Photo via Toronto Star

Steven Galloway's defamation trial exposes the cost of a rush to judgment

Read the original at Toronto Star ↗
Cite

DiManno, R. (2026, October 18). Steven Galloway's defamation trial exposes the cost of a rush to judgment. Toronto Star. https://www.thestar.com/opinion/star-columnists/steven-galloway-s-defamation-trial-exposes-the-cost-of-a-rush-to-judgment/article_b160b453-be32-4744-9c02-40bcc763cdc7.html

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Toronto Star · collected 2026-10-18 · by Rosie DiManno

Quick Summary

Steven Galloway, a former acclaimed author and University of British Columbia professor, is currently undergoing a defamation trial against his accuser and three other defendants. The lawsuit stems from unfounded allegations of sexual assault that led to Galloway's job loss and social ostracism despite an independent investigation clearing him of wrongdoing in 2016. One defendant, Chelsea Rooney, apologized for her role in spreading the false accusations online, acknowledging her misguided approach to supporting survivors of sexual violence. The trial highlights the consequences of a rush to judgment without evidence.
Written by AI on 2026-10-19, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Steven Galloway, a former acclaimed Canadian author, is currently undergoing a defamation trial in Vancouver that exposes the consequences of a rushed judgment. Eight years ago, Galloway lost his position as chair of UBC’s creative-writing program after facing accusations of sexual assault, despite never being criminally charged. The university pressured him to sign confidentiality agreements following what now appears to be an investigation marred by bias or errors. Since then, Galloway has faced social media attacks and isolation, leading him to abandon his writing career. His testimony in the ongoing trial highlights the personal toll of such accusations and the impact on his life and work.

Written for “Steven Galloway Defamation Trial” on 2026-11-04, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Steven Galloway Defamation Trial
Crime & Law · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 11% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
National Post
Hedges 3 of 28 claims Outlet record 60/100
“Article A discusses Margaret Atwood's criticism of media coverage regarding Steven Galloway, while Article B focuses on Galloway's defamation trial and its implications.”
The Globe and Mail
Hedges 3 of 28 claims Outlet record 52/100
“The articles describe different aspects of Steven Galloway's defamation trial; Article A discusses general sentiments and impacts, while Article B focuses on testimony from the accuser's ex-husband.”
The Globe and Mail
Hedges 2 of 24 claims Outlet record 52/100
“While both articles discuss Steven Galloway's defamation trial and his dismissal from UBC, they describe different aspects of the ongoing legal proceedings rather than a single specific incident.”
The Globe and Mail
Hedges 2 of 22 claims Outlet record 52/100
“The articles cover different aspects of the Steven Galloway defamation trial, with Article A focusing on testimony about efforts to gain public sympathy and Article B addressing broader commentary on media and institutional responses.”
CBC News
Hedges 1 of 8 claims Outlet record 71/100
“Article A describes Galloway's testimony in his defamation trial, while Article B is an opinion piece about the broader impact and context of the trial.”
The Globe and Mail
Hedges 2 of 26 claims Outlet record 52/100
“The articles describe different stages of Steven Galloway's legal proceedings and testimonies in his defamation trial.”
National Post
Hedges 3 of 48 claims Outlet record 60/100
“Article A discusses broader societal reactions to Steven Galloway's defamation trial, while Article B focuses on a specific testimony at the trial regarding UBC staff and an accuser.”
National Post
Hedges 2 of 16 claims Outlet record 60/100
“Article A discusses Steven Galloway's defamation trial and its broader implications, while Article B focuses on a UBC worker denying claims made during the trial.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
45
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
11%
5 of 45 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
64/100
Toronto Star's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Crime & Law
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-19 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Toronto Star · 11614 article(s) · 28 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 28 correction(s)
2026-10-26
Correction
2026-10-24
Correction
2026-10-07
Correction
2026-09-24
Correction

Who wrote this

Rosie DiManno
15 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Someone I always tried to avoid, would cross the street whenever I clocked him.
🔮 Beals, testifying at a coroner’s inquest Friday into the death of her daughter in May 2020, didn’t like it, not one bit, when coroner counsel Roger Shallow asked gently, respectfully, if she could hear the words she spoke, captured on security video.
🔮 I wish I could.
🔮 Obviously you could think what if this, what if that, but it is what it is.
🔮 I’m willing to play whatever role this team wants
🔮 It was Toronto’s third win and Bobrovsky’s first, aided by a five-point night from William Nylander and a two-goal third period from Auston Matthews, his empty-netter with 39 seconds left utterly deflating the crowd, although their team had flatlined long before.
🔮 Which, it’s hoped, will help elevate Stolarz to far better than the .893 save percentage he posted last season.
🔮 Yet still the outfit Marner poured his heart into alongside Auston Matthews, William Nylander, John Tavares and Morgan Rielly.
🔮 What matters most, even in the early sprout of a season: In the first skirmish of the Battle of Ontario, Ottawa knocked off Toronto 3-2, drawing first blood in what surely will be a frenzied wrangle for playoff inclusion in the fiercely contested Atlantic Division.
🔮 Bang-on prophecy: That William Nylander, on his first shift of the first game of the year (48 seconds after puck drop), would score Toronto’s first goal against the visiting Montreal Canadiens.
Also by Rosie DiManno
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 15 articles by Rosie DiManno →

Topics

Canadian The University of British Columbia UBC Vancouver

Subjects

Galloway PERSON · 8× Rooney PERSON · 5× A.B. PERSON · 1× Canadian NORP · 1× Chelsea Rooney PERSON · 1× Steven Galloway PERSON · 1× The University of British Columbia ORG · 1× UBC ORG · 1× Vancouver GPE · 1× the Supreme Court of Canada ORG · 1×

Narrative

But he lost his job as chair of UBC’s creative-writing program, was silenced by confidentiality agreements the university pressed him to sign following what in retrospect must have been a botched or at least aggressively skewed investigation, and was mercilessly savaged on social media.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-19
🔮 I wish I could.
2026-10-19 · Toronto Star
Steven Galloway's defamation trial exposes the cost of a rush to judgment · assertive framing

Claims (45 extracted, 5 hedged)

Because tales were told, stories more fictitious than the novels Steven Galloway wrote when he was still one of this country’s most acclaimed authors. asserted
he → tell → authors
Before his ordeal as an accused rapist rendered him, he says, incapable of ever writing anything again. asserted
he → accuse → anything
“I just can’t do it anymore. asserted
I → do → it
I wish I could. uncertain
I → wish → ?
I loved doing it. asserted
I → do → it
It was the greatest part of my life — it was the only thing that made me, me.” asserted
me → make → life
So he’s selling boats. asserted
he → sell → boats
The reckoning that Galloway sought for eight years is underway in a Vancouver courtroom where he spent most of last week in the witness stand, testifying to the torment, the despair, the ostracism and isolation of his Kafkaesque nightmare. asserted
he → seek → nightmare
Galloway was never criminally charged. asserted
Galloway → charge → ?
But he lost his job as chair of UBC’s creative-writing program, was silenced by confidentiality agreements the university pressed him to sign following what in retrospect must have been a botched or at least aggressively skewed investigation, and was mercilessly savaged on social media. asserted
what → lose → media
All of it with not a shred of evidence that he’d ever sexually assaulted anybody. asserted
he → assault → anybody
An independent investigation by a respected retired judge in 2016 concluded that, on the balance of probabilities, Galloway had not committed sexual assault or physical assault. asserted
Galloway → retire → assault
Instead, there were lies, a witch-hunt and the steaming pile of vomit that is the Internet unhinged amidst a firestorm of outrage. asserted
that → be → outrage
Galloway is finally getting his day, his voice restored in the defamation lawsuit brought against his accuser and three other defendants. asserted
voice → get → accuser
Originally, there was a dirty dozen of them, but nine settled before the trial began. asserted
trial → be → them
The primary orchestrator of Galloway’s vilification was a woman, one of his former students and an author herself, and a friend of the accuser—known only as A.B., her identity protected at this time but possibly not forever—who circulated the allegations online as fact. uncertain
who → know → fact
Chelsea Rooney tied Galloway to a 2015 university memo sent to students, faculty and staff, in which a professor was suspended over “serious allegations.” asserted
professor → tie → allegations
It was Rooney who, donning her Inquisition mantle, beat the bushes to gather more condemnatory material against Galloway. asserted
who → don → Galloway
On the eve of trial a fortnight ago, Rooney posted a grovelling apology online for the immeasurable damage she caused, conceding that her grasp of the “believe women” mantra promulgated by the MeToo movement was shaky and “misguided.” asserted
grasp → post → movement
“My position at the time was that an allegation was all that a person should require to come to the conclusion that an accused person was guilty, and I accused those who disagreed with this of doing harm to survivors,” she wrote. asserted
she → require → survivors
“I should have understood that supporting people who come forward about sexual violence does not require, and cannot justify, acting in ways that may lead others to conclude that unproven allegations are true or failing to give the person accused a fair opportunity to be heard and considered.” Oh, right. uncertain
allegations → understand → opportunity
That little thing called innocent until proven guilty and due process. asserted
thing → call → ?
Rooney’s ill-deeds reverberated within the university’s decision to suspend Galloway and then fire him. asserted
deeds → reverberate → him
“I know that nothing I say now can undo the harm or give back the years affected by these events,” Rooney concluded, “but I am genuinely sorry for the part I played in causing that harm. asserted
I → know → harm
Yet Rooney was among the defendants who fought the defamation case all the way to the Supreme Court of Canada, which tossed the appeal. asserted
which → fight → appeal
Maybe she was suddenly blinded by the blight of her zealotry, or maybe it explains why her name doesn’t appear in the winnowed list of defendants, reduced to four. asserted
name → blind → four
That encompasses A.B., whose lawyer stood up in court on Day 4 to say that his client was withdrawing her defences of truth and fair comment, but not admitting that she spread lies about Galloway. asserted
she → encompass → Galloway
The amended defence now maintains that she “reported sexual assaults,” not that she was sexually assaulted. asserted
she → amend → assaults
Arden Beddoes told B.C. Supreme Court Justice Neena Sharma that A.B. isn’t making an admission that the claims were false. uncertain
claims → tell → admission
This was a confusing distinction debated between Beddoes and the judge. asserted
This → debate → Beddoes
Sharma, taken aback, said she was “unconvinced…that there’s no difference in a defamation action between the court presuming falsity as a matter of law and making a finding of falsity on the evidence.” asserted
court → take → evidence
Adding, withdrawing the defence of justification without admitting the statements were false “doesn’t make falsity irrelevant.” asserted
falsity → add → justification
Every journalist knows that the ultimate defence against libel is truth. asserted
defence → know → libel
A.B. has chosen to sever truth from falsity. asserted
A.B. → choose → falsity
We’ll see how that dancing on a pin of semantics rolls out. asserted
dancing → see → semantics
Galloway has repeatedly testified that none of the three instances of alleged sexual assault ever happened and A.B.‘s “entire story is fictional.” asserted
story → testify → assault
What Galloway has admitted is that he and the woman, both married at the time, had a consensual sexual relationship, which he deeply regrets, and their split was “amicable.” asserted
split → admit → which
Or so he thought until broadsided and sacked by the university. asserted
he → think → university
Court has heard that, in a 2017 statement of claim filed by her then-lawyer, A.B. was seeking $3 million in damages, alleging negligence and other offences by the institution. uncertain
A.B. → hear → institution
It’s still unknown whether UBC ever paid out any portion of that demand, but it did give her a bursary of $30,000, to which Galloway says A.B. was never entitled because she’d already graduated. asserted
she → ’ → which
…and 5 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

🕘History 🎫Support