Photo via New York Post

Obama’s empty Omar defense, settler violence shames Israel and other commentary

Read the original at New York Post ↗
Cite

Post Editorial Board. (2026, October 21). Obama’s empty Omar defense, settler violence shames Israel and other commentary. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2026/10/21/opinion/obamas-empty-omar-defense-settler-violence-shames-israel-and-other-commentary/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

New York Post · collected 2026-10-21 · by Post Editorial Board

Quick Summary

The article presents several opinion pieces: one criticizes former President Obama for defending Rep. Ilhan Omar without knowing the details of federal investigations; another discusses Israeli inaction regarding Jewish settler violence against Palestinians; a third critiques the BBC's handling of a documentary on J.K. Rowling and her views on gender identity; and finally, it addresses Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed’s reluctance to discuss his family's ties to the Muslim Brotherhood.
Written by AI on 2026-10-21, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

In an editorial, the New York Post criticizes former President Barack Obama's defense of Representative Ilhan Omar, arguing that Obama is making "fact-free assertions" about political investigations. The Post also highlights concerns over settler violence in Israel, noting that 660 attacks by Jewish settlers killed six Palestinians in the first half of 2026, with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu seemingly indifferent to stopping such vigilantism despite condemning it publicly.

The criticism towards Obama centers on his claim that investigating Rep. Omar is an abuse of power and a selective targeting based on political beliefs, without knowing the evidence behind the investigation. Meanwhile, in Israel, the Post expresses frustration over the lack of action from authorities to address the violence by Jewish settlers against Palestinians, despite official statements condemning such acts.

The New York Post editorial further suggests that Obama's stance reflects hypocrisy given his own administration’s controversial handling of investigations during his presidency, implying a double standard in political scrutiny.

Written for “Obama Defends Omar” on 2026-11-01, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Obama Defends Omar
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 12% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Straits Times
Hedges 1 of 13 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles describe different aspects of the incident: Article A reports on Obama's defense of Ilhan Omar, while Article B critiques and responds to Obama's statement.”
Al Jazeera
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 4 of 37 claims Outlet record 60/100
“Article A describes an Al Jazeera investigation challenging Israeli accounts of an attack, while Article B discusses commentary on a political issue involving President Obama and Rep. Ilhan Omar.”
New York Post
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 1 of 24 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of President Obama's stance towards Israel, with Article A focusing on his defense of Rep. Ilhan Omar and criticism of investigations targeting her, while Article B focuses on his endorsement of an antisemitic candidate.”
NBC News
Hedges 0 of 18 claims Outlet record 60/100
“Article A describes Obama's condemnation of the investigation into Ilhan Omar, while Article B discusses a conservative critique of Obama's stance on the matter.”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 70/100
“Article A covers Obama's criticism of the investigation into Ilhan Omar, while Article B includes commentary that critiques Obama for defending Omar.”
Washington Examiner
Hedges 0 of 4 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of Obama's stance on Ilhan Omar and do not focus on the exact same occurrence.”
Fox News
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 7 of 31 claims Outlet record 69/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of Barack Obama's statements and actions, with Article A focusing on his comments about Israel during a visit to Northern Ireland, while Article B critiques Obama's defense of Rep. Ilhan Omar.”
BBC News
Hedges 4 of 28 claims Outlet record 68/100
“Article A reports on Barack Obama's reaction to Ilhan Omar being under federal investigation, while Article B discusses a broader commentary批评奥巴马对伊尔汗·奥马尔的辩护,并不直接描述同一具体事件。”
Daily Mail
Hedges 0 of 12 claims Outlet record 68/100
“Article A describes an attack on a journalist by Israeli settlers, while Article B discusses political commentary related to President Obama and Rep. Ilhan Omar.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
25
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
12%
3 of 25 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
66/100
New York Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-21 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

New York Post · 15728 article(s) · 35 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 35 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Post Editorial Board
117 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Meanwhile, Gov. Kathy Hochul is clearly signaling tax hikes next year to help fund Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s socialism-in-one-city, not to mention the state’s coming $32 billion budget hole.
🔮 It may well be a federal crime, as a conspiracy to deceive and injure the public’s exercise of constitutional voting rights.
🔮 “The people united will never be defeated!
🔮 “The fact that any president, or any administration, is willing to engage in such transparent efforts to intimidate someone should outrage all Americans.” Yes, it’s awful that Ilhan Omar was being investigated by — checks the record — the Obama administration.
🔮 — Barack Obama, Saturday We say: Will Obama never stop glazing the “Death to America” crew?
🔮 Nick LaLota and Andrew Garbarino of the 1st and 2nd districts, covering Suffolk and a slice of Nassau, are solid moderates with a proven willingness to work across the aisle without sacrificing their commitment to core values of lower taxes and limited government.
🔮 Benjamin Netanyahu and his Likud Party are the winners in the Israeli election — though their coalition will likely fall short of a majority, so Israel will probably head to fresh elections in a few months.
🔮 She’s also used an “immigration specialist” to help frame “dispositions that will prevent unwanted immigration consequences.”
🔮 The rioting — a black-bloc assault on the Colosseum! — should be a wakeup call, prompting Macron & Co. to rally the sensible center against the anarchists, crypto-communists and Islamists. Stand up for civilization, or the assault will redouble.
🔮 Credible sources discredit the notion that her father could “rise to the rank of colonel with no role in that military’s massive-scale genocide.”
Wire or desk byline, not an individual reporter.
Also by Post Editorial Board
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 117 articles by Post Editorial Board →

Topics

BBC Britain Israel Jewish Palestinians

Subjects

BBC ORG · 4× Brotherhood ORG · 3× Obama PERSON · 3× Britain GPE · 2× Israel GPE · 2× Jewish NORP · 2× ObamaCare ORG · 2× Palestinians NORP · 2× Rowling PERSON · 2× Omar PERSON · 1×

Narrative

Finally, notes York, El-Sayed refused Saturday to clearly disavow the Brotherhood; he “turned the question away from himself” into an assault on the questioner’s motives, even sermonizing on “John F. Kennedy’s statements on Catholicism during the 1960 presidential campaign — as if there were any equivalence between the Catholic Church and a U.S. government-designated terrorist organization.”
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-21
🔮 Or maybe he assumes “the bar for investigating political adversaries is just as low” as during his administration.

Claims (25 extracted, 3 hedged)

President Barack Obama is “not just backing radical leftists,” observes The Wall Street Journal’s James Freeman, but “making fact-free assertions that investigating a particular radical member of Congress is an abuse of power.” asserted
investigating → back → power
Obama charges Team Trump with “selectively” targeting Rep. Ilhan Omar for her “political beliefs,” when he can’t “know what evidence exists” to prompt that investigation. asserted
evidence → charge → investigation
How did the feds “persuade a judge to sign a warrant,” especially since the judge is a Democrat? asserted
judge → persuade → warrant
Calling Obama a hypocrite is “fair,” given how his administration “poisoned our politics” and abused its power with the Russia collusion hoax. asserted
administration → call → hoax
Or maybe he assumes “the bar for investigating political adversaries is just as low” as during his administration. asserted
bar → assume → administration
Mideast watch: Settler Violence Shames Israel “In the first six months of 2026, 660 settler attacks killed six Palestinians,” frets Yardena Schwartz at The Free Press. asserted
Schwartz → sham → Press
Yet the “most pressing problem” is “the Israeli government’s apparent disinterest in stopping them.” asserted
problem → stop → them
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu claims he won’t stand for “vigilantism,” but then “why are Jewish extremists permitted to carry out repeated attacks against unarmed Palestinians” with “near-total impunity?” uncertain
extremists → claim → impunity
But Israel is responsible for maintaining law and order wherever it is violated, regardless of the perpetrators’ nationality.” asserted
it → maintain → nationality
If it “continues to stand by” and allow Jewish attacks, the violence “risks becoming a stain on the very people and history they claim to be fighting for.” uncertain
they → continue → people
Culture critic: The BBC’s Trans Delusions “When the BBC announced last week it was making a two-part documentary series about J.K. Rowling,” grumbles Malcolm Clark at Spiked, trans activists reacted as if “the Beeb was part of a giant, right-wing conspiracy.” asserted
Beeb → announce → conspiracy
Yet the release “describes Rowling as ‘one of Britain’s most polarising public figures’ ” merely because “she defends the factual reality of biological sex” — the majority position. asserted
she → describe → position
It’s clear Rowling won’t participate in the documentary, knowing she wouldn’t “be treated fairly” since the BBC “long ago gave up even trying to feign impartiality when it comes to issues around sex and gender.” asserted
it → ’ → sex
Future historians detailing the decline of the BBC will likely highlight the moment it alienated “Britain’s most successful living writer.” asserted
it → detail → writer
Campaign beat: El-Sayed’s Brotherhood Dodge Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed aims “to portray valid questions about his background and his associations as Islamophobia,” fumes the Washington Examiner’s Byron York. asserted
York → aim → Islamophobia
He dodges questions on his family’s ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, claiming his opponent’s “only strategy is to point to me and my name and my faith and to say that we’re different.” asserted
we → dodge → me
Confronted with evidence of his mom’s Brotherhood ties, he says, “I have never had these conversations with my mother. asserted
I → confront → mother
I wasn’t raised by my mother.” asserted
I → raise → mother
Finally, notes York, El-Sayed refused Saturday to clearly disavow the Brotherhood; he “turned the question away from himself” into an assault on the questioner’s motives, even sermonizing on “John F. Kennedy’s statements on Catholicism during the 1960 presidential campaign — as if there were any equivalence between the Catholic Church and a U.S. government-designated terrorist organization.” asserted
he → note → Church
“Many people with ObamaCare coverage could see their premiums rise” up to 50% “in just two years,” warns Merrill Matthews at The Hill. uncertain
Matthews → see → Hill
Critics predicted such price hikes from the start; turns out Democrats couldn’t “make health insurance work the way they wanted it to work.” asserted
it → predict → start
Their COVID-era enhanced subsidies “simply masked the real cost of the premium increases.” asserted
subsidies → mask → increases
Without the extra cash, premiums will rise and dropouts increase (mostly “younger and healthier people”), making “the health insurance pool smaller and sicker, which will force premiums even higher.” asserted
which → rise → premiums
Plus: “2.6 million improper and phantom enrollments” will soon be be dropped, further reducing de-facto subsidies. asserted
enrollments → drop → subsidies
“Can anything stop or reverse ObamaCare’s death spiral? asserted
anything → stop → spiral
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support