Photo via TIME

12 House Races That Forecasters See Going Different Ways

Read the original at TIME ↗
Cite

Arrieta-Kenna, R. (2026, November 3). 12 House Races That Forecasters See Going Different Ways. TIME. https://time.com/article/2026/11/03/us-election-midterms-forecasters-analysis-house-race-ratings/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

TIME · collected 2026-11-03 · by Ruairí Arrieta-Kenna

Quick Summary

TIME analyzes race ratings from ten election forecasters to identify twelve U.S. House races where predictions vary significantly between Democrats and Republicans. These contested districts include Alabama’s 2nd, Colorado’s 5th, Kentucky’s 6th, Michigan’s 10th, New York’s 17th, Ohio’s 7th, Pennsylvania’s 1st, Texas’ 15th and 35th, Virginia’s 1st and 5th, and Wisconsin’s 1st. The article highlights specific discrepancies in ratings from forecasters like Cook Political Report, Decision Desk HQ, and Sabato’s Crystal Ball for each district, showing mixed predictions that make these races particularly unpredictable.
Written by AI on 2026-11-03, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

As of November 3, 2026, election forecasters have identified 12 closely contested U.S. House races where predictions vary widely between different forecasting models. These races are scattered across key states including Alabama, Colorado, Kentucky, Michigan, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas, Virginia, and Wisconsin.

In Alabama's 2nd congressional district, for instance, the race is leaning towards Democratic incumbent Rep. Shomari Figures according to Sabato’s Crystal Ball (SCB), while Split Ticket (ST) calls it a toss-up and other forecasters favor Republican Rhett Marques.

Similarly, in Colorado’s 5th district, SCB predicts the race will lean towards Jessica Killin, the Democratic candidate, whereas Fox News Power Rankings (FNPR) and Split Ticket predict it will favor the incumbent Republican Rep. Jeff Crank. This variability highlights the uncertainty surrounding these races as voters prepare to cast their ballots.

Written for “House Races Forecaster Uncertainty” on 2026-11-04, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 House Races Forecaster Uncertainty
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 0% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Daily Mail
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 2 of 27 claims Outlet record 69/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of election forecasting and do not describe the same specific incident.”
Los Angeles Times
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 6 of 42 claims Outlet record 95/100
“Article A discusses the general context and outcome of the midterm elections, while Article B focuses on specific contested races in those midterms.”
Times of India
Hedges 3 of 29 claims Outlet record 59/100
“Article A focuses on specific race ratings in 12 contested congressional districts, while Article B discusses broader scenarios and factors influencing the overall outcome of the US midterms.”
CBS News
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 3 of 44 claims Outlet record 65/100
“Article A discusses forecasted outcomes for specific House races, while Article B provides general context and information about the overall election results.”
Daily Mail
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 3 of 61 claims Outlet record 69/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of upcoming House races; Article A covers general trends and predictions, while Article B focuses on conflicting forecasts for specific districts.”
The Straits Times
Hedges 2 of 36 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A discusses how news organizations will make calls for winners in the midterm election, while Article B focuses on specific races with conflicting forecasts from different analysts.”
Silver Bulletin
Hedges 5 of 56 claims
“The articles discuss different aspects of election forecasts and do not describe the same specific incident.”
BBC News
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 6 of 52 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A discusses general Democratic expectations for midterms based on polls, while Article B focuses on specific conflicting forecasts in 12 House races.”
Fox News
Hedges 5 of 47 claims Outlet record 68/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the midterm election, with Article A covering critical races in multiple states for both Senate and House, while Article B focuses specifically on conflicting forecasts for 12 House races.”
Fox News
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 2 of 24 claims Outlet record 68/100
“Article A discusses a general trend in Democrats gaining seats, while Article B focuses on specific races with conflicting forecasts.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
37
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
0%
0 of 37 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
59/100
TIME's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-03 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

TIME · 815 article(s) · 2 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 2 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Ruairí Arrieta-Kenna
3 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 A TIME analysis of race ratings by 10 reputable election forecasters found that of the 35 U.S. Senate seats up for election on Nov. 3, eight are not rated unanimously in favor of one party.
2026-11-03 · assertive framing · 8 Senate Races the Forecasters Can’t Agree On
🔮 Most election forecasters broadly agree on the direction of this year’s 435 U.S. House elections.
Also by Ruairí Arrieta-Kenna
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

Democrat Democratic FPO Republican SCB

Subjects

Republican NORP · 20× SCB ORG · 13× Democrat NORP · 10× Democratic NORP · 10× FPO ORG · 7× DDHQ ORG · 5× CPR ORG · 3× RWH ORG · 3× Texas GPE · 3× Virginia GPE · 3×

Narrative

The analysis examined ratings from Cook Political Report (CPR), Decision Desk HQ (DDHQ), FiftyPlusOne (FPO), Fox News Power Rankings (FNPR), Inside Elections (IE), Race to the WH (RWH), Sabato’s Crystal Ball (SCB), Silver Bulletin’s FLIPR Deluxe model (SB), Split Ticket (ST), and The Economist (TE).
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-03
🔮 Most election forecasters broadly agree on the direction of this year’s 435 U.S. House elections.
2026-11-03 · TIME
12 House Races That Forecasters See Going Different Ways · assertive framing

Claims (37 extracted, 0 hedged)

Most election forecasters broadly agree on the direction of this year’s 435 U.S. House elections. asserted
forecasters → agree → elections
But a TIME analysis of race ratings from 10 reputable forecasters found 12 contests where some favor the Democratic candidate while others favor the Republican. asserted
others → find → Republican
Those 12 conflicting forecasts are in the races for Alabama’s 2nd congressional district, Colorado’s 5th, Kentucky’s 6th, Michigan’s 10th, New York’s 17th, Ohio’s 7th, Pennsylvania’s 1st, Texas’ 15th and 35th, Virginia’s 1st and 5th, and Wisconsin’s 1st. asserted
forecasts → conflict → district
The analysis examined ratings from Cook Political Report (CPR), Decision Desk HQ (DDHQ), FiftyPlusOne (FPO), Fox News Power Rankings (FNPR), Inside Elections (IE), Race to the WH (RWH), Sabato’s Crystal Ball (SCB), Silver Bulletin’s FLIPR Deluxe model (SB), Split Ticket (ST), and The Economist (TE). asserted
analysis → examine → WH
In Alabama’s 2nd congressional district, SCB says the race leans toward Democratic incumbent Rep. Shomari Figures, ST calls it a toss-up, and all eight other forecasters favor Republican Rhett Marques. asserted
forecasters → say → Marques
In Colorado’s 5th district, SCB also says the race leans toward the Democratic candidate, Jessica Killin, while FNPR and ST say it leans toward Republican incumbent Rep. Jeff Crank, and DDHQ and TE rate the race as Likely Republican. asserted
DDHQ → say → race
The remaining five forecasters call the race a toss-up. asserted
forecasters → remain → race
In Kentucky’s 6th district, FPO and SCB say the race leans toward Republican Ralph Alvarado, while ST says it leans toward Democrat Zach Dembo. asserted
it → say → Dembo
The other seven forecasters call it a toss-up. asserted
forecasters → call → it
(TE uses the term “uncertain,” which this analysis treats as the equivalent of a toss-up rating.) asserted
analysis → use → rating
In Michigan’s 10th district, IE says the race tilts toward Republican Michael Bouchard, whereas DDHQ, FPO, SCB, SB, and ST all say it leans toward Democrat Christina Hines. asserted
it → say → Hines
The remaining four forecasters call it a toss-up. asserted
forecasters → remain → it
In New York’s 17th district, CPR and IE rate the race between Republican incumbent Rep. Mike Lawler and Democrat Cait Conley as a toss-up. asserted
CPR → rate → up
SCB says the race leans toward Lawler, while the other seven forecasters all favor Conley. asserted
forecasters → say → Conley
In Ohio’s 7th district, RWH rates the contest between Republican incumbent Rep. Max Miller and Democrat Brian Poindexter as Tilt Republican. asserted
RWH → rat → Republican
IE rates it as Tilt Democratic, SCB and ST as Lean Democratic, and SB as Likely Democratic. asserted
IE → rat → Democratic
The other five forecasters call it a toss-up. asserted
forecasters → call → it
In Pennsylvania’s 1st district, TE rates the race between Republican incumbent Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick and Democrat Bob Harvie as Likely Republican, while SCB and SB say it leans Democratic, and FPO rates it Likely Democratic. asserted
FPO → rat → it
The other six forecasters call the race a toss-up. asserted
forecasters → call → race
In Texas’ 15th district, FPO says the race leans toward Republican incumbent Rep. Monica De La Cruz. asserted
race → say → Cruz
IE says the race tilts toward Democrat Bobby Pulido, while SCB, SB, and ST say it leans Democratic. asserted
it → say → Democratic
The remaining five forecasters call it a toss-up. asserted
forecasters → remain → it
In Texas’ 35th district, SCB and ST say the race leans toward Democrat Johnny Garcia over Republican Carlos De La Cruz. asserted
race → say → Cruz
TE rates the race as Likely Republican. asserted
TE → rat → Republican
All seven other forecasters call it a toss-up. asserted
forecasters → call → it
In Virginia’s 1st district, three forecasters—FPO, SCB, and SB—say the race leans toward Democrat Shannon Taylor over Republican incumbent Rep. Rob Wittman. asserted
race → say → Wittman
IE, DDHQ, and TE rate the race as Tilt, Lean, and Likely Republican, respectively. asserted
IE → rate → Tilt
And the other four forecasters call it a toss-up. asserted
forecasters → call → it
In Virginia’s 5th district, SCB says the race leans toward Democrat Tom Perriello. asserted
race → say → Perriello
All nine other forecasters favor Republican incumbent Rep. John McGuire III—including SB and TE, which rate the race as Likely and Very Likely Republican, respectively, while the others say it leans Republican. asserted
it → favor → Republican
In Wisconsin’s 1st district, FPO says the race leans toward Democrat Mitchell Berman, while CPR, DDHQ, IE, RWH, and SCB say it leans toward Republican incumbent Rep. Bryan Steil, and TE rates it Likely Republican. asserted
TE → say → it
The remaining three forecasters call it a toss-up. asserted
forecasters → remain → it
Of the remaining 423 House races, 182 are unanimously rated Safe or Solid Democratic, and another 31 are unanimously rated in favor of Democrats, though not all as Safe or Solid. asserted
31 → remain → Democrats
On the Republican side, 108 are unanimously rated Safe or Solid Republican, and another 72 are unanimously rated in favor of Republicans, though not all as Safe or Solid. asserted
72 → rat → Republicans
Thirty races have at least one toss-up rating but no disagreement among forecasters who favor a party: 17 for Democrats and 13 for Republicans. asserted
who → have → Republicans
TIME’s analysis reflects the forecasters’ ratings as of 7 a.m. ET, Nov. 3. asserted
analysis → reflect → ET
Ratings describe the forecasters’ assessments of each race based on polling and fundamental assumptions, but they are not guaranteed outcomes. asserted
they → describe → outcomes
💬Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

🕘History 🎫Support