A Sydney-based currency trader was fired after his employer discovered that he was working from a hotel in Singapore while claiming to be working from home in Australia.
asserted
he → base → Australia
Although a workplace tribunal found that Charles Graham had deliberately concealed his location and that the company had valid grounds to dismiss him, it also ruled that his employer failed to follow the proper procedure.
asserted
employer → find → procedure
Graham won an unfair dismissal case on October 7 but received only four weeks’ pay in lieu of notice, without reinstatement or additional compensation.
asserted
Graham → win → reinstatement
The Fair Work Commission found that Graham had knowingly violated his employer’s policies by concealing his location.
asserted
Graham → find → location
His employer, HIFX Australia, which operates under the trading name Xe, dismissed him on December 2, 2025, after tracing his work laptop to a hotel in Singapore on November 17, when he was supposed to be working from home in Sydney.
asserted
he → operate → Sydney
This was not the first time Graham had stretched the boundaries of remote work.
asserted
Graham → stretch → work
He had previously worked from Bali while telling his manager that he needed to stay home for a plumber who was fixing recurring bathroom problems.
asserted
who → work → problems
In September 2025, Graham had asked Xe for permission to work from Singapore for a year.
asserted
Graham → ask → year
The company rejected the request, explaining that his position was based in Sydney and it did not have a licence to operate in Singapore.
asserted
it → reject → Singapore
Graham worked from home for several weeks, citing an eye injury, before taking annual leave for a holiday.
asserted
Graham → work → holiday
He was expected to return to work in November.
asserted
He → expect → November
On November 17, his first day back after the holiday, his manager, Abigail Plummer, contacted the IT department to investigate his whereabouts.
asserted
manager → contact → whereabouts
“Our mate should be online today, first day since his holiday, so I will need your FBI skills,” she wrote in an email.
asserted
she → need → email
The ensuing investigation revealed that Graham was in Singapore rather than Sydney, as he had led his employer to believe.
asserted
he → ensue → employer
Graham says partner's infection deferred return to Australia
Defending his actions, Graham said his partner had developed a bacterial infection during their holiday, forcing them to postpone their return to Australia.
asserted
partner → say → Australia
He said he had intended to inform his manager about the delay but was overwhelmed by unread emails, incoming calls and a complaint from a high-value client.
asserted
he → say → client
Xe rejected his explanation, saying the documents he provided did not adequately establish that his partner was unable to travel.
asserted
partner → reject → explanation
The company also said he had failed to explain why he kept his location secret.
asserted
he → say → location
The employer cited other instances of alleged workplace misconduct.
asserted
employer → cite → misconduct
After a mandatory policy requiring employees to attend the office three days a week was introduced, Graham had reportedly arrived late on several occasions, claiming he was unwell or occupied with household chores.
uncertain
he → require → chores
Fair Work Commission commissioner Alana Matheson ruled that Graham’s concealment of his whereabouts demonstrated that he understood he needed approval to work overseas.
asserted
he → rule → approval
She described his failure to disclose that he was in Singapore as deliberate dishonesty and agreed that Xe had a valid reason to dismiss him.
asserted
Xe → describe → him
However, the commission also identified shortcomings in the company’s handling of the dismissal.
asserted
commission → identify → dismissal
Internal messages discussing a “strategy” and suggesting that Graham should be given “a bit of hope to turn up to the meeting” raised concerns that the outcome might have been decided before he had been given a proper opportunity to respond.
uncertain
he → discuss → opportunity
Matheson found that the company had failed to fully explain the case against Graham and give him an adequate opportunity to defend himself.
asserted
company → find → himself
The company’s failure to follow due process meant that the dismissal was unfair, despite the valid grounds for terminating his employment.
asserted
dismissal → follow → employment
The Aporia
