Photo via Mother Jones

The EPA Would Rather Monitor Water for Abortion Pills than Pollution

Read the original at Mother Jones ↗
Cite

Santarsiero, R. (2026, September 15). The EPA Would Rather Monitor Water for Abortion Pills than Pollution. Mother Jones. https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2026/09/the-epa-would-rather-monitor-water-for-abortion-pills-than-pollution/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Mother Jones · collected 2026-09-15 · by Rachel Santarsiero not analyzed yet

Quick Summary

EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin announced at a G20 energy meeting in Houston that the agency will eliminate climate pollution standards for fossil fuel-fired power plants, aiming to support affordable energy. However, just days earlier, the EPA also launched a new study to test water supplies for abortion medications and over 1,000 other chemicals, responding to concerns raised by anti-abortion groups like Students for Life. This shift highlights the EPA’s focus on regulatory priorities under the Trump administration, emphasizing “energy dominance” over environmental protections that would have reduced carbon emissions by 1.38 billion metric tons by 2047 if maintained under the Biden plan.
Written by AI on 2026-09-15, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under Administrator Lee Zeldin is set to repeal rules limiting greenhouse gas emissions from coal and natural gas power plants. This move, expected to be announced as soon as Monday during a G20 energy ministers' meeting in Houston, represents a significant rollback of climate policies established by former Presidents Barack Obama and Joe Biden. The EPA claims the change will remove billions of dollars in costs for the industry and help "unleash" American energy. However, environmental groups argue that it could add up to 5.8 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions by 2050, triggering hundreds of billions in health damages from pollution-driven disease and premature deaths. The EPA's action is part of a broader series of steps to roll back regulatory protections, including dismantling rules on vehicle emissions and air toxics from power plants. Environmentalists are expected to challenge the decision legally. California, which has already phased out coal and implemented its own regulations for natural gas plants, remains particularly vulnerable to these changes. The EPA estimates that the rollback will eliminate more than $300 billion in costs for power plants. Critics argue this move undermines efforts to address climate change and protect public health. Environmental groups have vowed to sue over the decision, calling it a "dark day" for policies protecting people from climate change impacts. This repeal is seen as a significant gift to the fossil fuel industry but faces strong opposition from environmental advocates who warn of severe consequences for air quality and public health.

Written for “EPA Repeals Power Plant Emissions Limits” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 13 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 EPA Repeals Power Plant Emissions Limits
Environment · 14 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 12% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Al Jazeera
Hedges 3 of 40 claims Outlet record 60/100
The Hindu
⚖️ Leans strongly right further right than this Hedges 2 of 7 claims Outlet record 60/100
ProPublica
Hedges 3 of 36 claims Outlet record 58/100
“Article A discusses the EPA's proposal to loosen methane rules for oil and gas wells, while Article B covers a different announcement by the EPA regarding eliminating climate pollution standards for fossil fuel-fired power plants.”
The Independent
Hedges 3 of 27 claims Outlet record 59/100
The Independent
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 7 of 30 claims Outlet record 59/100
CBS News
Hedges 4 of 31 claims Outlet record 66/100
Times of India
⚖️ Leans strongly right further right than this Hedges 7 of 33 claims Outlet record 59/100
Los Angeles Times
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 3 of 54 claims Outlet record 95/100
NBC News
⚖️ Leans strongly right further right than this Hedges 5 of 32 claims Outlet record 60/100
National Post
Hedges 0 of 23 claims Outlet record 60/100
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
34
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
12%
4 of 34 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
96/100
Mother Jones's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
14
Environment
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed never · source text last changed 2026-09-15 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Mother Jones · 414 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Rachel Santarsiero
5 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Over two days in May 2021, 8,000 people entered Ceuta, and in June 2022, 2,000 people attempted to cross the Melilla border fence.
🔮 Modeled after the federal Superfund statute for toxic waste dumps, New York’s climate superfund law would have charged fossil fuel companies $75 billion over 25 years to fund climate adaptation and infrastructure projects.
🔮 Now, with all eyes on the 2026 midterms and the glimmer of accountability that may come from them, why relitigate a primary election that happened almost a decade ago?
🔮 With his characteristic deregulatory zeal, Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin announced before an audience of G20 energy ministers in oil-rich Houston, Texas, that his agency would eliminate climate pollution standards for fossil fuel-fired power plants.
🔮 Deadly heatwaves in May smashed records in the UK, France, Spain, and parts of North Africa.
Also by Rachel Santarsiero
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

EPA Environmental Protection Agency G20 Houston Texas

Subjects

EPA ORG · 8× Biden PERSON · 3× Trump PERSON · 3× Zeldin PERSON · 3× Houston PERSON · 2× the United States GPE · 2× Environmental Protection Agency ORG · 1× G20 ORG · 1× Lee Zeldin PERSON · 1× Texas GPE · 1×

Narrative

But only a few days before Zeldin reassured energy executives that the government would no longer prioritize protecting public health, the EPA announced a new study that would test the country’s water supply for abortion medication, contraception, and hormones used in gender-affirming care, along with over 1,000 other medications and chemicals.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-15
🔮 With his characteristic deregulatory zeal, Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin announced before an audience of G20 energy ministers in oil-rich Houston, Texas, that his agency would eliminate climate pollution standards for fossil fuel-fired power plants.
2026-09-15 · Mother Jones
The EPA Would Rather Monitor Water for Abortion Pills than Pollution · assertive framing

Claims (34 extracted, 4 hedged)

With his characteristic deregulatory zeal, Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin announced before an audience of G20 energy ministers in oil-rich Houston, Texas, that his agency would eliminate climate pollution standards for fossil fuel-fired power plants. asserted
agency → announce → plants
“For over 15 years, the Obama and Biden administrations implemented a war on coal to destroy reliable and affordable energy,” Zeldin said in an EPA press statement issued during the Houston meeting. asserted
Zeldin → implement → meeting
“The Trump Administration has come in to protect American energy and to make sure you can afford to keep the lights on.” asserted
you → come → lights
This announcement was yet another example of the Trump administration’s eagerness to reinforce what Republicans have long considered a priority: freedom from government intrusion or regulation. asserted
Republicans → reinforce → intrusion
But only a few days before Zeldin reassured energy executives that the government would no longer prioritize protecting public health, the EPA announced a new study that would test the country’s water supply for abortion medication, contraception, and hormones used in gender-affirming care, along with over 1,000 other medications and chemicals. asserted
that → reassure → medications
“We have heard loud and clear that Americans are concerned about potential unknown pollutants lurking in their drinking water,” Zeldin wrote in the study press release. asserted
Zeldin → hear → release
The testing of abortion medication has been championed by anti-abortion groups for years, especially by Kristan Hawkins, the leader of Students for Life, who tweeted a video of herself receiving the news that the study was made public. asserted
study → champion → news
In her post, she wrote: “BREAKING: The EPA will now test water for abortion pill pollution!! asserted
EPA → write → pollution
The FDA has recklessly, negligently allowed chemical abortion pills on the market and deregulated them. asserted
FDA → allow → them
They’ve killed millions of babies, harmed mothers, and polluted our water for 26 years. asserted
They → kill → years
For the last year, we’ve been calling on President Trump’s EPA to find out what’s in our water. asserted
what → call → water
After more than three years of innovative water testing, a peer-reviewed research paper, and the introduction of legislation in states, the Pro-Life Generation is finally being heard!” asserted
Generation → review → states
The EPA’s unrelated but tandem announcements reveal an agency that has fundamentally overhauled its policies toward environmental and human health in pursuit of the Trump administration’s “energy dominance” and “Make America Healthy Again” agendas. asserted
America → reveal → agendas
Rolling back power plant pollution standards will lead to higher emissions of the greenhouse gases driving Earth’s warming to deadlier levels, as well as increased levels of smog, mercury, and lead contamination, which can cause health problems. asserted
which → roll → problems
Coal and natural gas-fueled power plants are the second-largest carbon polluter in the United States behind the transportation sector. asserted
plants → fuel → sector
Under the Biden administration, carbon pollution rules for power plant emissions standards would have reduced carbon emissions by 1.38 billion metric tons by 2047. asserted
rules → reduce → 2047
The recently announced plan will repeal these Biden-era regulations and could prevent future administrations from curbing carbon emissions. uncertain
plan → announce → emissions
First reported by Bloomberg News, the EPA’s latest move caps off a year and a half of the agency’s overhaul of federal climate policy. asserted
move → report → policy
In February, the EPA rescinded similar climate vehicle standards and the 2009 endangerment finding, the landmark ruling that asserted greenhouse gases threaten human health. asserted
gases → rescind → health
Much to the dismay of anti-abortion activists, the number of abortions in the United States has actually increased since the Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision, which overturned the constitutional right to an abortion. asserted
which → increase → abortion
One reason for this has been access to abortion medication, the two-drug regimen of mifepristone and misoprostol that act to terminate pregnancies. asserted
that → act → pregnancies
This has activated the anti-abortion movement to find new approaches to ending the procedure, and one of them has been environmental: focusing on the alleged presence of these medications in the water supply. asserted
one → activate → supply
After Republican lawmakers urged the EPA to take up the water study in June, Nathan Donley, the environmental health science director at the Center for Biological Diversity, told The 19th that, compared to other pharmaceuticals, mifepristone is taken as a one-time dose by a small portion of the population. asserted
mifepristone → urge → population
“There are legitimate water quality threats that we need to attack and rectify in a regulatory manner,” Donley said. asserted
Donley → be → manner
“And then there are things that are out in left field that just distract people.” asserted
that → be → people
Meanwhile, monitoring the water supply—which Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. wrote will “give Americans the truth about what is in their water”—may actually co-opt environmental policy to pursue anti-abortion policy. uncertain
co → monitor → policy
“I am deeply concerned,” Betsy Southerland, a former career scientist in EPA’s Office of Water, told Politico. asserted
Southerland → tell → Politico
“If there is any detectable level of mifepristone or its metabolites, the anti-abortion groups will scream that we are unknowingly aborting fetuses by drinking public tap water.” asserted
we → be → water
According to Politico, the EPA insists the study will only determine if a chemical is present in the water supply, not its concentration. uncertain
chemical → accord → supply
But pro-choice activists caution that the study could still pave the way for abortion access restrictions. uncertain
study → caution → restrictions
“If the test finds any trace of abortion pills, conservatives will use it to legitimize their new legal front in the war on reproductive rights,” wrote activist and writer Jessica Valenti on her Substack, Abortion, Every Day. asserted
Valenti → find → Substack
Environmental groups are already planning their legal challenges to the EPA’s latest climate policy rollback. asserted
groups → plan → rollback
“The Trump administration is handing the fossil fuel industry a license to keep polluting,” Holly Bender, chief program officer for the Sierra Club, told The Guardian. asserted
Bender → hand → Guardian
“This is full-throated climate denial while the climate crisis happens in real time and a shocking betrayal of the American public.” asserted
crisis → happen → public
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support