Photo via Toronto Star

At Toronto event, Margaret Atwood reiterates need for due process in Galloway case

Read the original at Toronto Star ↗
Cite

Mohsen, S. (2026, October 16). At Toronto event, Margaret Atwood reiterates need for due process in Galloway case. Toronto Star. https://www.thestar.com/news/ontario/at-toronto-event-margaret-atwood-reiterates-need-for-due-process-in-galloway-case/article_e2865efc-43de-59b6-af48-c72d95c2f54e.html

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Toronto Star · collected 2026-10-16 · by Sadeen Mohsen

Quick Summary

Margaret Atwood addressed the need for due process during Steven Galloway's defamation trial at a Journalists for Human Rights event in Toronto. Atwood was receiving an award when she discussed her support for an open letter from November 2016 that advocated for an investigation into how UBC managed the Galloway case.
Written by AI on 2026-10-16, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

At a Journalists for Human Rights event in Toronto on October 16, 2026, author Margaret Atwood reiterated her support for due process in the case of Steven Galloway, who is currently undergoing a defamation trial in Vancouver. Speaking while receiving an award, Atwood criticized media coverage of the incident that led to Galloway's firing from the University of British Columbia (UBC) eight years prior. She called on journalists to "search deep within your hearts" regarding their adherence to Article 10 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which guarantees a fair trial. Atwood also humorously noted her own stability in the face of criticism compared to Galloway's experience, saying, “Luckily, I couldn’t be fired from a university, blacklisted from festivals, or if I was, I’d have noticed.”

Written for “Margaret Atwood On Galloway Case” on 2026-11-03, grounded in this article and the 1 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Margaret Atwood On Galloway Case
Entertainment · 2 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 0% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Globe and Mail
Hedges 2 of 24 claims Outlet record 52/100
“The articles describe different events, one being Steven Galloway's testimony in his defamation trial in Vancouver and the other Margaret Atwood speaking about due process at an event in Toronto.”
The Globe and Mail
Hedges 2 of 22 claims Outlet record 52/100
“The articles discuss related events but refer to different specific occurrences: one about Steven Galloway's testimony in his defamation trial and another about Margaret Atwood reiterating her stance at an event in Toronto.”
National Post
Hedges 3 of 28 claims Outlet record 60/100
CBC News
Hedges 1 of 8 claims Outlet record 74/100
“The articles describe different aspects of related events: one focuses on Margaret Atwood's comments at an event in Toronto regarding Steven Galloway's case, while the other covers Galloway finishing his testimony in his defamation trial in Vancouver.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
2
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
0%
0 of 2 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
64/100
Toronto Star's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
2
Entertainment
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-16 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Toronto Star · 11297 article(s) · 28 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 28 correction(s)
2026-10-26
Correction
2026-10-24
Correction
2026-10-07
Correction
2026-09-24
Correction

Who wrote this

Sadeen Mohsen
10 article(s) here · 0 carrying a prediction
🔮 Demkiw says officers were following evidence in the case as fast as they could under the circumstances.
🔮 “The remainder of which will come subsequent in the next construction cycle.”
🔮 “The remainder of which will come subsequent in the next construction cycle.”
🔮 They said 17 such incidents took place between May and December 2024.
🔮 Eric Apps had an inkling of who would get his vote in Toronto’s municipal election, but the lawyer wanted a second opinion before making his final decision.
Also by Sadeen Mohsen
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 10 articles by Sadeen Mohsen →

Topics

Journalists for Human Rights TORONTO Vancouver the University of British Columbia

Subjects

TORONTO GPE · 2× Atwood PERSON · 1× Galloway PERSON · 1× Journalists for Human Rights ORG · 1× Margaret Atwood PERSON · 1× Steven Galloway PERSON · 1× Vancouver GPE · 1× the University of British Columbia ORG · 1×

Narrative

Atwood, who was receiving an award at a Journalists for Human Rights event, spoke about her decision to sign an open letter in November 2016 calling for an investigation into how the University of British Columbia handled the Galloway case.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-16

Claims (2 extracted, 0 hedged)

As Steven Galloway concluded his testimony in his defamation trial in Vancouver, in Toronto, author Margaret Atwood reiterated her stance as a defender of due process in his case. asserted
Atwood → conclude → case
Atwood, who was receiving an award at a Journalists for Human Rights event, spoke about her decision to sign an open letter in November 2016 calling for an investigation into how the University of British Columbia handled the Galloway case. asserted
University → receive → case
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support