Photo via The Independent

Trump’s botched execution on Katie Zacharia speaks volumes about Susie Wiles’ future

Read the original at The Independent ↗
Cite

Feinberg, A. (2026, October 20). Trump’s botched execution on Katie Zacharia speaks volumes about Susie Wiles’ future. The Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/katie-zacharia-trump-wiles-analysis-b3069514.html

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

The Independent · collected 2026-10-20 · by Andrew Feinberg

Quick Summary

Susie Wiles, President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, quickly quashed rumors of her impending dismissal following the botched tenure of Katie Zacharia as press secretary. Zacharia, hired without Wiles’ knowledge, lasted only five days, during which she made several gaffes including referring to herself incorrectly as a lawyer and failing to answer questions smoothly. Trump fired Zacharia after she appeared on Fox News for an interview widely criticized as ineffective. This series of events highlights the delicate balance Wiles must maintain in her role to protect her position from further threats.
Written by AI on 2026-10-20, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Donald Trump nearly replaced Susie Wiles, his longest-serving chief of staff, after a week of internal White House discussions about potential successors. The initial buzz started when Politico reported that Trump was considering several names, including informal advice from friends. However, the situation shifted dramatically when Trump hired an unqualified TV personality as top spokesperson over Wiles' objections. This decision backfired within 72 hours when the hire was heavily criticized on Trump’s favorite TV channel. Consequently, Trump essentially fired the new hire himself in a public spectacle on the South Lawn while Marine One idled behind him. The episode served as a stark warning to those contemplating Wiles' departure and reinforced her position despite earlier rumors.

Written for “Trump's Attack On Journalistkaza Zacharia” on 2026-11-01, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Trump's Attack On Journalistkaza Zacharia
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 7% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Daily Mail
Hedges 7 of 72 claims Outlet record 68/100
“The articles discuss different aspects related to Susie Wiles' position but describe distinct events and timelines.”
Daily Mail
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 0 of 48 claims Outlet record 68/100
“The articles discuss different stages and aspects of Katie Zacharia's brief tenure as White House press secretary, rather than a single specific incident.”
The Sydney Morning Herald
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 4 of 31 claims Outlet record 61/100
“The articles discuss different time periods and foci within Katie Zacharia's short tenure as press secretary.”
October 16, 2026 Different event
Letters from an American
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 7 of 52 claims
“Article A discusses Katie Zacharia's resignation as White House press secretary, while Article B mentions Susie Wiles' position as chief of staff and potential replacement rumors.”
The Independent
Hedges 4 of 34 claims Outlet record 59/100
“The articles discuss different aspects related to Susie Wiles and Katie Zacharia but do not describe the same specific incident.”
Daily Mail
Hedges 1 of 25 claims Outlet record 68/100
“Article A discusses Katie Zacharia's dismissal as White House press secretary and subsequent social media issues, while Article B focuses on Susie Wiles' position as chief of staff and rumors about her potential replacement.”
Daily Mail
Hedges 2 of 39 claims Outlet record 68/100
“The articles describe different events related to Katie Zacharia, one about her appointment as White House press secretary and another about rumors surrounding Susie Wiles' position.”
Los Angeles Times
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 7 of 31 claims Outlet record 95/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of internal issues within Trump's administration, with Article A focusing on Katie Zacharia's resignation and Article B speculating about Susie Wiles' position as chief of staff.”
New York Post
Hedges 8 of 27 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles describe different stages of speculation and confirmation regarding Susie Wiles' position as chief of staff, rather than a single specific incident.”
National Post
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 4 of 45 claims Outlet record 60/100
“While both articles discuss internal White House turmoil involving Katie Zacharia and Susie Wiles, they describe different phases or aspects of the situation rather than a single specific incident.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
28
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
7%
2 of 28 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
59/100
The Independent's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-20 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Independent · 3463 article(s) · 8 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 8 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Andrew Feinberg
28 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 With days to go until what polls indicate will be a brutal midterm election for President Donald Trump and his Republican Party, the man who has implored MAGA voters to “pretend I’m on the ballot” is starting to panic.
🔮 Who could have guessed that Trump would get so spun up over a law that’s been on the books since Abraham Lincoln was president?
🔮 “Well, I guess you could say for that particular purpose, for the purpose of allowing a man who was thinking he was going to be in prison for life out.
🔮 “Well, I guess you could say for that particular purpose, for the purpose of allowing a man who was thinking he was going to be in prison for life out.
🔮 Who could have guessed that Trump would get so spun up over a law that’s been on the books since Abraham Lincoln was president?
🔮 It didn’t take Susie Wiles more than a few day to put a stop to the buzz in Washington that predicted her time as chief of staff was up.
🔮 President Donald Trump said on Monday that the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool is “70% filled with water and looking good” and warned that anyone who damages it again “will GO TO JAIL,” even though federal prosecutors appointed by Trump himself have told a court the pool’s lining was ruined by a botched installation and not by vandals.
🔮 You think about it, but I wouldn’t reconsider.
🔮 He reportedly has found no shortage of people willing to encourage him to dump his loyal aide overboard, with one GOP operative noting that Wiles has “burned a lot of people” in her time leading Trump’s administration.
🔮 She was asked about how she will handle the notoriously tough press secretary role while juggling being a mother to four children given how her predecessor chose to resign over the burdens of balancing the job with caring for just two children.
Also by Andrew Feinberg
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 28 articles by Andrew Feinberg →

Topics

Florida Independent Politico Washington White House

Subjects

Wiles PERSON · 7× Zacharia PERSON · 7× Trump PERSON · 5× Hannity PERSON · 3× White House ORG · 3× Fox News ORG · 2× Politico ORG · 2× Susie Wiles PERSON · 2× Independent ORG · 1× Washington GPE · 1×

Narrative

After the president went around his chief of staff to hire an unqualified TV personality as his top spokesperson, his choice was disassembled on his favorite TV channel within 72 hours, leading him to all but fire her himself on the South Lawn while Marine One idled behind him. If anyone spent last week measuring the drapes in the chief of staff’s office, seeing Zacharia’s hide nailed to Wiles’ wall was a useful warning.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-20
🔮 It didn’t take Susie Wiles more than a few day to put a stop to the buzz in Washington that predicted her time as chief of staff was up.

Claims (28 extracted, 2 hedged)

It didn’t take Susie Wiles more than a few day to put a stop to the buzz in Washington that predicted her time as chief of staff was up. asserted
time → take → staff
The rumors started swirling on Thursday when Politico reported President Donald Trump had been on the phone with his friends and informal advisors asking if they thought he should replace Wiles, his longest-serving chief of staff. asserted
he → swirl → staff
Citing four sources with direct knowledge of the president’s conversations, the outlet reported that Trump had been floating several names for a successor to the veteran Florida political operative, who is the first woman to serve as White House chief of staff. asserted
who → cite → staff
A day later, more reports indicated that Trump’s close aide Natalie Harp had been bringing him articles about the possibility of replacing Wiles, which caused him to fly off the handle and make even more calls to more allies, with another source claiming that Wiles and her team were frantically calling people all over town to get them to vouch for her in turn. asserted
them → indicate → turn
The evidence for Wiles’ tentative grip on her post had shown up at the White House days earlier in the form of Katie Zacharia, who Trump hired as his press secretary the previous Friday without informing Wiles, who had been working for weeks to secure CNN’s resident MAGA voice Scott Jennings as Karoline Leavitt's replacement. asserted
who → show → replacement
She lasted from Monday to Friday. asserted
She → last → Friday
During her 14 minutes at the podium on Tuesday, Zacharia read haltingly off a script for eight of those minutes, answered three questions from friendly media outlets, referred to her husband as "my president," and announced the firing of the ambassador to Greece as she walked out the door. asserted
she → read → door
The same day, she was pressed on reports that she’d never passed any state bar despite holding herself out as a “lawyer” in multiple television appearances over the last year. asserted
she → press → year
The story festered on Wednesday and Thursday as Zacharias attempted to clean up the mess by claiming some difference between the terms “lawyer” and ‘attorney” before conceding that she’d failed the California bar exam and never retaken it. asserted
she → fester → it
That’s when Wiles appears to have struck. asserted
Wiles → ’ → ?
That night, Zacharia appeared on Fox News host — and close confidant of Trump — Sean Hannity’s program for a train-wreck of an interview that was as bad as, if not worse than, her brief briefing had been days earlier. asserted
briefing → appear → interview
Hannity opened his show by telling Zacharia that her briefing had been "widely panned," then walked Zacharia through the bar exam question until Zacharia admitted that she had never taken it again. asserted
she → open → it
Another hit on the Fox & Friends morning show on Friday didn’t go much better, and by the end of the day, Zacharia was given the boot minutes after Trump told reporters he’d told her she should “reconsider” her decision to take the job. asserted
she → go → job
A source told Politico that the Fox bookings were a "sanctioned hit,” and another source was more blunt,” describing the chief of staff as having “fed her to Hannity." asserted
source → tell → Hannity
Denials were rapid and came from everywhere, with White House Communications Director Steven Cheung calling the report "fiction that's not even creative” and a senior White House official alleging that Wiles "did not need to feed her to Sean or anybody else” because “it's not her style." asserted
it → come → Sean
Fox News told The Independent that Hannity books his own guests and that "Susie Wiles and Danielle Alvarez had nothing to do with the booking." asserted
Wiles → tell → booking
Others suggested that Zacharia had sealed her fate in the briefing room on Tuesday without any help from anyone. uncertain
Zacharia → suggest → anyone
Does any of that matter? asserted
any → matter → that
Not really, because the message sent by the ex-press secretary’s quick ouster was clear. asserted
message → send → ouster
After the president went around his chief of staff to hire an unqualified TV personality as his top spokesperson, his choice was disassembled on his favorite TV channel within 72 hours, leading him to all but fire her himself on the South Lawn while Marine One idled behind him. If anyone spent last week measuring the drapes in the chief of staff’s office, seeing Zacharia’s hide nailed to Wiles’ wall was a useful warning. asserted
hide → go → wall
In contrast to Zacharia, on the short end of the scale, Wiles has lasted longer in her job than anyone Trump has had in it across two administrations, and the West Wing has gone two years without the leak wars that characterized 2017. asserted
that → last → 2017
Going around Wiles to hire the second press secretary of his second term produced, on a compressed schedule, exactly the kind of personnel disaster her process exists to prevent — nobody in the White House vetting even asked Zacharia about the bar exam, as she told Fox & Friends herself the next morning. asserted
she → go → Fox
Trump, who has been known to fib about such things, subsequently said there is "zero chance" he replaces Wiles and that she has his "COMPLETE confidence,” and a White House spokesperson told The Independent last week that "these anonymous sources know nothing." asserted
sources → know → nothing
Meanwhile, the names still being circulated to replace Wiles are mostly men Trump knows from television, from Palm Beach, or from the campaign — the same “central casting” process that just produced five days of Katie Zacharia. asserted
that → circulate → Zacharia
Anyone on that list would do well to study what happened to the last person who arrived by that route. asserted
who → do → route
Wiles' superpower was never that Trump could not go around her. uncertain
Trump → go → her
It was that he did not. asserted
he → do → ?
He did, once, and the entire world got to see how it ended. asserted
it → do → ?
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support