Photo via Al Jazeera

Trump’s approval ratings plummet: what that means for the US midterms

Read the original at Al Jazeera ↗
Cite

Al Jazeera Staff. (2026, October 20). Trump’s approval ratings plummet: what that means for the US midterms. Al Jazeera. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/10/20/trumps-approval-ratings-plummet-what-that-means-for-the-us-midterms?traffic_source=rss

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Al Jazeera · collected 2026-10-20 · by Al Jazeera Staff

Quick Summary

Donald Trump's approval ratings have reached a record low of 31 percent according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll, with Democrats leading Republicans by 12 points in voter preference for the upcoming midterms on November 3. This trend suggests that Democrats may gain control over both houses of Congress as historically presidents typically see their party lose seats due to declining approval ratings during midterm elections.
Written by AI on 2026-10-20, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

As of October 20, 2026, President Donald Trump's approval ratings have fallen to a record low of 31 percent, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll. This decline is largely due to public discontent over rising living costs and the unpopular US-Israel war on Iran. The drop in support for Trump could negatively impact his Republican party in the upcoming midterms scheduled for November 3, where Democrats are aiming to flip both the US House of Representatives and the Senate. Historically, sitting presidents typically see their parties lose seats during midterm elections when approval ratings dip, but with Trump's ratings lower than any previous president at this stage, experts predict a significant shift in power towards the Democrats.

Written for “Trump Approval Ratings Plummet” on 2026-11-04, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Trump Approval Ratings Plummet
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 41% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 2 of 42 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of Trump's political situation and approval ratings, not a single specific incident.”
ABC News (AU)
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 9 of 43 claims Outlet record 67/100
“Article A discusses Trump's political maneuvering and actions perceived as detrimental to his political prospects, while Article B focuses on the decline in Trump's approval ratings. These describe related but distinct events.”
The Straits Times
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 6 of 30 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of Trump's political impact in distinct contexts: one on his approval ratings affecting US midterm elections, and another on his endorsement failing to help Netanyahu in Israeli elections.”
Al Jazeera
Hedges 12 of 129 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different aspects related to Trump's approval ratings and voter sentiment but do not describe the same specific incident or occurrence.”
The Independent
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 2 of 37 claims Outlet record 59/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of public opinion towards Trump and the midterms, not a single incident.”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans right further right than this Hedges 0 of 4 claims Outlet record 69/100
“The articles discuss different periods during Trump's presidency and contrasting economic conditions, not the same specific incident or time frame.”
Al Jazeera
Hedges 4 of 30 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles describe different actions by President Trump related to the midterm elections: one covers his approval ratings falling, and the other his financial commitment to Republican candidates.”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans right further right than this Hedges 0 of 3 claims Outlet record 69/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of Trump's political situation without focusing on the same specific incident.”
The Guardian
Hedges 6 of 61 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of President Trump's approval ratings and voter sentiment leading up to the midterms, but describe separate events and contexts.”
Al Jazeera
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 3 of 15 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different polls conducted by distinct organizations and present varying narratives on voter sentiment and approval ratings, indicating they describe separate reporting rather than the identical incident.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
39
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
41%
16 of 39 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
60/100
Al Jazeera's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-20 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Al Jazeera · 4846 article(s) · 3 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 3 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Al Jazeera Staff
871 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Their terms are set to begin on February 6, 2027.
🔮 The administration of United States President Donald Trump has stepped up its investigation into a US Senate race in the state of Alaska, where it says the Democratic Party put up a sham candidate to confuse voters so the Republican candidate would lose.
🔮 Recommended Stories list of 4 items- list 1 of 4How would Tehran respond if the US and Israel bomb Iran again? - list 2 of 4French
🔮 “Election officials are reassuring that they will be counted manually after everything is done,” Saloomey said, “and we don’t know of this issue in other districts across New York or the United States, and there are dozens that do use this system.”
🔮 Caribbean tour: Will he discuss slavery reparations?
🔮 Under its terms, Greenland will remain under Danish control – but the agreement would still apply if the island eventually chooses independence.
🔮 Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has said he hopes upcoming United States-mediated talks with Russia in Abu Dhabi will lead to a three-way meeting of leaders that includes Russian President Vladimir Putin.
🔮 Iran war latest - list 3 of 4Iran commander sets out five conditions for regional security - list 4 of 4Trump says US will stop giving Israel aid after year-end The agreement comes a day before President Isaac Herzog begins consultations with parties on who should form the next government.
🔮 The chief of staff of Iran’s armed forces has laid out five conditions for what he calls a roadmap to lasting security, as Qatar said it was “hopeful” that Tehran and Washington could reach a deal paving the way for future negotiations, despite overnight US strikes on Qeshm Island.
🔮 - list 2 of 3Trump cuts WHO off from Gavi vaccine alliance funding - list 3 of 3Yemen’s health system could collapse in some areas, minister warns “Two police personnel were martyred and another was injured in the attack.
Wire or desk byline, not an individual reporter.
Also by Al Jazeera Staff
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 871 articles by Al Jazeera Staff →

Topics

Americans Democrats Israel Republicans Senate

Subjects

Democrats NORP · 7× Republicans NORP · 5× Trump PERSON · 5× Americans NORP · 4× Senate ORG · 3× 4Trump PERSON · 2× House ORG · 2× Iran GPE · 2× Israel GPE · 2× United States GPE · 1×

Narrative

But when Clinton’s approval rose to 66 percent by the next midterms in 1998, Democrats lost only five seats. What does that mean for Trump? Researchers say Trump’s plummeting ratings amid the US-Israel war on Iran are highly likely to affect Republicans negatively.
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-20
🔮 United States President Donald Trump’s approval ratings have fallen to a record low, a sign that Americans angry about rising living costs amid the deeply unpopular US-Israel war on Iran could punish his party at the upcoming midterm elections.

Claims (39 extracted, 16 hedged)

United States President Donald Trump’s approval ratings have fallen to a record low, a sign that Americans angry about rising living costs amid the deeply unpopular US-Israel war on Iran could punish his party at the upcoming midterm elections. uncertain
Americans → fall → elections
Most Americans are unhappy with Trump’s performance, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll published on Monday, with more people saying they plan to vote for Democrats on November 3. uncertain
they → accord → November
Recommended Stories list of 4 items- list 1 of 4Why has search of Ilhan Omar’s home before US midterms caused controversy? - list 2 of 4No ‘turmoil’ at the White House - list 3 of 4Trump backs Netanyahu: Is the US planning a new Iran attack with Israel? asserted
US → cause → Israel
- list 4 of 4Trump approval hits record-low 31 percent, polls show Republican struggles Sitting US presidents have traditionally seen a dip in approval ratings around the midterms, and that has often coincided with their parties losing seats in Congress. asserted
parties → hit → Congress
With Trump’s ratings lower than any of his predecessors, experts say Democrats could reach their goal of flipping both the US House of Representatives and the Senate in the congressional vote. uncertain
Democrats → say → vote
Republicans currently hold a slim majority of 218-214 seats in the House, and are also leading in the Senate, with a 53-47 majority. asserted
Republicans → hold → majority
However, Democrats are campaigning hard to seize majorities in both houses, a scenario that could prove a major headache for Trump. uncertain
that → campaign → Trump
Here’s what the latest polls might mean for these elections: uncertain
polls → ’ → elections
What do the latest polls show? asserted
polls → show → What
About 31 percent of Americans polled by Reuters/Ipsos said they were happy with Trump’s performance – the lowest-ever figure during Trump’s two terms as president. asserted
they → poll → president
Two weeks earlier, the number stood at 32 percent. asserted
number → stand → percent
When asked which party they would vote for if the midterms were held today, 47 percent chose Democrats, while 35 percent opted for Republicans. asserted
percent → ask → Republicans
That represents a 12-point advantage for the Democrats, the widest ever in the current cycle, and is up from the seven-point lead two weeks ago. asserted
That → represent → lead
The slide in support for Republicans came from the growing number of women choosing Democrats – about half of those polled. asserted
slide → come → those
More voters – 40 percent – also said Democrats were better at managing the economy, compared with 33 percent who selected Republicans. asserted
who → say → Republicans
The polls, which canvassed 1,679 adults, are a generic ballot providing an overview of voter sentiment, but not a state-by-state breakdown, meaning the results could still be surprising. uncertain
results → canvass → state
The president and party in charge of the White House usually face some backlash in the midterms. asserted
president → face → midterms
Supporters of the non-presidential party are often more motivated to vote in the midterms than their counterparts, according to the University of Virginia’s Center for Politics. uncertain
Supporters → vote → Politics
The think tank also found that in 12 of the past 20 midterm elections since 1946, the sitting president’s approval ratings worsened between July and November, the months just before the elections. asserted
ratings → find → elections
Only in seven instances did approval ratings improve, while in one case, during the 2006 elections under President George W Bush, the president’s approval ratings stayed the same. asserted
ratings → improve → Bush
What has that pattern meant for midterm results? asserted
pattern → mean → results
With a dip in presidential ratings being the norm, a more favourable view of the sitting president still often correlates with the governing party losing fewer seats in the midterms, according to researchers. uncertain
party → sit → researchers
When presidential approval ratings are much lower, the party in power often loses more seats. asserted
party → lose → seats
In the 20 midterm elections held since 1946, the governing party lost seats in the House of Representatives in 18 instances, although a well-liked president often cushioned the effect, according to data from The American Presidency Project run by the University of California (UC), Santa Barbara. uncertain
president → hold → California
For example, Americans’ favourable view of President George Bush – 75 percent in the 1990 midterms – saw Republicans lose only eight seats across the two houses. asserted
Republicans → see → houses
But research aggregating the UC Santa Barbara data found that when presidents have approval ratings below 50 percent, their party was likely to have a bad election. asserted
party → aggregate → election
In 1994, for example, when President Bill Clinton’s first midterm approval rating stood at 46 percent, Democrats lost 52 seats in Congress. asserted
Democrats → stand → Congress
But when Clinton’s approval rose to 66 percent by the next midterms in 1998, Democrats lost only five seats. What does that mean for Trump? Researchers say Trump’s plummeting ratings amid the US-Israel war on Iran are highly likely to affect Republicans negatively. asserted
ratings → rise → Republicans
With Trump’s generally low ratings – the lowest of any president in US history, according to UC Santa Barbara’s aggregate – researchers say the odds that Republicans will keep their thin majority in Congress are very small. uncertain
Republicans → accord → Congress
The question, however, remains just how badly the party could be hurt by Trump’s policies. uncertain
party → remain → policies
Republicans might have some hope yet. uncertain
Republicans → have → hope
According to the Center for Politics, presidential approval in the past five midterms has generally been slightly higher in exit polls than in pre-election polling, because those later surveys include people who have actually voted. uncertain
who → accord → people
That means the midterm results ultimately hinge on how well parties convince supporters to actually cast their ballots. asserted
parties → mean → ballots
How many seats could the Democrats take? uncertain
Democrats → take → seats
According to NBC News, which conducts its own polling and provides state-by-state breakdowns, Senate Democrats are likely to win North Carolina and Maine from the Republicans. uncertain
Democrats → accord → Republicans
NBC also sees Alaska, Iowa and Texas as states that could go either way. uncertain
that → see → states
In the House of Representatives, NBC predicts “possible flips” from Republican to Democrat in 15 districts. asserted
NBC → predict → districts
It rates four districts currently held by Republicans and three held by Democrats as “toss-up”. asserted
It → rat → Democrats
If the Democrats were to win all of those close contests without losing any of their current seats, they would gain a total of 22 seats in the House of Representatives and five in the Senate. asserted
they → win → Senate
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support