Oklahoma Judge's Ruling Contained AI Hallucinations

Read the original at Reason ↗
Cite

Volokh, E. (2026, September 14). Oklahoma Judge's Ruling Contained AI Hallucinations. Reason. https://reason.com/volokh/2026/09/14/oklahoma-judges-ruling-contained-ai-hallucinations/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Reason · collected 2026-09-14 · by Eugene Volokh

Quick Summary

Judge Lawrence Wheeler of Stephens County, Oklahoma, admitted using OpenAI’s ChatGPT during his research and included non-existent case citations in an order he drafted. An August 17 letter from District Attorney Jason Hicks to the state attorney general's office details this incident and mentions additional allegations against Judge Wheeler, including offering to amend an order in exchange for dismissing a writ and eavesdropping on jury deliberations. However, Oklahoma’s State Attorney General Gentner Drummond reviewed these claims and decided not to pursue them further.
Written by AI on 2026-09-14, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Judge Lawrence Wheeler of the District Court of Stephens County, Oklahoma, disclosed that he used ChatGPT during research and inadvertently included non-existent case citations in an order. This revelation prompted an investigation by the Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation (OSBI). The OSBI also probed claims that Judge Wheeler offered to amend an order in exchange for a dismissal of a writ seeking relief from the Oklahoma Supreme Court and allegations he eavesdropped on jury deliberations, as detailed in a letter by prosecutor Jason Hicks to the state attorney general's office.

In response to these allegations, Attorney General Gentner Drummond reviewed the OSBI’s findings and decided not to pursue further action against Judge Wheeler. The decision was based on the absence of evidence supporting additional criminal claims beyond the initial misuse of AI-generated content.

Written for “AI Hallucinations In Court” on 2026-11-01, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 AI Hallucinations In Court
Technology · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
4
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
50%
2 of 4 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
67/100
Reason's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Technology
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-14 · source text last changed 2026-09-14 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Reason · 1046 article(s) · 4 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 4 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Eugene Volokh
174 article(s) here · 0 carrying a prediction
🔮 Because "[t]he costs and efforts required to defend a lawsuit through [discovery] could chill free speech nearly as effectively as the absence of the actual malice standard altogether[,]" a public figure plaintiff must plausibly allege actual malice at the outset of the litigation.
🔮 The First Amendment forbids a State from using its investigative power that way, and I will not allow it while this case is pending.
🔮 The same logic could apply to nuns who had felt religious pressure to do the educational or nursing work that their order was known for, or to monks who had felt religious pressure to do agricultural work that supports the monastery.
2026-10-30 · assertive framing · Amicus Brief in OneTaste Criminal Prosecution
🔮 Before doing so, "he entered the coffee shop to purchase a cookie, which he hoped would be seen as a sign of goodwill."
🔮 While individuals who are the subjects of unwanted speech may be able to limit some speech directed to them, they cannot limit offensive speech about them directed to others.
🔮 The hope would be to siphon votes away from Sullivan.
🔮 Defendants observe that Alibaba is not completely banned from appearing before the federal government—it could hire more in-house lobbyists or find a firm that is willing to forgo defense contractor clients….
🔮 Still others predicted that someone would eventually remove the context and circulate the resulting footage as though Mr. Piker had been speaking sincerely.
2026-10-27 · assertive framing · Hasan Piker Sues Scott Jennings
🔮 The Indictment alleges that Holmes posted on that account several statements against the Jewish community and Israel, including: "The jew will be destroyed and discarded," "From the river to the sea every Jew will die," "You inbred people will all die," and "Die Jew."
🔮 When reviewing whether the evidence was sufficient to support the issuance [or extension] of a 258E order, we consider [consistently with the statutory requirements] whether, "by a preponderance of the evidence, together with all permissible inferences," the judge could have found "that the defendant had committed '[three] or more acts of willful and malicious conduct aimed at a specific person committed with the intent to cause fear, intimidation, abuse or damage to property and that [did] in fact cause fear, intimidation, abuse or damage to property.'"
Also by Eugene Volokh
Open Thread
2026-10-31 · Reason
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 174 articles by Eugene Volokh →

Topics

Oklahoma OpenAI Reuters the District Court of Stephens County the Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation

Subjects

Oklahoma GPE · 2× Wheeler PERSON · 2× David Lat PERSON · 1× Jason] Hicks PERSON · 1× Lawrence Wheeler PERSON · 1× Mike Scarcella PERSON · 1× OpenAI ORG · 1× Reuters ORG · 1× the District Court of Stephens County ORG · 1× the Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation ORG · 1×

Narrative

The OSBI also looked into allegations "that Judge Wheeler offered to amend the order in exchange for a dismissal of a writ seeking relief from the Oklahoma Supreme Court" and that he "eavesdropped on jury deliberations," the DA disclosed in the letter.
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-14
2026-09-14 · Reason
Oklahoma Judge's Ruling Contained AI Hallucinations · mixed framing

Claims (4 extracted, 2 hedged)

The judge, Lawrence Wheeler of the District Court of Stephens County, told an investigator with the Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation that he used OpenAI's ChatGPT for research, and that an order he drafted contained two citations to cases that do not exist, according to an August 17 letter from a prosecutor to the state attorney general's office…. According to the August 17 letter, [DA Jason] Hicks recused himself from investigating Wheeler and asked Oklahoma State Attorney General Gentner Drummond to review the Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation's report or reassign the inquiry. uncertain
Hicks → tell → inquiry
Drummond's office in its statement on Wednesday said its criminal division "thoroughly reviewed" the claims and was not pursuing them further. uncertain
division → say → them
The initial report came in The Oklahoman (Nolan Clay); it's paywalled, but here's a brief excerpt: asserted
excerpt → come → Oklahoman
The OSBI also looked into allegations "that Judge Wheeler offered to amend the order in exchange for a dismissal of a writ seeking relief from the Oklahoma Supreme Court" and that he "eavesdropped on jury deliberations," the DA disclosed in the letter. asserted
DA → look → letter
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support