Family ORG · 2× the United Kingdom GPE · 2× Amanda Platell PERSON · 1× Australia GPE · 1× British NORP · 1×

Narrative

By reprising their first triumphant appearance in Nottingham they seem desperate to go back to the old days, to suggest that we should let bygones be bygones. But too much has happened since then - too much that we simply cannot forgive - not least that terrible slur they made that senior members of the Royal Family were racist.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-14
🔮 Truly, it must have been a wonderfully happy time for the couple - the sea of Union Jacks was so dense you could hardly see the pair of them.

Claims (28 extracted, 4 hedged)

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are limbering up for their first public engagement together since coming back to the UK. asserted
Duke → limber → UK
They have chosen to go this week to Nottingham, which happens to be where they went as a couple for the first time after announcing their engagement in 2017. asserted
they → choose → 2017
What a difference nine years make. asserted
years → make → difference
He’s lost his hair, they’ve both lost the affection of the British people and neither of them are working royals any longer. asserted
neither → lose → them
So why have they chosen to go back to Nottingham where they appeared as the loved-up couple we adored all those years ago? asserted
we → choose → couple
Are they trying to fly in the face of the King’s very public declaration last month, in a letter sent by the Lord Chamberlain, that they remain ‘private citizens’ rather than working royals, and seeking to re-establish themselves in our hearts? asserted
they → try → hearts
Is it an indication that, following their recent tours of Australia and other nations where they were treated like royalty, the country where they really want to regain their royal status is the United Kingdom? asserted
they → follow → status
Looking back at pictures of that initial appearance together, she proudly wearing her new engagement ring, it is clear that they were received rapturously by an army of Britons desperate for a glimpse, or if possible a hug - and Meghan provided them in abundance. asserted
Meghan → look → abundance
Truly, it must have been a wonderfully happy time for the couple - the sea of Union Jacks was so dense you could hardly see the pair of them. uncertain
you → see → them
Harry and Meghan visit Nottingham on their first official public event together in 2017, two months after announcing their engagement Amanda Platell asks: 'Is this an indication that the country where they really want to regain their royal status is the United Kingdom?' asserted
they → visit → status
You can hardly blame them for trying to revisit it. But that was then and this is now. asserted
this → blame → it
As Harry will be only too aware after being booed when he appeared in the stands at a Leicester Tigers rugby match last week. asserted
he → boo → match
It was a response that showed him and Meghan just how far this once-adored couple have sunk in our hearts. asserted
couple → show → hearts
We don’t need the polls of the Sussexes’ disapproval rating (around 68 per cent, since you ask) to tell us that they are not much welcome here after the way they have treated the Royal Family. asserted
they → need → Family
Britons were universally appalled by the way they milked and abused their royal status through his autobiography Spare, the Oprah interview and the Netflix docuseries. asserted
they → appal → autobiography
Making millions by trashing the royals was deeply unpalatable and still sticks in our craw. asserted
Making → make → craw
Now they want to be welcomed back by us. asserted
they → want → us
By reprising their first triumphant appearance in Nottingham they seem desperate to go back to the old days, to suggest that we should let bygones be bygones. But too much has happened since then - too much that we simply cannot forgive - not least that terrible slur they made that senior members of the Royal Family were racist. asserted
members → reprise → Family
Which brings us to the question of what, exactly, they think their role will be in Britain now they have returned. asserted
they → bring → Britain
Their Nottingham appearance this week is expected to follow a format that’s strikingly similar to that of their original trip, with visits to charities and all the razzmatazz of a royal tour. asserted
that → expect → tour
It follows Meghan’s very public ‘private’ tea last week with Nobel Prize-winning campaigner Malala Yousafzai with whom she was pictured at the front entrance of Claridge’s Hotel in central London and whose charity, the Duchess let it be known, she would be supporting. asserted
she → follow → charity
Harry’s grandmother the late Queen declared that when he and Meghan decided to leave the royal fold they could not be half-in and half-out. uncertain
they → declare → fold
With that letter from the Lord Chamberlain, the King reiterated that they cannot be considered working royals. asserted
they → reiterate → Chamberlain
Yet they give every appearance of wanting to be just that while they continue to cash-in - Meghan reportedly plans to sell her As Ever products in the UK, while Harry was reportedly paid $100,000 for making a speech on mental health. uncertain
Harry → give → health
To my mind they seem cynically determined to ignore the late Queen’s diktat, and planning to exploit their royal connections literally for all they are worth. asserted
they → seem → all
They may think it’s a cunning plan. uncertain
it → think → ?
But it won’t work. asserted
it → work → ?
If they continue in this vein, those boos for Harry in a rugby ground will soon be heard around the country. asserted
boos → continue → country
💬Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

🕘History 🎫Support