California voters on Tuesday approved Proposition 3, making permanent a tax on the state’s highest earners that pumps billions of dollars a year into public schools and community colleges, according to the Associated Press.
uncertain
that → approve → Press
California’s Proposition 3 drew strong support, with 58.7% voting yes (4.4 million votes) compared with 41.3% voting no (3.1 million), according to Associated Press figures released early Wednesday morning.
uncertain
% → draw → figures
The measure, a constitutional amendment, does not raise taxes.
asserted
measure → raise → taxes
It locks in the higher income tax rates — ranging from 10.3% to 12.3% — that California has charged its top earners since 2012, which are otherwise set to expire after 2030.
asserted
which → lock → 2030
The rates apply to individual income above about $371,000, a threshold adjusted each year for inflation.
asserted
rates → apply → inflation
Taxpayers below that line are not affected.
asserted
Taxpayers → affect → line
The tax brings in an estimated $5 billion to $15 billion a year, according to the state’s nonpartisan Legislative Analyst’s Office.
uncertain
tax → bring → Office
Under the measure, 89% of the education money goes to K-12 schools and 11% to community colleges, with excess funds going to health care in certain years.
asserted
funds → go → years
In flush years, the revenue makes up about 15% of the state’s K-12 budget.
asserted
revenue → make → budget
It is the third time voters have weighed the tax.
asserted
voters → weigh → tax
It first passed in 2012 as Proposition 30, a temporary measure pitched by then-Gov. Jerry Brown to help schools recover from the Great Recession, and voters extended it in 2016 with Proposition 55.
asserted
voters → pass → Proposition
Combined with the state’s separate 1% surcharge on income over $1 million for mental health services, California’s top earners pay a 13.3% rate — the highest state income tax in the nation.
asserted
earners → combine → nation
The California Teachers Association placed the measure on the ballot and poured about $30 million into the campaign.
asserted
Association → place → campaign
Supporters included the California State PTA, the California School Nurses Organization, the California School Employees Association, the California Medical Association and the California Democratic Party.
asserted
Supporters → include → PTA
They argued that losing the revenue would mean layoffs and program cuts, particularly as federal funding cuts hit the state.
asserted
cuts → argue → state
The CTA framed the choice as continued school funding or “a tax cut for the wealthiest Californians.”
asserted
CTA → frame → Californians
Opponents, led by the California Taxpayers Association, the Family Business Association of California and the California Hispanic Chambers of Commerce, argued the tax was sold to voters as temporary and that Californians already pay some of the nation’s highest income, sales and gas taxes.
asserted
Californians → lead → taxes
They urged the state to “fix spending first.”
asserted
They → urge → spending
The measure consistently polled well.
asserted
measure → poll → ?
A Public Policy Institute of California survey of likely voters conducted Oct. 16-22 found 58% support and 41% opposition, nearly identical to its September poll.
asserted
survey → conduct → poll
Democrats, independents, younger voters and renters backed it widely, while Republicans and older voters were opposed.
asserted
Republicans → back → it
Prop. 3 shared the ballot with Proposition 40, a separate one-time 5% wealth tax on California’s roughly 200 billionaires, which lost majority support in PPIC’s final poll after tech leaders spent hundreds of millions of dollars against it.
asserted
leaders → share → it
The measure also became an issue in the race for state superintendent of public instruction, where CTA-backed Richard Barrera supported it.
asserted
Barrera → become → it
The Aporia
