The Aporia
The Straits Times. (2026, October 31). McDonald’s must face lawsuit over McRib, US judge rules. The Straits Times. https://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/mcdonalds-must-face-lawsuit-over-mcrib-us-judge-rules
The Straits Times. “McDonald’s must face lawsuit over McRib, US judge rules.” The Straits Times, 31 Oct. 2026, https://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/mcdonalds-must-face-lawsuit-over-mcrib-us-judge-rules.
The Straits Times. “McDonald’s must face lawsuit over McRib, US judge rules.” The Straits Times, October 31, 2026. https://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/mcdonalds-must-face-lawsuit-over-mcrib-us-judge-rules.
Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.
A federal judge in Chicago ruled on October 30 that McDonald’s must face a class-action lawsuit over its McRib sandwich. Plaintiffs argue that McDonald’s shapes the patty to resemble pork ribs, leading consumers to believe they are getting rib meat despite the actual use of lower-grade cuts like shoulder and heart. The lawsuit alleges this misrepresentation causes customers to overpay for the McRib, which is one of McDonald's most expensive menu items at $7 (S$8.95). Judge April Perry dismissed some claims but allowed others to proceed, citing consumer surveys where 67% to 72% of respondents expected the sandwich to contain rib meat. The judge found it premature to accept McDonald’s argument that no reasonable customer expects the McRib to include rib meat, supporting the plaintiffs' claim of intent to defraud based on marketing and ads highlighting the meat's rib-like shape.