FO says no formal Russian mediation initiative currently under discussion
• Warns India that any future aggression will be met with a stronger response
asserted
aggression → say → response
The Foreign Office on Friday said that talks with Afghanistan could not be unconditional, while rejecting suggestions that Islamabad was unwilling to engage with its neighbour and saying it would welcome sincere efforts by friendly countries to help resolve the dispute.
uncertain
it → say → dispute
“Pakistan is not shying away from discussions or dialogue, including with representatives of Afghanistan.
asserted
Pakistan → shy → Afghanistan
Pakistan would welcome any sincere efforts by friendly countries that could help address our legitimate security concerns and promoting regional peace and stability,” Foreign Office spokesperson Sajjad Haider Khan said at the weekly media briefing.
uncertain
Khan → welcome → briefing
The statement came as Russia recently renewed its readiness to mediate between the two countries, although Islamabad denied the existence of any such initiative.
“At present, I am not aware of any separate, formal Russian mediation initiative being under discussion,” Mr Khan said, adding that Pakistan remained open to engagement that produced tangible results.
asserted
that → come → results
Russia, the only country to have formally recognised the Taliban government, has recently renewed its offer to facilitate a settlement if both sides request its involvement.
asserted
sides → recognise → involvement
Moscow’s special envoy for Afghanistan, Zamir Kabulov, had earlier this month made this suggestion after the latest round of the Moscow Format consultations on Oct 5 ended without a joint communiqué because of differences between Pakistan and the Afghan Taliban delegations over references to terrorist networks operating from Afghanistan.
asserted
round → make → Afghanistan
Mr Khan said the absence of an agreed statement at the Moscow Format meeting reflected the Afghan delegation’s unwillingness to accept language on terrorist networks that had been agreed in the previous year’s document.
asserted
that → say → document
“The fact that no joint communiqué was issued after the Moscow Format is self-evident that Afghanistan did not accept the formulation which had been acceptable until last year particularly about presence of terrorist network in Afghanistan.
asserted
which → issue → Afghanistan
This shows that there is reluctance on the part of Afghanistan that terrorism is originating from its soil,” he said.
asserted
he → show → soil
The failure to get a joint communique highlighted the central obstacle to normalising relations, which is Pakistan’s demand for action against the Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and other terrorist groups it says are using Afghan territory to launch attacks across the border.
asserted
it → get → border
The Taliban authorities have avoided taking a categorical position on the TTP and other groups, while rejecting Islamabad’s allegations that Afghanistan is being used as a base for attacks against Pakistan.
asserted
Afghanistan → avoid → Pakistan
The dispute has frustrated international efforts to reduce tensions.
asserted
dispute → frustrate → tensions
Qatar and Turkiye last October helped broker a ceasefire, but subsequent round of talks failed to reach a lasting settlement.
asserted
round → help → settlement
Saudi Arabia separately hosted discussions, while China held talks between the two sides in Urumqi in April.
asserted
China → host → April
None of these efforts could resolve the disagreement over terrorist groups and the measures needed to prevent cross border attacks.
uncertain
None → resolve → attacks
Pakistan’s position, Mr Khan said, was that dialogue would need to be backed by an arrangement that could verify whether terrorist activity against the country had stopped.
uncertain
activity → say → country
Pakistan has been raising the issue of terrorism emanating from Afghanistan at different forums.
asserted
Pakistan → raise → forums
Unfortunately, the Taliban regime has been taking one step forward and one step backward,” Mr Khan emphasised.
asserted
Khan → take → ?
“Pakistan has only one demand that there should be a verifiable mechanism to ensure complete cessation of terrorist activities emanating from Afghan soil against Pakistan,” he said.
asserted
he → have → Pakistan
‘Stronger response’
Mr Khan reminded India of the response it faced during last year’s military confrontation and warned that any future aggression would be met with an even stronger response.
asserted
aggression → remind → response
FO reaction came after Indian Defence Minister Rajnath Singh a day earlier threatened a bigger strike in the event of any future terrorist attacks.
asserted
Singh → come → attacks
Singh, while speaking at National Defence Conclave 2026 in Delhi, recalled Operation Sindoor and said that it marked a decisive response to terrorism.
asserted
it → speak → terrorism
He also referred to earlier Indian military operations.
asserted
He → refer → operations
“We reject and condemn the Indian Defence Minister’s provocative remarks entailing a threat of Indian aggression against Pakistan.
asserted
We → reject → Pakistan
Such reckless statements reflect India’s hegemonistic mindset and the risks its belligerent posture poses to regional peace and stability in South Asia,” Mr Khan said.
asserted
Khan → reflect → Asia
“We wish to remind India of the consequences of its military aggression in May last year, when Pakistan demonstrated both its capability and resolve to defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity and gave a fitting reply to Indian aggression,” the FO spokesperson said.
uncertain
spokesperson → wish → aggression
Mr Khan urged New Delhi to draw lessons from the previous confrontation and avoid further escalation.
asserted
Khan → urge → escalation
“India should draw an appropriate lesson from the last year’s experience and abandon its belligerent posture and dangerous rhetoric and act with responsibility for lasting peace in the region,” he said.
asserted
he → draw → region
The Aporia
