Photo via Dawn

LHC summons Punjab home secretary, Kot Lakhpat jail superintendent in plea seeking release of Imran’s sisters

Read the original at Dawn ↗
Cite

Sheikh, W. A. (2026, October 22). LHC summons Punjab home secretary, Kot Lakhpat jail superintendent in plea seeking release of Imran’s sisters. Dawn. https://www.dawn.com/news/2038971/lhc-summons-punjab-home-secretary-kot-lakhpat-jail-superintendent-in-plea-seeking-release-of-imrans-sisters

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Dawn · collected 2026-10-22 · by Wajih Ahmad Sheikh

Quick Summary

The Lahore High Court summoned Punjab’s home secretary and Kot Lakhpat jail superintendent on Thursday to address a petition seeking the release of Imran Khan’s three detained sisters — Aleema Khan, Noreen Niazi, and Uzma Khan. These women were arrested under the Punjab Maintenance of Public Order Ordinance in September for 30 days as PTI prepared for protests towards Islamabad; however, their detention has continued beyond this period. Advocate Rana Mudassar Umar argued before Justice Abher Gul Khan that the legal grounds for their arrest expired on October 19 and 20, respectively, but they remain incarcerated. The court directed both officials to appear with reports on October 28 and ordered their release if detention is found unjustified.
Written by AI on 2026-10-22, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

On October 20, 2026, the Lahore High Court summoned the Punjab home secretary and the superintendent of Kot Lakhpat Jail to address a plea for the release of Imran Khan's three sisters — Aleema Khan, Noreen Niazi, and Uzma Khan. These women were detained on September 20, under the Punjab Maintenance of Public Order Ordinance, 1960, as the PTI prepared for a protest march towards Islamabad. The detention was initially set to last 30 days but has been extended without official documentation. Aleema’s son, Shahrez Khan, filed a fresh plea challenging their continued detention after the initial period ended on October 19 and 20. Advocate Rana Mudassar Umar argued that the detention orders had expired, yet the sisters remained in jail. The judge questioned why the Lahore deputy commissioner was not made a respondent in the petition, suggesting procedural concerns might delay or complicate their release.

Written for “Imran Khan Sisters' Release Plea” on 2026-11-04, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Imran Khan Sisters' Release Plea
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 11% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Dawn
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 5 of 43 claims Outlet record 72/100
“The articles describe different legal actions related to separate cases involving detention of individuals linked to Imran Khan's protest plans and a security breach case.”
The Hindu
Hedges 0 of 14 claims Outlet record 77/100
“The articles discuss related events but do not describe the exact same incident; Article A refers to the Lahore High Court summoning officials in response to a plea for release, while Article B reports on an extension of detention by the Punjab government.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
18
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
11%
2 of 18 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
72/100
Dawn's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-22 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Dawn · 2683 article(s) · 3 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 3 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Wajih Ahmad Sheikh
38 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 According to the report submitted to the court, the women alleged that armed men guarded them at the house, threatened them with a knife, a gun and a piece of broken mirror, and warned that they would be killed and their body parts sold if they failed to meet the demands.
🔮 He expressed concern over her health, saying she was an elderly woman and her actual condition could only be ascertained after meeting her.
🔮 The Punjab government on Monday told the Lahore High Court (LHC) that a civilian who commits an offence against the state and is convicted cannot claim the protection of fundamental rights, while seeking the dismissal of a petition filed by Barrister Hassaan Khan Niazi, nephew of PTI founder Imran Khan, challenging his handover to the army and subsequent trial in a case related to the May 9 riots.
🔮 Justice Khan then sought reports from the Punjab Home Department and said he would examine the matter after going through the reports. Among the three detainees, Noreen had been shifted to the Punjab Institute of Cardiology (PIC) following her deteriorating health, on the recommendation of the doctors of the Kot Lakhpat Jail, where she has been detained.
🔮 Justice Khan then sought reports from the Punjab Home Department and said he would examine the matter after going through the reports.
🔮 Justice Khan then sought reports from the Punjab Home Department and said he would examine the matter after going through the reports.
🔮 He further argued that suspending the detention notification would pave the way for the women’s release.
🔮 The judge distinguished between accessibility and service, observing that an order may be accessible without having been served in accordance with the law.
2026-10-30 · mixed framing · IRIS access alone is not legal service, LHC rules
🔮 During a pending appeal before an appellate court, the petitioner had offered in August 2023 to have the matter decided by an oath on the Holy Quran taken by the opposing side, with a condition that the oath-taker’s wife would stand divorced if the oath proved false.
🔮 The chief minister declared that she stood “firmly with the oppressed, regardless of how powerful their oppressors may be”.
Also by Wajih Ahmad Sheikh
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 38 articles by Wajih Ahmad Sheikh →

Topics

LAHORE PTI Punjab The Lahore High Court the Punjab Maintenance of Public Order Ordinance

Subjects

LAHORE GPE · 3× Imran PERSON · 2× Aleema Khan PERSON · 1× Imran Khan PERSON · 1× Islamabad GPE · 1× Noreen Niazi PERSON · 1× PTI ORG · 1× Punjab GPE · 1× The Lahore High Court ORG · 1× Uzma Khan PERSON · 1×

Narrative

All three of Imran’s sisters — Aleema Khan, Noreen Niazi and Uzma Khan — were detained by authorities in September, under the Punjab Maintenance of Public Order Ordinance, 1960, as the PTI geared up for a planned protest march towards Islamabad.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-22
🔮 The judge, however, observed that the official could not be summoned as he had not been made a party to the petition.

Claims (18 extracted, 2 hedged)

The Lahore High Court on Thursday summoned the Punjab home secretary and the superintendent of Kot Lakhpat Jail in a petition seeking the release of three sisters of former prime minister Imran Khan. asserted
Court → summon → Khan
All three of Imran’s sisters — Aleema Khan, Noreen Niazi and Uzma Khan — were detained by authorities in September, under the Punjab Maintenance of Public Order Ordinance, 1960, as the PTI geared up for a planned protest march towards Islamabad. asserted
PTI → detain → Islamabad
Their detention was ordered for 30 days. asserted
detention → order → days
A day earlier, Aleema’s son, Shahrez Khan, filed a fresh plea challenging their detention. asserted
son → file → detention
It stated that Imran’s sisters remained at Lahore’s Kot Lakhpat jail despite the lapse of the 30-day period of their detention. asserted
sisters → state → detention
Justice Abher Gul Khan took up the petition on Thursday. asserted
Khan → take → Thursday
Advocate Rana Mudassar Umar appeared on behalf of the petitioner and submitted that the detention orders of the three sisters expired on Oct 19 and 20, but they had not been released. asserted
they → appear → Oct
Justice Khan asked the counsel why he had not made the Lahore deputy commissioner a respondent in the petition. asserted
commissioner → ask → petition
The counsel replied that the deputy commissioner had not been impleaded because the detention notification issued by the official had expired. asserted
notification → reply → official
Uzma’s husband, Ahad Khan, also approached the rostrum and asked the court to summon the deputy commissioner. asserted
husband → approach → commissioner
The judge, however, observed that the official could not be summoned as he had not been made a party to the petition. uncertain
he → observe → petition
Subsequently, the court adjourned the hearing until Oct 28 and directed the home secretary and the jail superintendent to appear in person along with their reports on the matter. asserted
court → adjourn → matter
In Wednesday’s petition, Shahrez contended that the detention period had expired, but the three sisters remained in custody. asserted
sisters → contend → custody
He asked the court to order their release. asserted
He → ask → release
It was argued that their detention was a consequence of their efforts for their brother’s release. asserted
detention → argue → release
It further contended that the preventive detention could not replace ordinary criminal law and that the order violated Article 10 as well as the safeguards of Section 3 of the MPO. uncertain
order → contend → MPO
The petitioner requested the court to direct the jail superintendent to produce the detainees before the court and “set them at liberty, in the interest of justice, equity and fair play”. asserted
petitioner → request → justice
The petitioner asked the court to declare the detention orders void and issue directives for the detainees’ release, while suspending the operation of the orders. asserted
orders → ask → orders
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support