Photo via Daily Mail

The Greens have a serious problem with hypocrisy - and the allegations against Jordon Steele-John have exposed it: PVO

Read the original at Daily Mail ↗
Cite

Onselen, P. v. (2026, October 19). The Greens have a serious problem with hypocrisy - and the allegations against Jordon Steele-John have exposed it: PVO. Daily Mail. https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-16219409/The-Greens-problem-hypocrisy-allegations-against-Jordon-Steele-John-exposed-PVO.html?ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490&ito=1490

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Daily Mail · collected 2026-10-19 · by Peter van Onselen

Quick Summary

The article discusses how the Greens are being accused of hypocrisy regarding their handling of sexual misconduct allegations against Senator Jordon Steele-John. While they call for procedural fairness and an independent investigation into Steele-John's case, it highlights inconsistencies in their previous demands for immediate action when similar allegations were made against other politicians. Specifically, it contrasts their current approach with their earlier stance on Christian Porter’s rape allegation, where the Greens demanded confidence in the government be lost immediately due to the hanging sexual assault allegation against him. The piece also points out that internal documents suggest the Western Australian Greens had a detailed communications plan to manage how Steele-John's allegations were handled, which contradicts their public stance against politicizing such issues.
Written by AI on 2026-10-19, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Greens Senator Jordon Steele-John has taken leave from the party room amid allegations of inappropriate comments towards women, as reported by multiple sources including The Sydney Morning Herald. Greens leader David Shoebridge confirmed that Steele-John had requested and been granted leave to address the situation, which was backed by an independent investigation process. Seven current and former party members wrote a letter to Shoebridge demanding an inquiry into allegations spanning from 2017 to 2025, though Steele-John denies all claims and accuses Shoebridge of mishandling the matter for political reasons. The conflict has led to internal rifts within the Greens, with some members believing Steele-John's lengthy denial was premature and aimed at influencing public opinion before an investigation could conclude.

Written for “Greens Senator Leave Amid Allegations” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 13 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Greens Senator Leave Amid Allegations
Politics · 14 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly right and hedges 6% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Sydney Morning Herald
Hedges 6 of 85 claims Outlet record 61/100
“The articles discuss related issues concerning Senator Jordon Steele-John but describe different aspects and times: Article A focuses on a secret dossier and crisis communications strategy, while Article B critiques the Greens' hypocrisy regarding procedural fairness.”
The Sydney Morning Herald
Hedges 2 of 19 claims Outlet record 61/100
“While both articles discuss the Steele-John probe within the Greens party, they describe different aspects and contexts: Article A focuses on WA MPs urging public release of findings, while Article B critiques the party's handling of the allegations.”
BBC News
Hedges 6 of 12 claims Outlet record 68/100
The Guardian
Hedges 0 of 14 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the same broader situation involving Jordon Steele-John and misconduct allegations against him, but they do not describe the same specific incident.”
The Sydney Morning Herald
Hedges 0 of 32 claims Outlet record 61/100
“The articles discuss related issues and reactions to allegations against Jordon Steele-John, but they do not describe the same specific incident or occurrence.”
The Guardian
Hedges 3 of 23 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss related events surrounding allegations against Jordon Steele-John, but Article A focuses on the initial discovery of hypocrisy within the Greens party regarding calls for accountability, while Article B addresses the ongoing limbo and leadership challenges following the allegations.”
The Guardian
Hedges 2 of 18 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A discusses David Shoebridge's denial of knowledge about a 'secret dossier', while Article B comments on the hypocrisy of The Greens' stance regarding Jordon Steele-John's allegations, without mentioning the specific document.”
ABC News (AU)
Hedges 1 of 23 claims Outlet record 68/100
The Sydney Morning Herald
Hedges 2 of 40 claims Outlet record 61/100
“While both articles discuss the allegations against Senator Jordon Steele-John and calls for an independent investigation, they describe different aspects of the situation—one focuses on insiders demanding public findings, while the other critiques the party's hypocrisy in handling the allegations.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
32
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
6%
2 of 32 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
68/100
Daily Mail's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
14
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-19 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Daily Mail · 8489 article(s) · 20 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 20 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Peter van Onselen
23 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Chalmers can use the excuse of 'international pressures' until he's blue in the face, but Australians facing yet another increase in their mortgage repayments are entitled to ask what he will do to fix the situation.
🔮 Australians would settle for an aged care system that looks after the elderly and an energy project that bears some passing resemblance to its original price tag.
🔮 Winning an election by misleading voters, then doing what you reassured them you wouldn't do is hardly an achievement to gloat about.
🔮 Its embedded metadata named Albanese’s deputy communications director as creator and last editor, although metadata alone cannot conclusively establish authorship. Who knew about the dirt sheet, and contributed to writing it, could go much wider than one senior political staffer.
🔮 The document, obtained by the Daily Mail, attempted to smear Haines by cataloguing her own funding requests for her electorate and asking if she may have had personal connections to recipients of Federal government funding.
🔮 In June 2021, Larissa Waters declared Australians could not have confidence in the government while a minister remained in Cabinet with a rape allegation hanging over him.
🔮 And the uncomfortable truth for a government searching for someone to blame is that getting rid of either one would do precious little to absolve the other of the same fate: 'They're tied at the hip now.'
🔮 Perhaps small businesses should forget navigating government departments and simply ask for Albanese's mobile number? He even supplied the dialogue: 'It is in hand, I agree with what you are saying and I will get it done.' One man.
🔮 Which allows for the possibility that his next chapter could be better than his last.
🔮 Anika Wells' people said they would come back to me about her explanation for a birthday party trip in December 2025.
Also by Peter van Onselen
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 23 articles by Peter van Onselen →

Topics

Australians Cabinet Greens Liberals the WA Greens

Subjects

Greens ORG · 8× Waters PERSON · 3× Cabinet ORG · 2× Jordon Steele-John PERSON · 2× Larissa Waters PERSON · 2× Porter PERSON · 2× Steele-John PERSON · 2× Australians NORP · 1× Christian Porter PERSON · 1× David Shoebridge PERSON · 1×

Narrative

Senator Jordon Steele-John (pictured) denied any wrongdoing and rejected the allegations about his conduct towards women Now Greens leader David Shoebridge declines a ‘running commentary’ while an independent process examines concerns about his colleague.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-19
🔮 In June 2021, Larissa Waters declared Australians could not have confidence in the government while a minister remained in Cabinet with a rape allegation hanging over him.

Claims (32 extracted, 2 hedged)

The Greens have discovered natural justice. asserted
Greens → discover → justice
Apparently it was hiding underneath their stack of media releases demanding accountability from everybody else. asserted
it → hide → everybody
With Senator Jordon Steele-John facing allegations about his conduct towards women, suddenly the vocabulary is wonderfully careful: procedural fairness, independent investigation, proper process. asserted
vocabulary → face → women
Steele-John denies wrongdoing and deserves a fair hearing. asserted
John → deny → hearing
He says police investigated one sexual assault allegation and laid no charges. asserted
police → say → charges
None of this establishes his guilt, clearly. asserted
None → establish → guilt
But it does provide a useful opportunity to examine the Greens’ spectacularly selective appetite for restraint. asserted
it → provide → restraint
In June 2021, Larissa Waters declared Australians could not have confidence in the government while a minister remained in Cabinet with a rape allegation hanging over him. uncertain
allegation → declare → him
Porter denied the allegation. asserted
Porter → deny → allegation
Yet the allegation itself was sufficient for Waters to pronounce no confidence in the entire government. asserted
Waters → pronounce → government
Senator Jordon Steele-John (pictured) denied any wrongdoing and rejected the allegations about his conduct towards women Now Greens leader David Shoebridge declines a ‘running commentary’ while an independent process examines concerns about his colleague. asserted
process → picture → colleague
How convenient that political restraint becomes such a prized virtue when the microphone is pointed at your own party. asserted
microphone → become → party
To be fair, the Greens demanded an independent inquiry into Porter, too. asserted
Greens → demand → Porter
Although the allegations against him were historical dating back more than 30 years. asserted
allegations → date → years
The hypocrisy lies in the accompanying political prosecution: opponents must answer immediately for everything an allegation supposedly reveals about their character, leadership and party culture. asserted
allegation → lie → character
Their own side gets careful qualifications. asserted
side → get → qualifications
In March 2021, Waters accused Scott Morrison of treating sexual violence and misogyny as ‘another PR problem to be managed away’. asserted
Waters → accuse → problem
A Cabinet reshuffle, she argued, would merely shuffle the problem around. asserted
she → argue → problem
Now we learn the WA Greens maintained a crisis communications document about concerns involving Steele-John. asserted
Greens → learn → John
According to reports the document ran to 47 pages and included instructions for managing coverage and monitoring party members’ social media discussions. uncertain
document → accord → discussions
That is quite a commitment to managing communications from a party so disgusted by other people managing communications. asserted
That → manage → communications
The WA Greens say the historical allegations were unsubstantiated and the named people never lodged formal complaints. asserted
people → say → complaints
Shoebridge says he had no prior knowledge of the document. asserted
he → say → document
Greens leader Larissa Waters (pictured) has previously pronounced a no confidence in the entire government over a rape allegation however has a different approach to allegations thrown at a fellow party member What was examined? asserted
What → picture → member
Why was a communications plan required? asserted
plan → require → ?
What would Waters have said had this document belonged to the Liberals? asserted
document → say → Liberals
Steele-John is entitled to defend himself. asserted
John → entitle → himself
Complainants are entitled to have concerns properly examined. asserted
concerns → entitle → ?
Fairness requires both. asserted
Fairness → require → both
But the Greens can’t spend years turning other parties’ scandals into sermons about their own moral superiority, then complain when somebody checks beneath the pulpit. asserted
somebody → spend → pulpit
What happened to the ‘all victims should be believed’ principle? asserted
victims → happen → principle
The Greens keep treating it like a membership benefit you only get if you join their political party. asserted
you → treat → party
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support