In loss for Trump, Supreme Court won’t let US Postal Service restrict mail ballots
AI generated
The US Supreme Court declined on Sept 14 to let the United States Postal Service (USPS) enforce a rule targeting mail-in ballots, dealing a setback to President Donald Trump’s effort to restrict voting by mail ahead of November’s midterm elections that will determine control of Congress.
asserted
that → let → Congress
The justices denied the Department of Justice’s request to lift a ruling by Boston-based US District Judge Indira Talwani that blocked the USPS from enforcing the measure while legal challenges by states and voting rights groups proceed.
asserted
challenges → deny → states
The agency adopted the measure after Trump issued a March executive order aimed at tightening rules governing mail voting.
asserted
Trump → adopt → voting
“The government is unlikely to succeed on the merits of its challenge to the District Court’s preliminary injunction,” the court said in its brief, one-paragraph order.
asserted
court → succeed → order
Justice Samuel Alito, joined by fellow conservative Justice Clarence Thomas, dissented from the Sept 14 decision, writing that the Trump administration “is likely to succeed on the merits of its appeal”.
asserted
administration → join → appeal
Trump’s fellow Republicans are locked in a tight battle to retain control of Congress in the midterms.
asserted
Republicans → lock → midterms
Restricting mail-in ballots would stand to benefit Republicans given that Democratic voters disproportionately use mail-in ballots, according to various surveys.
uncertain
voters → restrict → surveys
Under the rule, states must provide lists of mail ballot recipients to the USPS and use agency-approved outbound and return ballot mail envelopes outfitted with unique barcodes.
asserted
states → provide → barcodes
The USPS could then refuse to send out ballots that do not comply with the new standards or are associated with voters who do not appear on the lists.
uncertain
who → refuse → lists
Critics have said the plan could disrupt the delivery of thousands of legitimate ballots as the Nov 3 vote approaches and cause chaos given imminent plans by many states to send out mail ballots to eligible voters.
uncertain
vote → say → voters
Talwani imposed an injunction on Sept 4 blocking the rule, finding that it likely violated the US Constitution, under which states administer elections.
asserted
states → impose → elections
Talwani also said it would be impossible for the states to comply given the rapidly approaching midterms.
asserted
it → say → midterms
Another federal judge, Washington-based US District Judge Carl Nichols, also blocked the rule on Sept 13.
asserted
judge → base → Sept
‘Testing the limits’
Sophia Lin Lakin, voting rights project director at the American Civil Liberties Union, which helped to represent some of the challengers to the USPS rule, welcomed the Sept 14 decision.
“This administration keeps testing the limits of its power, as if the rules governing our elections are merely suggestions to ignore when they don’t suit the President’s agenda,” she said.
asserted
she → test → agenda
“But the Constitution gives states and Congress the power to set the rules for federal elections – not the president, and not the Postal Service,” she added.
asserted
she → give → elections
California Governor Gavin Newsom, whose state led one of the lawsuits against the rule, said: “Today is a good day for democracy, the rule of law and the American people looking to exercise their constitutional right to vote.
asserted
Today → lead → right
Trump signed his executive order targeting mail-in ballots after years of casting doubt on their security, though he often votes by mail himself.
asserted
he → sign → mail
Trump has made false claims of widespread fraud in US elections, including his 2020 loss to former Democratic president Joe Biden.
uncertain
Trump → make → Biden
The administration in a Sept 6 emergency request urged the Supreme Court to allow it to implement an “important federal policy to protect the mails from being used to commit voter fraud”.
asserted
it → urge → fraud
Conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh, in a concurring statement on Sept 14, said there is a “fair prospect” that the rule falls within the USPS’ authority.
asserted
rule → concur → authority
He said, however, that state and local election officials “do not have sufficient time to reasonably implement the rule” before the 2026 elections.
asserted
officials → say → elections
In his dissent, Alito likened some of the challengers’ claims to a “Hail Mary pass” that is “unlikely to be successfully completed”, using a football analogy.
“The Postal Service has broad authority to regulate the mail,” Alito added.
uncertain
Alito → liken → mail
States challenged the rule
asserted
States → challenge → rule
A coalition of states, most of them Democratic-governed, and Washington DC, as well as a number of voting rights groups, challenged the new USPS rule.
asserted
most → govern → rule
The Boston-based 1st US Circuit Court of Appeals refused on Sept 10 to put Talwani’s order on hold.
asserted
Court → base → hold
The 1st Circuit said that the rule “will likely result in the disenfranchisement of millions of voters across the country while providing minimal – if any – gains in combating voter fraud”.
asserted
rule → say → fraud
The battle over mail ballots is one in a series of efforts by the administration to boost federal involvement in voting ahead of the midterms.
asserted
battle → boost → midterms
On Aug 24, the Supreme Court lifted an earlier injunction imposed by Talwani in June blocking Trump’s executive order, including the USPS rule before it had been finalised.
asserted
it → lift → rule
The Aporia
