Photo via New York Post

Sotomayor, Gorsuch blast illegal immigrant’s prosecution as ‘constitutional absurdity’

Read the original at New York Post ↗
Cite

Goelz, A. (2026, October 14). Sotomayor, Gorsuch blast illegal immigrant’s prosecution as ‘constitutional absurdity’. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2026/10/14/us-news/why-sonia-sotomayor-neil-gorsuch-blasted-an-illegal-immigrants-prosecution-as-a-constitutional-absurdity/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

New York Post · collected 2026-10-14 · by Ally Goelz

Quick Summary

Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Neil Gorsuch criticized the prosecution of Jesus Herrera-Salazar as a violation of constitutional protections against double jeopardy. In 2020, Herrera-Salazar was arrested, pleaded guilty to illegally re-entering the US after deportation, served time, and then faced another indictment for the same offense following a traffic stop in Oklahoma. Sotomayor and Gorsuch argued that this situation presents a constitutional absurdity, noting that Herrera-Salazar’s circumstances created a "Hobson’s choice," where he could not legally avoid prosecution regardless of his actions. They urged courts to recognize that continuous criminal conduct should not allow for multiple prosecutions based on different time markers.
Written by AI on 2026-10-14, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Supreme Court Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Neil Gorsuch teamed up on October 13 to criticize what they called a "constitutional absurdity" involving Jesus Herrera-Salazar, a Mexican national. The justices released a joint statement after the Supreme Court declined to hear Herrera-Salazar’s appeal, noting that he had already been deported following his second conviction for illegally entering the United States.

Herrera-Salazar was initially arrested in 2020 and pleaded guilty to being "found in" the U.S. after illegal entry; he served 15 months in prison before being released under supervision in Oklahoma. While on supervised release, Herrera-Salazar was again arrested during a traffic stop and re-indicted for the same offense, leading to an additional sentence of 21 months.

Sotomayor and Gorsuch expressed concern that such circumstances could violate the Double Jeopardy Clause, which prevents multiple prosecutions for the same crime. They encouraged courts to "avoid the constitutional absurdity" in future cases like Herrera-Salazar's and emphasized his dilemma: staying in Oklahoma or leaving the country to avoid re-arrest.

Written for “Sotomayor And Gorsuch Alliance” on 2026-11-04, grounded in this article and the 2 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Sotomayor And Gorsuch Alliance
Politics · 3 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 9% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Washington Examiner
Hedges 1 of 14 claims Outlet record 69/100
Fox News
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 3 of 31 claims Outlet record 68/100
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
11
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
9%
1 of 11 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
66/100
New York Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
3
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-14 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

New York Post · 16794 article(s) · 36 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 36 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Ally Goelz
31 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Flanagan, Minnesota’s lieutenant governor, will become the first Native American woman elected to the upper chamber.
🔮 The 2026 midterm elections will feature 36 gubernatorial races, with voters determining which party will shape the political direction of most states across the country.
🔮 “Democrats should understand that the allegation is almost certainly true — whatever conclusions they draw from that point could vary — and her denials calling it a right-wing, Islamophobic or racist conspiracy are almost certainly not,” Radinovich wrote.
🔮 National GOP operatives now fear the fallout could threaten the Senate re-election campaign of Republican Jon Husted in a state Trump won by 11 percentage points two years ago.
🔮 News of the search warrant, whether properly predicated or not, could affect voters’ decisions, which is exactly why federal law enforcement should not engage in such conduct when voters are casting their ballots.
🔮 But residents are worried that those who would want to return to Ukrainian-controlled areas could instead be taken to Russia or occupied Crimea.
🔮 The White House initially pegged the price at $200 million, but a contractor’s estimate obtained by The Washington Post put the broader project’s cost at $600 million, a substantial portion expected to come from taxpayers — despite Trump previously saying private donors would cover the ballroom.
🔮 Rep. Ilhan Omar insisted she’ll keep voting in Minnesota as federal investigators probe her immigration history, brushing off questions about whether the investigation could threaten her US citizenship.
🔮 Vice President JD Vance revealed “there’s a chance” he won’t run for president in 2028 — and second lady Usha and the couple’s four young kids could help make the decision for him.
🔮 Rogers said Sunday that he would have voted for the bipartisan sanctions legislation that Trump is now declining to enforce, arguing that the administration needs to do more to bring down soaring diesel prices hitting Michigan residents. “I would have voted for the sanctions bill on Russia,” Rogers said during a CNN State of the Union appearance with Dana Bash.
Also by Ally Goelz
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 31 articles by Ally Goelz →

Topics

Mexico Oklahoma the Double Jeopardy Clause the Eastern District the United States

Subjects

Herrera-Salazar PERSON · 6× Gorsuch PERSON · 3× Sotomayor PERSON · 3× the United States GPE · 3× Oklahoma GPE · 2× Denver GPE · 1× Hobson PERSON · 1× Jesus Herrera-Salazar’s PERSON · 1× Mexico GPE · 1× the Eastern District GPE · 1×

Narrative

“Should circumstances like these arise again, I encourage courts to avoid the constitutional absurdity that occurred here and give the Double Jeopardy Clause its full weight and meaning,” Sotomayor wrote in a brief opinion joined by Gorsuch, adding that the circumstances of the case left Herrera-Salazar facing a “Hobson’s choice.”
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-14
🔮 The high court rejected Jesus Herrera-Salazar’s request to review his case, in part because he has already been deported, but Sotomayor and Gorsuch made clear they “hope the facts of this case are anomolous.”

Claims (11 extracted, 1 hedged)

The high court rejected Jesus Herrera-Salazar’s request to review his case, in part because he has already been deported, but Sotomayor and Gorsuch made clear they “hope the facts of this case are anomolous.” asserted
facts → reject → case
Herrera-Salazar was initially arrested in 2020, pleaded guilty to illegally re-entering the US following removal, and spent some time in prison before being placed on supervised release. asserted
Salazar → arrest → release
While Herrera-Salazar was required to remain in the US, he was arrested after a traffic stop in Oklahoma and indicted and convicted for the same offense. asserted
he → require → offense
“Should circumstances like these arise again, I encourage courts to avoid the constitutional absurdity that occurred here and give the Double Jeopardy Clause its full weight and meaning,” Sotomayor wrote in a brief opinion joined by Gorsuch, adding that the circumstances of the case left Herrera-Salazar facing a “Hobson’s choice.” asserted
circumstances → arise → choice
“In the Government’s eyes, whether Herrera-Salazar remained in the Eastern District of Oklahoma or left the United States [after his first release from prison], he would be breaking the law,” the justices explained. asserted
justices → remain → law
“While Herrera-Salazar was caught in this bind, the Government prosecuted and punished him yet again for being ‘found in’ the United States, even though all agree he was forbidden to leave the United States.” asserted
he → catch → States
After serving both sentences, Herrera-Salazar was deported to Mexico in 2024, according to court documents. uncertain
Salazar → serve → documents
His attorneys had argued that the second prosecution violated his Fifth Amendment right not to be tried twice for the same offense. asserted
prosecution → argue → offense
But the Denver-based 10th US Circuit Court of Appeals rejected that argument, finding that the two convictions involved separate offenses. asserted
convictions → base → offenses
Sotomayor and Gorsuch disagreed with the lower court’s reasoning, warning that the government should not be able to prosecute someone twice for the same continuous criminal conduct. asserted
government → disagree → conduct
“[O]ur precedents and the logic of the Double Jeopardy Clause,” they wrote, “strongly suggest that the Government is barred from charging that defendant with the same continuous crime for a second time simply by focusing on a different time marker.” asserted
Government → write → marker
💬Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

🕘History 🎫Support